Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 355–367 | Cite as

Adapting to climate change through urban water management: a participatory case study in Indonesia

  • Dewi G. C. Kirono
  • Silva Larson
  • Grace Tjandraatmadja
  • Anne Leitch
  • Luis Neumann
  • Shiroma Maheepala
  • Roland Barkey
  • Amran Achmad
  • Mary Selintung
Original Article

Abstract

The benefits of integrated approaches to climate risk and adaptation studies are increasingly recognised. Thus, there is an increasing need for practical examples of such work in the literature. This paper describes a practical application of an integrated framework for climate change impacts on regional surface water resources and the urban water system in the Mamminasata metropolitan region, Indonesia. Two main features of the framework are: the integration of both climate and other physical and social considerations in the assessment; and the high stakeholder involvement before, during and after project implementation. Although the study is concerned with the Mamminasata region, the overall methodology is transferable to any region in Indonesia or internationally. Key outcomes from this study are: (1) creation of information for Mamminasata planners and water resources managers for when, and under what conditions, the water supply may or may not meet the demand; (2) a clear consensus and shared learning of the problems facing the region among cross-institutional stakeholders; and (3) identification of adaptation options for the urban water system and knowledge gaps and strategies for their implementation. Results of stakeholders’ surveys conducted at the mid-point and at the end of the study indicate that these outputs will provide valuable guidance for future planning and management of Mamminasata regional water resources.

Keywords

Climate adaptation Integrated urban water management Makassar Stakeholder engagement Urban areas Water security 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the AusAID CSIRO Research for Development Alliance (www.rfdalliance.com.au). It was a collaborative effort among the CSIRO, Australia, Hasanuddin University (UNHAS); State Ministry of Environment—the Ecoregion Management Center for SUMAPAPUA (PPE); Bureau of Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics (BMKG); Makassar’s PDAM; the Makassar Public Work Agency (DPU) and Environmental Agency (BLHD); Mamminasata Board; and AusAID-Indonesian Post. We acknowledge significant contribution from all stakeholders and UNHAS students involved in all the project activities. Figure 1 was drawn by Muh N Iman. We thank James Butler, Marie Ekström, Brenda Lin, the editors and three anonymous reviewers for their positive comments on the earlier version of the paper.

References

  1. Barkey RA, Achmad A, Kaimuddin K et al (2011) Review on water service provision in Makassar city, Indonesia. Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia. A report submitted to CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates B, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof J (eds) (2008) Climate change and water—technical paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Secretariat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. Beirele TC, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkmann J, Teichman K (2010) Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: key challenges—scales, knowledge and norms. Sustain Sci 5:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton I, Huq S, Lim B et al (2002) From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy. Climate Policy 2:145–159Google Scholar
  6. Carney S, Whitmarsh L, Nicholson-Cole SA et al (2009) A dynamic typology of stakeholder engagement within Climate Change Research. Tyndall Centre Working Papers. Tyndal Centre for Climate Change Research, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter TR, Parry ML, Harasawa H et al (1994) IPCC technical guidelines for assessing climate change impacts and adaptations with a summary for policy makers and a technical summary. Department of Geography, University College London, UK and the Centre for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, JapanGoogle Scholar
  8. CSIRO (2012) The impacts of climate change and urban development on future water security and the adaptation options for Makassar City, Indonesia. A synthesis of findings from Climate Adaptation through Sustainable Urban Development Research Project (SUD). http://www.rfdalliance.com.au/site/makassar.php
  9. Dessai S, Hulme M, Lempert R et al (2009) Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation? In: Adger WN, Lorenzi I, O’Brien KL (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekström M, Kuruppu N, Wilby W et al (2012) Examination of climate risk using a modified uncertainty matrix framework—applications in the water sector. Glob Environ Change (2012). doi:  10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.003
  11. Feenstra JF, Burton I, Smith JB et al (1998) Handbook on methods for climate change impact assessment and adaptation strategies, version 2.0. UNEP/IVW, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  12. Füssel HM (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Füssel HM, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments and evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change 75:301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hay J, Mimura N (2006) Supporting climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessments in the Asia-Pacific region: an example of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 1:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt A, Watkiss P (2011) Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: a review of literature. Climatic Change 104:13–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones RN (2001) An environmental risk assessment/management framework for climate change. Nat Hazards 23:197–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones RN (2010) A risk management approach to climate change adaptation. In: Nottage RAC et al (eds) Climate change adaptation in New Zealand: future scenarios and some sectoral perspective. New Zealand Climate Change Centre, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  18. Kasperon RE (2006) Rerouting the stakeholder express. Global Environ Chang 16:320–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kemp R, Rotmans J (2009) Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sci 42:303–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiparsky M, Milman A, Vicuna S (2012) Climate and water: knowledge of impacts to action on adaptation. Annu Rev. Environ. Resour. 37:163–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krick T, Forstater F, Monaghan M et al (2005) The stakeholder engagement manual volume 2: the practitioners handbook on stakeholder engagement. Account Ability, the United Nations Environment Programme, and Stakeholder Research AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  22. Larson S, Kirono DGC, Barkey RA, Tjandraatmadja G (2012) Stakeholder engagement within the climate adaptation through sustainable urban development in Makassar-Indonesia Project, the First year report. A Report, CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  23. Larson S, Stoeckl N, Blanco-Martin B (2013) Use of socio-economic typologies for improved integrated management of data-poor regions: explorations from the Australian north. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, Published online on 2 May 2013. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2012.763145
  24. Maheepala S, Blackmore C (2008) Integrated urban water management for cities. In: Newton P (ed) Transitions: pathways towards sustainable urban development in Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Springer, Australia, Netherlands, pp 463–479Google Scholar
  25. Maheepala S, Blackmore J, Diaper C et al (2010) Integrated urban water management for planning manual. Water Research Foundation, DenverGoogle Scholar
  26. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M et al (2008) Climate change: stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319(5863):573. doi: 10.1126/science.1151915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ministry of the Environment (2007) National action plan for addressing climate change (RANPI). Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Bahasa Indonesia)Google Scholar
  28. Pahl-Wostl C, Holtz G, Katens B, Kienpper C (2010) Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the management and transition framework. Environ Sci Policy 13:571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pandey VP, Babel MS, Shresta S, Kazama F (2010) Vulnerability of freshwater resources in large and medium Nepalese river basins to environmental change. Water Sci Technol 61:1525–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perera BJC, James B (2003) A generalised water supply simulation computer software package—REALM. Hydrology Journal 26:67–83Google Scholar
  31. Podestà GP, Natenzon CE, Hidalgo C et al (2012) Interdisciplinary production of knowledge with participation of stakeholders: a case study of a collaborative project on climate variability, human dimensions and agricultural ecosystems in the Argentine Pampas. Environ Sci Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci. 2012.07.08
  32. Pohl C (2011) What is progress in transdisciplinary research? Futures 43:618–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Romero-Lankao P, Borbor-Cordova M, Abrutsky R et al (2012) ADAPTE: a tale diverse teams coming together to do issue-driven interdisciplinary research. Environ Sci Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.12.003 Google Scholar
  34. Roux DJ, Stirzaker RJ, Breen CM et al (2010) Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environ Sci Policy 13:733–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sarewitz D, Pielke R Jr (2007) The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 10:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tjandraatmadja G, Larson S, Kirono D et al (2012a) Challenges in urban water provision for Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. A report, CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  37. Tjandraatmadja G, Neumann L, Lipkin F et al (2012b) Modeling water supply and demand for Makassar city. A Report, CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  38. Tjandraatmadja G, Stone-Jovicich S, Muryanto I et al (2012c) Tools for urban water management and adaptation to climate change. A Report, CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  39. Tjandraatmadja G, Larson S, Kirono D, Salman D, Barkey R, Selitung M (2012d) Climate adaptation through sustainable urban development: developing adaptation options to improve future water security in Makassar City. A report, CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  40. Uittenbroek C, Janssen-Janse B, Runhaar HAC (2012) Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies. Reg Environ Change. doi: 10.1007/s100113-012-0348-8
  41. Ujang Z, Buckley C (2002) Water and wastewater in developing countries: present reality and strategy for the future. Water Sci Technol 46:1–9Google Scholar
  42. UNDP (2005) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. In: Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E, Burton I et al (eds) Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. United Nations (1992) Protection of the quality and supply of freshwater resources: application of integrated approaches to the development, management and use of water resources: Agenda 21. In United Nations Conference on Environment and Development Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Chapter 8Google Scholar
  44. van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 31:445–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yuen E, Preston B (2010) Ten tips for local government: what you need to know when undertaking a vulnerability assessment. A Report, CSIRO Flagship, AustraliaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dewi G. C. Kirono
    • 1
  • Silva Larson
    • 2
    • 5
    • 6
  • Grace Tjandraatmadja
    • 3
  • Anne Leitch
    • 2
  • Luis Neumann
    • 3
  • Shiroma Maheepala
    • 3
  • Roland Barkey
    • 4
  • Amran Achmad
    • 4
  • Mary Selintung
    • 4
  1. 1.CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Climate Adaptation FlagshipAspendaleAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Climate Adaptation FlagshipTownsvilleAustralia
  3. 3.CSIRO Land and Water, Climate Adaptation FlagshipHighettAustralia
  4. 4.Hasanuddin UniversityMakassarIndonesia
  5. 5.AquaEnergieLLCBaldwinsvilleUSA
  6. 6.School of BusinessJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations