Skip to main content

Conservation of Sarawak peat swamp in an urban landscape by fuzzy inference system


Freshwater habitats are one of the planet’s most important, yet most manipulated, environments. This is what happens in Sarawak that the environment has been radically changed due to urban developments. This paper is promoting the idea that we do not need a complicated but a simple tool like fuzzy inference system to strike a balance between the existence of peat swamp and the humans who live nearer and nearer to it. Conditions vital to the survival and continuity of a natural wetland system can be adapted as fuzzy rules. These rules are capable of providing indicators of how much wetland can be exploited and at the same time still allow the system to properly functioning as a wetland.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2001) Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the twenty-first century. Sprawl Watch Clearing House Monograph Series, Washington DC, p 32

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentrup G (2009) Conservation buffers: design guidelines for buffers, corridors and greenways. General technical report SRS-109. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, p 110

    Google Scholar 

  3. Booth DT, Cox SE, Simonds G (2007) Riparian monitoring using 2-cm GSD aerial photography. Ecol Indic 7(3):636–648. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosserman RW, Ragade RK (1982) Ecosystem analysis using fuzzy set theory. Ecol Model 16(2–4):191–208. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(82)90008-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duarte CM, Dennison WC, Orth RJW, Carruthers TJB (2008) The charisma of coastal ecosystems: addressing the imbalance. Estuaries and Coasts 31(2): 233–238. doi:10.1007/s12237-008-9038-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ecological Solutions Group (ESG) (2010) US lentic wetland health assessment (survey) user manual (current as of 5/20/2010). Accessed 7 Sept 2010

  7. Elektorowicz M, Qasaimeh A (2004) Fuzzy modelling estimation of mercury removal by wetland components. Fuzzy Inf 1:37–40. doi:10.1109/NAFIPS.2004.1336245

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S (2007) Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environ 33(1):115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lei Z-Y, Yan Y-X (2010) Fuzzy assessment of estuarine wetland health. Manag Serv Sci 35:1–4. doi:10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5577550

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ocampo-Duque W, Ferré-Huguet N, Domingo JL, Schuhmacher M (2006) Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inference systems: a case study. Environ Int 32(6):733–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Prichard D (1998) Riparian area management: a user guide to assessing proper functioning condition and the supporting science for lotic areas. Technical reference 1737-15, US Department of the Interior and partners

  12. Rich TD (2002) Using breeding land birds in the assessment of western riparian systems. Wildl Soc Bull 30(4):1128–1139

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salski A, Holsten B, Trepel M (2009) A fuzzy approach to ecological modeling and data analysis. In: Jorgensen SE, Chon T-S, Recknagel F (eds) Handbook of ecological modeling and informatics. ISBN 978-1-84564-207-5. WIT Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tay KM, Lim CP (2008a) On the use of fuzzy inference techniques in assessment models: part I: theoretical properties. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 7(3):269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tay KM, Lim CP (2008b) On the use of fuzzy inference techniques in assessment models: part II: industrial applications. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 7(3):283–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Townsend L (2009) Urban watershed health and resilience, evaluated through land use history and eco-hydrology in Swan Lake watershed (Saanich, British Columbia, Canada). M Sc thesis. Canada: School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria

  17. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2006) Malaysia’s peat swamp forests, conservation and sustainable use, 33 p. ISBN 983-40995-5-X

  18. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2010) Natural infrastructure, updated July 2010. Accessed 16 Aug 2010

  19. Ward TA, Tate KW, Atwill ER, Lile DF, Lancaster DL, McDougald N, Barry S, Ingram RS, George HA, Jensen W, Frost WE, Phillips R, Markegard GG, Larson S (2003) A comparison of three visual assessments for riparian and stream health. J Soil Water Conser 58(2):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zadeh LA (2002) Fuzzy logic toolbox user’s guide, for use with MATLAB®. Version 2. MathWorks, US, pp 2-1–2-116.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darrien Yau Seng Mah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mah, D.Y.S. Conservation of Sarawak peat swamp in an urban landscape by fuzzy inference system. Reg Environ Change 11, 307–310 (2011).

Download citation


  • Disappearing wetlands
  • Ecological–social interaction
  • Habitat
  • Indicator
  • Natural landscape
  • Nature conservation