Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 271–284 | Cite as

Participatory scenario development for integrated sustainability assessment

Original Article


The paper discusses the role of visions within sustainability assessment and governance for sustainable development in Europe. Currently, our societies (still) develop along an unsustainable path, which results in a number of persistent problems (climate change, loss of biodiversity, poverty, etc.). Integrated sustainability assessment (ISA) is one approach designed to initiate transitions towards sustainability. Visions of a sustainable future form an important part of ISA. These visions support the process of discussing how the transition from today’s societies/systems to a sustainable future can be achieved. According to the principles of ISA, visions should be developed in a participatory way, thus including the ideas and perceptions of stakeholders, decision-makers, experts and/or citizens. The paper starts with an introduction of the concepts of visions and scenarios and describes exemplary methods for their participatory development. Then, the main concepts for integrated sustainability assessment in comparison with other impact assessments are discussed. The main body of the paper presents experiences in three projects (ARTEMIS, ALARM, ECOCHANGE) in which visions and scenarios of sustainable futures were developed with stakeholders. The paper concludes with lessons learned and suggestions for future applications for participatory scenario development.


Scenarios Sustainability assessment Participation Stakeholders 


  1. Clark WC et al (2001) Acid rain, ozone depletion, and climate change: an historical overview. In: The Social Learning Group, learning to manage global environmental risks. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 22–55Google Scholar
  2. Bohunovsky L, Madlener R, Omann I, Bruckner M, Stagl S (2007) Lokale Energiesysteme der Zukunft. Integrierte Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von lokalen Energieszenarien. Ökologisch Wirtschaften 2(2007):47–50Google Scholar
  3. Brand K-W (2000) Nachhaltigkeitsforschung—Besonderheiten, Probleme und Erfordernisse eines neues Forschungstypus. In: Brand K-W (ed) Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transdisziplinarität. Analytica, Berlin, pp 6–25Google Scholar
  4. IPCC (2000) Emission scenarios. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Jäger J, Rothman D, Anastasi C, Kartha S, van Notten P (2008) Training Module 6. Scenario development and analysis. GEO Resource Book. A training manual on integrated environmental assessment and reporting. Available at:
  6. Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans JR (2007) Transition management as a model to manage processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2008) Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197(3):1063–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Madlener R, Kowalski K, Stagl S (2007) New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: the case of renewable energy use in Austria. Energ Pol 35(12):6060–6074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Emissions Scenarios. 2000 (pp 570). Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Settele J, Hammen VC, Hulme PE, Karlson U, Klotz S, Kotarac M, Kunin WE, Marion G, O’Connor M, Petanidou T, Peterson K, Potts SG, Pritchard H, Pysek P, Rounsevell M, Spangenberg J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Sykes MT, Vighi M, Zobel M, Kuhn I (2005) ALARM: assessing large scale environmental risks for biodiversity with tested methods. GAIA 14(1):69–72Google Scholar
  11. Shell International (2003) Scenarios: explorers’ guide.
  12. Spangenberg JH (2007) Integrated scenarios for assessing biodiversity risks. Sustain Dev 15(6):343–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stocker A, Jaeger J, Meyer B, Omann I (2007) The socio-economic modelling for the ALARM project: process and results. SERI Working Paper 6. Available at:
  14. Tàbara JD, Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Sustainability learning in the management of social-ecological systems. MATISSE Working Paper 11. Available at:
  15. Tàbara JD, Elmqvist B, Ilhan A, Madrid C, Olson L, Schilperoord M, Valkering P, Wallman P, Weaver P (2007) Participatory Modelling for the integrated sustainability assessment of water: the World Cellular Model and the MATISSE Project. MATISSE Working Paper 9. Available at:
  16. Tuinstra W, Jäger J, Weaver PM (2008) Learning and evaluation in integrated sustainability assessment. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 3/1. Special Issue: Integrated Sustainability Assessment: Concept, Process and ToolsGoogle Scholar
  17. van de Kerkhof MF, Tuinstra W, Spanjersberg M, Hisschemöller M, Mol APJ (2002) Conclusions and lessons for participatory integrated assessment. In: Hisschemöller M, Mol APJ (eds) Evaluating the COOL dialogues. Climate options for the long term. Final report. (NRP, 410200119. Programme Office NRP, Bilthoven, pp 93–102Google Scholar
  18. Weaver PM, Rotmans J (2006) Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it, and how? Int J Innov Sustain Dev 1(4):284–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Whitmarsh L, Swartling Å, Jäger J (2009) Participation of experts and non-experts in a sustainability assessment of mobility. Environ Policy Gov 19:232–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainable Europe Research InstituteViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations