Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 15–29 | Cite as

Institutional credibility and leadership: critical challenges for community-based natural resource governance in rural and remote Australia

Original Article


Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) institutions are challenged with finding common ground as a basis for action among diverse resource users and stakeholders. Establishing and maintaining institutional credibility within their regions, catchments, communities and among their membership is fundamental to overcoming the challenge. So too is applying appropriate institutional and governance structures and appointing appropriate leaders. Drawing on triangulated case study data collected over a 12-month period using multiple methods, this paper examines the influence of institutional credibility and leadership on the functioning, decision-making and governance of two CBNRM institutions in Queensland, Australia. The paper shows that stakeholders have very different expectations of what makes a CBNRM institution credible. Satisfying the multiple expectations requires CBNRM institutions to incorporate diverse stakeholder representation, assert their legitimacy and demonstrate accountability, transparency, fairness and justice. The paper also draws attention to the value and importance of appointing inspirational leaders who focus on encouraging followers to pursue collective goals. Comparing the merits and constraints of appointing average Joes versus community elites to the Boards of CBNRM institutions, the paper highlights the urgent need for community-based natural resource governance and inspirational leadership education and training programs to improve the availability and quality of CBNRM leadership in rural Australia. Since combining credible CBNRM institutions with inspirational leaders does not necessarily equate to sustainable on-ground NRM outcomes, it is critical that the education and training programs emphasise the importance of monitoring and evaluating the improvements in decision-making processes and in decision outcomes.


Community-based Natural resource management Institutional credibility Governance Inspirational leadership 


  1. Adizes I (1999) Managing corporate lifecycles: how to get to and stay at the top. Prentice Hall, ParamusGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres J (2005) Building trust, leadership and power for action in rural communities. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engaging Communities, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bass BM (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bawden RJ (2000). Valuing the episteme. Cybern Hum Knowl 7:5–25Google Scholar
  5. Beierle TC (1999) Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Policy Stud Rev 16(3):75–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beierle TC, Konisky DM (2000) Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning. J Policy Anal Manage 19(4):587–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard T, Young J (1997) The ecology of hope: communities collaborate for sustainability. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BCGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry JK, Gordon JC (eds), (1993) Environmental leadership: developing effective skills and styles. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bono JE, Anderson MH (2005) The advice and influence networks of transformational leaders. J Appl Psychol 90(6):1306–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brinkerhoff DW (2005) Organisational legitimacy, capacity and capacity development. European Centre for Development Policy Management, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  11. Brosius JP, Tsing AL, Zerner C (1998) Representing communities: histories and politics of community-based natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 11:157–168Google Scholar
  12. Bryan TA (2004) Tragedy averted: the promise of collaboration. Soc Nat Resour 17:881–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burns JM (1978) Leadership. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. CoA (2001) Stronger regions, a stronger Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Transport and Regional Services, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  15. CoA (2002) Intergovernmental agreement on a national action plan for salinity and water quality. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  16. CoA (2004) Bilateral agreement to deliver the natural heritage trust extension between the Commonwealth of Australia and the State of Queensland. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  17. Colquitt JA (2004) Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. J Appl Psychol 89(4):633–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millenium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol 86(3):425–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Commission of the European Communities (2001) European governance: a white paper. Commission of the European Communities, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. Cortner HJ, Moote MA (1999) The politics of ecosystem management. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Danter KJ, Griest DL, Mullins GW, Norland E (2000) Organizational change as a component of ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resour 13:537–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis A, Bailey C (1996) Common in custom, uncommon in advantage: common property, local elites, and alternative approaches to fisheries management. Soc Nat Resour 9:251–265Google Scholar
  23. De Cremer D, Tyler TR (2005) Managing group behavior: the interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 37:151–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Egri C, Herman S (2000) Leadership in the North American environmental sector: values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organisations. Acad Manage J 43(4):571–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisler R (1995) From domination to partnership: the hidden subtext for organisational change. Train Dev 49(2):32–40Google Scholar
  26. Epitropaki O, Martin R (2005) The moderating role of individual differences in the relation between transformational/transactional leadership perceptions and organizational identification. Leadersh Q 16:569–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fenton M (2004) Socio-economic indicators for NRM (Project A1.1): indicators of capacity, performance and change in regional NRM bodies. National Land & Water Resources Audit, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  28. Gray I, Williams R, Phillips E (2005) Rural community and leadership in the management of natural resources: tensions between theory and policy. J Environ Policy Plann 7(2):125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haslam SA, Platow MJ (2001) The link between leadership and followship: how affirming social identity translates vision into action. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27(11):1469–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hays PA (2004) Case study research. In: deMarrais K, Lapan SD (eds) Foundations for research: methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  31. Hegtvedt KA, Markovsky B (1995) Justice and injustice. In: Cook KS, Fine GA, House JS (eds) Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  32. Hemmati M (2002) Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Hofmann DA, Jones LM (2005) Leadership, collective personality, and performance. J Appl Psychol 90(3):509–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hogan R, Kaiser RB (2005) What we know about leadership. Rev Gen Psychol 9(2):169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hogg MA, Abrams D, Otten S, Hinkle S (2004) The social identity perspective: intergroup relations, self-conception and small groups. Small Group Res 35(3):246–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hunt L, Haider W (2001) Fair and effective decision making in forest management planning. Soc Nat Resour 14:873–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huse M (2005) Accountability and creating accountability: a framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. Br J Manage 16:S65–S79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Innes JE, Booher DE (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. J Am Plann Assoc 65(4):412–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. International Council for Science (2005) Harnessing science, technology, and innovation for sustainable development. A report from the ICSU-ISTS-TWAS Consortium ad hoc Advisory Group, ParisGoogle Scholar
  40. Kan MM, Parry KW (2004) Identifying paradox: a grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. Leadersh Q 15:467–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Karkkainen BC (2003) Toward ecologically sustainable democracy? In: Fung A, Wright EO (eds) Deepening democracy: institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Korfmacher KS (2001) The politics of participation in watershed modelling. Environ Manage 27:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lane MB, McDonald GT, Morrison TH (2004) Decentralisation and environmental management in Australia: a comment on the prescriptions of the Wentworth Group. Aust Geogr Stud 24(1):103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lawrence G (2004) Promoting sustainable development: the question of governance, paper presented at the XI World Congress of Rural Sociology, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  45. Lawrence RL, Daniels SE, Stankey GH (1997) Procedural justice and public involvement in natural resource decision making. Soc Nat Resour 10:577–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leach WD (2004) Is devolution democratic? Assessing collaborative environmental management. Center for Collaborative Policy, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  47. LeCompte MD, Schensul JJ (1999) Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Altamira Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  48. Lee KN (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  49. Lind EA, Tyler TR (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Lind EA, Tyler TR, Huo YJ (1997) Procedural context and culture: variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol 73(4):767–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lipman-Blumen J (2000) Connective leadership: managing in a changing world. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Lorenzi P (2004) Managing for the common good: prosocial leadership. Organ Dyn 33(3):282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Macadam R, Drinan J, Inall N, McKenzie B (2004) Growing the capital of rural Australia—the task of capacity building. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  54. Marshall GR (2004) Farmers cooperating in the commons? A study of collective action in salinity management. Ecol Econ 51:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCay BJ (2002) Emergence of institutions for the commons: contexts, situations, and events. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) The drama of the commons. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Michie S, Gooty J (2005) Values, emotions, and authenticity: will the real leader please stand up? Leadersh Q 16:441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Milbrath LW (1989) Sustainable society: learning our way out. SUNY University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Morse JM, Richards L (2002) Read me first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  59. Nancarrow BE, Syme GJ (2001) Challenges in implementing justice research in the allocation of natural resources. Soc Justice Res 14(4):441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nordlund AM, Garvill J (2002) Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environ Behav 34(6):740–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Olli E, Grendstad G, Wollebaek D (2001) Correlates of environmental behaviors: bringing back social context. Environ Behav 33(2):181–208Google Scholar
  62. O’Neill O (2002) A question of trust. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Pawar BS, Eastman KK (1997) The nature and implications of contextual influences on transformational leadership: a conceptual examination. Acad Manage Rev 22(1):80–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pero LV (2005) From governance rhetoric to practical reality: making community-based natural resource management decision-making work. Griffith J Environ 1(1):1–30Google Scholar
  65. Platow MJ, Reid S, Andrew S (1998) Leadership endorsement: the role of distributive and procedural behavior in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Group Processes Intergroup Relat 1(1):35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Plummer R, FitzGibbon J (2004) Co-management of natural resources: a proposed framework. Environ Manage 33(6):876–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Moorman RH, Fetter R (1990) transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organiszational citizenship behaviors. Leadersh Q 1:107–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Popper M (2004) Leadership as relationship. J Theory Soc Behav 34(2):107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prewitt V (2003) Leadership development for learning organizations. Leadersh Organ Dev J 24(2):58–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Probst K, Hagmann J (2003) Understanding participatory research in the context of natural resource management: paradigms, approaches and typologies. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Ravnborg HM, Westermann O (2002) Understanding interdependancies: stakeholder identification and negotiation for collective natural resource management. Agric Syst 73:41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reddel T (2002) Beyond participation: hierarchies, management and markets—“new” governance and place policies. Aust J Public Adm 61(1):50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Reicher S, Haslam SA, Hopkins N (2005) Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadersh Q 16:547–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ribot JC (2002) Democratic decentralization of natural resources: insitutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  75. Ribot JC (2004) Waiting for democracy: the politics of choice in natural resource decentralization. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  76. RIWG (2004) Regional delivery of NRM—moving forward. Regional Implementation Working Group reporting to Natural Resource Policies and Programs Committee, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  77. Roberts J, McNulty T, Stiles P (2005) Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: creating accountability in the boardroom. Br J Manage 16:S5–S26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Robinson MK (2001) Nonprofit boards that work: the end of one-size-fits-all governance. Wiley, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  79. Rubin H (2002) Collaborative leadership: developing effective partnerships in communities and schools. Corwin Press, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  80. Rubin RS, Munz DC, Bommer WH (2005) Leading from within: the effects of emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behavior. Acad Manage J 48(5):845–858Google Scholar
  81. Rudd MA (2000) Live long and prosper: collective action, social capital and social vision. Ecol Econ 34(234):131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rydin Y, Pennington M (2000) Public participation and local environmental planning: the collective action problem and the potential of social capital. Local Environ 5(2):153–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Scheffer M, Brock W, Westley F (2000) Socioeconomic mechanisms preventing optimum use of ecosystem services: an interdisciplinary theoretical analysis. Ecosystems 3:451–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schultz PW, Zelezny L (1999) Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. J Environ Psychol 19:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schutt RK (2004) Investigating the social world: the process and practice of research, 4th edn. Pine Forge Press, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  86. Schwartz SH (1994) Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J Soc Issues 50(4):19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Seawright J, Gerring J (2005) Case-selection techniques in case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Accessed 28 April 2006
  88. Shrivastava P (1994) Ecocentric leadership in the 21st century. Leadersh Q 5(3/4):223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shucksmith M, Chapman P (1998) Rural development and social exclusion. Sociol Ruralis 38:225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Smith PD, McDonough MH (2001) Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision making. Soc Nat Resour 14:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sosik JJ (2005) The role of personal values in the charismatic leadership of corporate managers: a model and preliminary field study. Leadersh Q 16:221–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Spies S, Murdock SH, White S, Krannich R, Wulfhorst JD, Wrigley K, Leistritz FL, Sell R, Thompson J (1998) Support for waste facility siting: differences between community leaders and residents. Rural Sociol 63:65–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stake RE (1995) The art of case study research. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  94. Stead WE, Stead JG (1996) Management for a small planet: strategic decision making and the environment. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  95. Syme GJ, Nancarrow BE (2001) Social justice and environmental management: an introduction. Soc Justice Res 14(4):343–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Thomas J (1993) Doing critical ethnography. Sage Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  97. Thompson L, Kray LJ, Lind EA (1998) Cohesion and respect: an examination of group decision making in social and escalation dilemmas. J Exp Soc Psychol 34:289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tyler TR, De Cremer D (2005) Process-based leadership: fair procedures and reactions to organisational change. Leadersh Q 16:529–545Google Scholar
  99. van Knippenberg B, van Knippenberg D, De Cremer D, Hogg MA (2005) Research in leadership, self, and identity: a sample of the present and a glimpse of the future. Leadersh Q 16:495–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. van Knippenberg D, van Knippenberg B, De Cremer D, Hogg MA (2004) Leadership, self and identity: a review and research agenda. Leadersh Q 15:825–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Vining J, Ebreo A (2002) Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behavior. In: Bechtel RB, Churchman A (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  102. Williams BA, Matheny AR (1995) Democracy, dialogue, and environmental disputes: the contested languages of social regulation. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  103. Wit AP, Kerr NL (2002) “Me versus just us versus us all” categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. J Pers Soc Psychol 83(3):616–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Yandle T (2003) The challenge of building successful stakeholder organizations: New Zealand’s experience in developing a fisheries co-management regime. Mar Policy 27:179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.University of the Sunshine CoastMaroochydoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations