Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stakeholder responses to future flood management ideas in the Rhine River Basin: nature or neighbour in Hell’s Angle

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

One professor says ‘it will be dryer’, the other one says ‘it will be wetter’.

We all have mobile telephones so we know it when the water comes.

The social cohesion of this community will be lost forever.

When you’re not bought out you’ll be the real victim.

We like to have a nature reserve area around here.

Summary

This article identifies responses of stakeholders to future management of the Rhine River Basin, notably to the plan Rhine In The Future. This plan foresees the construction of a bypass between the rivers Rhine and IJssel, the Green River. The Green River would be a nature reserve area that can be flooded during high water discharges. The inhabitants of the area would be permanently relocated. Their defence of stakes will be coloured by patterns of acting and thinking that belong to respectively postmodernity, modernity and pre-modernity. These different colourings show in negotiation skills, levels of organisations, alertness, power positions, and access to local and outside resources. Most local stakeholders appreciate the postmodern environmentalism that leads to the greening of river management, but regret the loss of their strong, pre-modern, social cohesion. Whereas they consider national interests in a rather balanced way, they doubt the necessity of the bypass for safety reasons. They have confidence in financial compensations for relocation, but will negotiate about these compensations with skill and determination. Their tactics will be reinforced by collective efforts that stem from their social cohesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrarisch Dagblad (1999) Vrees voor voortbestaan bedrijven uiterwaarden. April 24

  • Beck U (1992) Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. Sage, London

  • Brand P (1999) ‘The Environment and Postmodern Spatial Consciousness: A Sociology of Urban Environmental Agendas’. J Environmental Planning and Management 42(5):631–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, J. & M. Hisschemoller 1998. Omgevingswaarden en de kust. Research Paper R98/12. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies.

  • De Gelderlander (1999) Veilige Rijn kost 4 tot 5 miljard. April 15, Arnhem

  • De Volkskrant (1999) Ruimte voor rivieren is nieuwe toverformule. April 20, Amsterdam

  • Grijp N van der, Olsthoorn A (2003) Institutional Framework for Management of the Rivers Rhine and Meuse in the Netherlands: An Overview. SIRCH Working Paper, IVM Report D-00/03. Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • GRIP (1999) Voor een appel en een ei. Manifest of the Pressure Group ‘Groessen in Protest’, June 13, Helhoek

  • Harvey D (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Blackwell, London

  • Heertje A (1999) ‘Kok moet het tij keren’. In: Vrij Nederland, July 24, pp 18–19

  • IAWQ, EWPCA, NVA (1994) Living with Water. International Conference on Integrated Water Resources Management, 26–29 September, Amsterdam

  • Lash S, Szerszynski B, Wynne B (eds) (1996) Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology. Sage, London

  • Liemers College (1999) De Groene Rivier. Project of high school (VWO) students. Liemers College, Zevenaa

  • Marshall H (1995) ‘Discourse Analysis in an Occupational Context.’ In: Cassell C, Symon G (eds) Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Sage, London, pp 91–106

  • Meurs Rudie van (1996) Hoog water: Boerenrepublieken. Scheffers, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Metro (1999) Ruimte voor Rivieren kost bedrijven miljoenen. June 23, Amsterdam

  • Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat (2000) Discussienota Ruimte voor de rivier. Staatsdrukkerij, The Hague

  • NRC Handelsblad (1998) ‘Plan voor nieuwe Groene Rivier’. August 27, Rotterdam

  • Olsthoorn A, de Wolf H (1999) The Evolution of Acceptable Risk. Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1998) Ruimte voor Rijntakken. Rijkswaterstaat, Directie Oost-Nederland, Arnhem

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1999) Stand van zaken: Ruimte voor Rijntakken. Rijkswaterstaat, Directie Oost-Nederland, Arnhem

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1999) Verslag: Openbare informatiebijeenkomst in het kader van Stand van zaken Ruimte voor Rijntakken. Minutes of information meeting at 28 April 1999, Arnhem. Rijkswaterstaat, Directie Oost-Nederland, Arnhem

  • Rooij PTJC van (1995) ‘Towards Comprehensive Water Management in the Netherlands: (1) Developments.’ In: European Water Pollution Control, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp 59–66

  • Rooij PTJC van (1995) ‘Towards Comprehensive Water Management in the Netherlands: (2) Bottlenecks.’ In: European Water Pollution Control, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp 33–40

  • Rooij PTJC van (1996) ‘Towards Comprehensive Water Management in the Netherlands: (3) Planning.’ In: European Water Pollution Control, Vol. 6, no. 3, pp 36–45

  • Rooij PTJC van, van Sluis JW, Tolkamp HH, de Jong J (1997) ‘Towards Comprehensive Water Management in the Netherlands: (7) AUTUNNO and Evaluation of Overall Approach of IPEA.’ In: European Water Pollution Control, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp 5-15

  • Roy Arundathi (1999) ‘The Greater Common Good. India Has 3,600 Dams. They Have Devoured 50 Million People Already. Silently. Now It’s The Turn Of The Narmada.’ In: Outlook, May 24, pp 54–72

  • Sessions G (ed) (1995) Deep Ecology for the 21st Century: Readings on the Philosophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism. Shambhala, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Straten F van (2000) ‘Het water herneemt zijn ruimte.’ NRC Handelsblad, 31.8.2000:7

  • Tol RSJ, van der Grijp N, Olsthoorn A, van der Werff PE (1999) Adapting to Climate Change: A Case Study on Riverine Food Risks in the Netherlands. SIRCH Working Paper 5, IVM Report D-99/10. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies

  • Toulmin S (1992) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Trouw (1999) ‘Boeren vrezen verlies uiterwaarden’. April 20, Amsterdam

  • Veldboer L (1996) De inspraak voorbij: Ervaringen van burgers en lokale bestuurders met nieuwe vormen van overleg. Instituut voor Publiek en Politiek, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallaart T (1999) ‘Betuwelijn, een wanbesluit’. In: Vrij Nederland, July 24, pp 18–19

  • WL/Delft Hydraulics (1998) De Rijn Op Termijn. WL/Delft Hydraulics, Delft

  • Werff PE van der (2001) Kerala

  • Werff PE van der, Gupta J (2001) Stakeholder Research in the Context of Technology Transfer. An Inductive Analysis of Approaches and Shortcomings. IVM Report Number D-00/12. Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam

  • Wolf ER (1966) Peasants. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

Download references

Acknowledgement

This article is part of the project on Social and Institutional Responses to Climate Change and Climatic Hazards (SIRCH) conducted in 1998–2001. The SIRCH project is a collaboration of the Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam, Oxford University, Middlesex University, University of Seville and University of Madrid. The SIRCH-project is financed through the European Commission, DG 12.

The British partners concentrate on future management of flood and drought risk in the Thames River basin. The Spanish partners study the same for droughts in the lower Guadalquivir River basin. The Dutch look at the same for floods in the Rhine-Meuse River basin. They have studied institutional aspects and risk perceptions at the national level, and scenarios of future climate that may create higher flood risks.

The present study concerns perceptions and responses of local stakeholders to future changes in river basin management. The stakeholders contributed with care to the research in lengthy interviews, telephone calls, follow-up contacts and casual meetings. The research was discussed in half-yearly SIRCH meetings, two seminars at Delft Hydraulics and scientific conferences abroad. Along with gratitude to the responding stakeholders and participants of meetings, thanks are expressed to Alison Gilbert, Nicolien van der Grijp, Darley Jose, Xander Olsthoorn and Richard Tol for their comments on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter E. van der Werff.

Appendix: Methodology

Appendix: Methodology

Data were collected through study of documents, holding of interviews (see Table 9), enquiries on the phone, and observations in the Green River area and Helhoek. Interactions were maintained with Delft Hydraulics, the pressure group Groessen in Protest (GRIP), the students’ project of Liemers College in Zevenaar, and members of the European SIRCH project.

Table 9 Number of interviews held

The study applies the system-oriented approach, by looking at interactions between stakeholders that create the commonalities in the language and the cultural cement that bind the actors. This approach contrasts with actor-oriented stakeholder studies that collect data of individual actors as if they were isolated units, and statistically process these data at an aggregate level. To be certain, the present study includes divergent perspectives and interests of individual stakeholders and stakeholder groups, but does not regard such divergence as the only part of social reality that counts (Van der Werff and Gupta 2001).

Nearly all cited texts were given in response to questions asked by the researcher. Direct speech is used in order to emphasise the subjective, though shared, story lines that were found to predominate in Green River area. The citations in spoken language indicate the thinking of local stakeholders about how to deal with future management alternatives.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Werff, P.E. Stakeholder responses to future flood management ideas in the Rhine River Basin: nature or neighbour in Hell’s Angle. Reg Environ Change 4, 145–158 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0073-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0073-z

Keywords

Navigation