Skip to main content
Log in

The governance of integrated ecosystem management in ecological function conservation areas in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between ecological and socioeconomic systems in ecological function conservation areas (EFCAs) in China is analyzed from a governance perspective. Lashihai watershed in China’s southwestern Yunnan Province was chosen as a case study area, where leaders of 81 villager groups were interviewed through questionnaire surveys and anecdotal evidence was collected from focus group discussions. Our study found that the rehabilitated ecosystems in Lashihai, arising from conservation actions, provided the local communities with increasing natural capital to pursue horseback tourism as an important means of livelihood. Also, bonding social capital, together with unique cultural and ethnic assets, may have been instrumental in the formation of horseback tourism teams in some villager groups. However, the lack of higher-level government involvement and coordination among horseback tourism teams appeared to have led to a situation, where the rapidly developing tourism teams have started to impose threats on the wetland ecosystem. While highlighting some limitations of self-governance in adapting to complex and fast-changing socioeconomic conditions, the study called for the potential importance of fostering adaptive co-management to help modify the emerging undesired interconnectedness in social-ecological systems in Lashihai. For the future’s successful governance of integrated ecosystem management in EFCAs in China, the study also made brief discussion on some key elements of the adaptive co-management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The IEM approach is based on an ecosystem approach adopted as Decision V/6 by the COP5 (the Fifth Conferences of Parties) of the Convention of Biological Diversity in 2005 as the primary framework for actions under the Convention. See the link http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7148 for details (COP5 2000). IEM has been implemented in United States, Canada, Australia and some developing countries (Clark et al. 1991; US EPA 1993; Dodge and Biette 1992; Mitchell and Hollick 1993).

  2. The Three Parallel Rivers are the Yangtze (Jinsha), the Lancang (Mekong) and the Nujiang (Salween) rivers.

  3. In 2009, the income per capita in this area was about RMB 2,425 yuan (US$ 365), which was much lower than the average income per capita in rural China (RMB 5,153 yuan) in 2009.

  4. In China, a village serves as a fundamental organizational unit for its rural population. In general, rural areas are organized into administrative villages or village groups, with the latter as subordinate units of the former. The administrative village committees are bureaucratic entities.

  5. The two nation-wide conservation programs were the Sloping Landing Conversion Program and the National Natural Forest Protection Program, both begun in 1998 after a catastrophic flood of the Yangtze River.

  6. At the time of our surveys, three villager group leaders were not available. Thus, we only interviewed leaders of 81 villager groups.

  7. It is important to note here that we did not intend to say that the strong bonding social capital was a sufficient condition for the formation of the horseback tourism teams. Rather, it was only a necessary condition. Indeed, as shown in the column 2 of the Table 3, in the villager groups without horseback tourism teams, the bonding social capital was also high, although in general it was slightly lower in these groups than that in the groups with the horseback tourism teams.

References

  • Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79:387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2002) Who trusts others? J Public Econ 85(2):207–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson KP (2002) Can decentralization save Bolivia’s forests? An institutional analysis of municipal forest governance[D]. Indiana University

  • Armitage D, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur R, Charles A, Davidson-Hunt I et al (2009) Adaptiveco-management for social-ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland JM, Platteau JP (2000) Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities? Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J, Bulte E, van Soest D (2008) Trust and cooperation: social capital and community resource management. J Environ Econ Manage 56(2):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S, Gintis H (2002) Social capital and community governance. Econ J 112:F419–F436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark TW, Amato ED, Whittemore DG, Harvey AH (1991) Policy and programs for ecosystem management in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem: an analysis. Conserv Biol 5(3):412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:S95–S120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COP5 (the Fifth Conferences of Parties) of Convention of Biological Diversity (2000) COP 5 Decision V/6: Ecosystem approach. Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7148 on 6 June 2012

  • Dodge DP, Biette RM (1992) River protection in Ontario, Canada: a case for holistic catchment management. In: Boon PJ, Calow P, Petts GE (eds) River conservation and management. Wiley, New York, pp 443–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Enjolras B (2009) A governance-structure approach to voluntary organizations[J]. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect Q 38:761–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30(1):441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M (1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402(81):11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D (2005) Community empowerment for fisheries co-management. Paper prepared for the APFIC Regional Workshop on Mainstreaming Fisheries Co-management in Asia Pacific—Siem Reap, Cambodia, 9–12 Aug 2005. Retrieved from ftp://fao.org/docrep/fao/008/ae940e/ae940e00.pdf

  • Lan Y, Chen X (2008) The common law and environmental protection of the Naxi People in Lijiang. J Guizhou Univ Ethn Minorities (Philos Soc Sci) 108:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahonge, CPI (2010) Co-managing complex social ecological systems in Tanzania: the case of Lake Jipe wetland. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Wageningen University

  • Margerum RD (1999) Integrated environmental management: the foundations for successful practice. Environ Manage 24(2):151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margerum RDA (2008) Typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management[J]. Environ Manage 41:487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environmental Protection (2007) Guideline for planning of key ecological function conservation areas in China

  • Mitchell B, Hollick M (1993) Integrated catchment management in Western Australia: transition from concept to implementation. Environ Manage 17(6):735–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan D (2002) Bonds and bridges: social capital and poverty. In: Ramaswamy S (ed) Social capital and economic development: well-being in developing countries. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Hatfield-Dodds S, Howden M, Smith MS (2008) Using adaptive governance to rethink the way science supports Australian drought policy. Environ Sci Policy 11(7):588–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manage 34(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB, Norgaard RB, Policansky D (1999) Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284(5412):278–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parkins JR (2006) De-centering environmental governance: a short history and analysis of democratic processes in the forest sector of Alberta, Canada[J]. Sci Policy 39:183–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy RS, Berkes F (1997) Two to tango: the role of government in fisheries co-management. Mar Policy 21(5):465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Ward H (2001) Social capital and the environment. World Dev 29:209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schliep R, Stoll-Kleemann S (2010) Assessing governance of biosphere reserves in Central Europe[J]. Land Use Policy 27:917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel J (2002) Can we trust social capital? J Econ Lit 40(1):139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone EA, Wu JJ (2008) Optimal design of government hierarchy for ecosystem service provision: American Agricultural Economics Association Annual meeting, Orlando, FL

  • UNEP, GEF, MEP (2011) Final Report on the Upper Yangzi River Ecological Monitoring and Early Warning System. Nature Conservation and Flood control in the Yangtze River Basin Project

  • US EPA (1993) Geographic targeting: selected state examples. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • White AT, Vogt HP (2000) Philippine coral reefs under threat: lessons learned after 25 years of community-based reef conservation[J]. Mar Pollut Bull 40:537–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong K, Peng X (2008) A general review on the Naxi ethnic concepts. J Xinjing Normal Univ(Soc Sci) 29(3):33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura T, Zhang TX, Fujiki Y (2006) The social and cultural impact of tourism development on world heritage sites: a case of the Old Town of Lijiang, China, 2000–2004. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 97. www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the UNEP/GEF project implemented by MEP. It is jointly funded by Nature Conservation and Flood control in the Yangtze River Basin (C/IV/S/06/475); National Nature Science Funding Project No. 41201576, National Nature Science Funding Project No. 71203223, National Science and Technology Support Plan Project No. 2012BAC01B01, and Renmin University of China’s Humanity and Social Science International Journal Publication Cultivation Project No. 2011030354. We owe our gratitude to Professor Ma Zhong, Dr. Su De, He Jianbang and Li Xintong for their generous support and valuable advice throughout this project. We appreciate the help and support from Mr. Yang Zhang, Ms. Xiong Ping and other staff members at Lijiang Environmental Protection Bureau for the field work of this study. We also acknowledge Ms. Liu Hao and Ms. Yu Xiaoyang for their research assistance. Finally, we want to thank three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yazhen Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, J., Gong, Y., Zhou, J. et al. The governance of integrated ecosystem management in ecological function conservation areas in China. Reg Environ Change 13, 1301–1312 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0445-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0445-3

Keywords

Navigation