Advertisement

Cognition, Technology & Work

, Volume 19, Issue 2–3, pp 303–313 | Cite as

Sustainable usage through emotional engagement: a user experience analysis of an adaptive driving school application

  • Amir Dirin
  • Teemu H. Laine
  • Marko Nieminen
Original Article

Abstract

This paper explores the factors affecting sustainable usage of digital services, such as mobile learning (m-learning) applications. We define a conceptual model of digital service sustainability and its measurement indicators and criteria. We assess the conceptual model by applying it to an adaptive m-learning application, which provides theory and assessment for driving school students based on their competence and learning progress. Additionally, the application provides mandatory self-evaluation reports to instructors after each practical driving session. The application assessment focused on how students’ performed the predefined tasks at a usability laboratory. The assessment was based on educational components in conjunction with user experience factors of delightfulness, adjustability, satisfaction, and reliability. The key qualitative performance aspects proved to be user-centered (e.g. individual differences in cognitive and learning capabilities), UI-focused (e.g. interaction and adaptability to screen resolution), and content-related (e.g. contextual delivery, emotional appeal, adaptability). These elements resulted in overall delightful and effortless experience. The evaluation results indicate that the user experience factors impact sustainable usage because students are emotionally attached to the application. Therefore, we suggest that emotional attachment assessment results may serve as an indicator for sustainability of m-learning applications. These results help mobile application designers to design sustainable applications.

Keywords

Sustainable usage User experience factors Emotional engagement Driver’s license application 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Jouko Kalliola at Haaga Driving School Ltd for continuous support to this project. The paper was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Project NRF-2015R1C1A1A02036469).

References

  1. Allen TFH, Hoekstra TW (1992) Toward a definition of sustainability. Environ Sci 15:98–107Google Scholar
  2. Ardito C, Costabile MF, Lanzilotti R, Montinaro F (2007) Towards the evaluation of UX. Int Conf HCI 2007:6–9Google Scholar
  3. Broadhurst PL (1957) Emotionality and the Yerkes–Dodson law. J Exp Psychol 54:345–352. doi: 10.1037/h0049114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown BJ, Hanson ME, Liverman DM, Merideth RW (1987) Global sustainability: toward definition. Environ Manag 11:713–719. doi: 10.1007/BF01867238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brusilovsky P, Miller P (2001) Course delivery system for virtual university. In: Tschang FT, Della Senta T (eds) Access to Knowledge: New Information Technologies and the Emergence of the Virtual University. Pergamon Press, Amsterdam, pp 167–206Google Scholar
  6. Coan JA, Gottman JM (2007) The specific affect coding system (SPAFF). In: Coan JA, Allen JJB (eds) Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Oxford University Press, NY, USA, pp 267–285Google Scholar
  7. Conner TS, Tennen H, Fleeson W, Barrett LF (2009) Experience sampling methods: a modern idiographic approach to personality research. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 3:292–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00170.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dillon A, Morris MG (1996) User acceptance of information technology: theories and models. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 31:3–33Google Scholar
  9. Dirin A, Casarini M (2014) Adaptive m-learning application for driving licenses candidates based on UCD framework for m-learning application development. In: 6th International conference on computer supported educationGoogle Scholar
  10. Dirin A, Nieminen M (2015) mLUX: usability and user experience development framework for m-learning. Int J Interact Mob Technol 9(3):37–51. doi: 10.3991/ijim.v9i3.4446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Du X, Jiao J, Tseng MM (2006) Understanding customer satisfaction in product customization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:396–406. doi: 10.1007/s00170-005-0177-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunn JR, Schweitzer ME (2005) Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. J Pers Soc Psychol 88:736–748. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eaton SE (2010) Formal, non-formal and informal learning: the case of literacy and language learning in Canada, Heather LGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekman P (1999) Basic emotions. Cognition 98:45–60Google Scholar
  15. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1978) Facial action coding system: a technique for the measurement of facial movement. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Entwistle N (1988) Motivational factors in students’ approaches to learning. Learn Strateg Learn Styles. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_2 Google Scholar
  17. Fontijn W, Hoonhout J (2007) Functional fun with tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings—DIGITEL 2007: first IEEE international workshop on digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning, pp 119–123Google Scholar
  18. Glanznig M (2012) User experience research: modelling and describing the subjective. INDECS 10:235–247. doi: 10.7906/indecs.10.3.3 Google Scholar
  19. Gorlatch S, Kameda T, Fujita IH et al (2006) Towards developing adjustable software: a case study with the Lyee approach. In: Proceedings of the 2006 conference on new trends in software methodologies, tools and techniques, IOS Press Inc, Amsterdam, Quebec, Canada, pp 423–438Google Scholar
  20. Hassenzahl M, Eckoldt K, Diefenbach S et al (2013) Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness. Int J Des 7:21–31Google Scholar
  21. Haverila M (2011) Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repurchase intent among male users. Australas Mark J 19:238–246. doi: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2011.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hertzum M (2010) Images of usability. Int J 26:567–600. doi: 10.1080/10447311003781300 Google Scholar
  23. Herzberg F (2003) One more time: how do you motivate employees?. Harv Bus Rev 81(1):87–96MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Ibrahim ENM, Walid N (2014) Trust contributing factors in m-learning technology. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 129:554–561. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keinonen T (2008) User-centered design and fundamental need. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: building bridges—Nord’08 211. doi: 10.1145/1463160.1463183
  26. Kim KJ, Park E, Sundar SS, del Pobil AP (2012) The effects of immersive tendency and need to belong on human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interact—HRI’12, pp 207–208. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157758
  27. Kreibig SD (2010) Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review. Biol Psychol 84:394–421. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kwong Ka Kei K (2006) Effects of service delivery on customer delight: an experimental approach in a restaurant chain (Dissertation). City University of Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  29. Law EL-C, Roto V, Hassenzahl M et al (2009) Understanding, scoping and defining user experience. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computer systems—CHI 09 719. doi: 10.1145/1518701.1518813
  30. Lee U, Lee J, Ko M et al (2014) Hooked on smartphones: an exploratory study on smartphone overuse among college students. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 2327–2336Google Scholar
  31. Liu Y, Li H, Carlsson C (2010) Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: an empirical study. Comput Educ 55:1211–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marcus A (2007) Fun! fun! fun! in the user experience we just wanna have fun…don’t we? interactions 14:48Google Scholar
  33. Morse N (1997) Satisfactions in the white-collar job. Arno Press, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Nicolás O, Carlos J, Aurisicchio M (2011) The Scenario of User Experience. In: DS 68-7: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering design (ICED 11), impacting society through engineering design. Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  35. Nielsen J, Norman D (2015) The definition of user experience. Retrieved on February 15 2017:https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/
  36. Norman DA (2004) Emotional design. Ubiquity 2004:1. doi: 10.1145/966012.966013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Neill B (2012) Trust in the information society. Comput Law Secur Rev 28:551–559. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2012.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peacock E, Wong P (1990) The stress appraisal measure (SAM): a multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress Med 6:227–236. doi: 10.1002/smi.2460060308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Penzenstadler B (2013) Towards a definition of sustainability in and for software engineering. In: 28th Annual ACM symposium on applied computing, pp 1183–1185. doi: 10.1145/2480362.2480585
  40. Penzenstadler B, Bauer V, Calero C, Franch X (2012) Sustainability in software engineering: a systematic literature review. In: 16th International conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (EASE 2012), pp 32–41. doi: 10.1049/ic.2012.0004
  41. Postareff L, Mattsson M, Lindblom-Ylänne S, Hailikari T (2016) The complex relationship between emotions, approaches to learning, study success and study progress during the transition to university. High Educ. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0096-7 Google Scholar
  42. Pu P, Chen L, Hu R (2012) Evaluating recommender systems from the user’s perspective: survey of the state of the art. User Model User Adapt Interact 22:317–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pucillo F, Cascini G (2014) A framework for user experience, needs and affordances. Des Stud 35:160–179. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2013.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qu Q-X, Zhang L, Chao W-Y, Duffy VG (2016) User experience design based on eye-tracking technology: a case study on smartphone APPs. In: Duffy VG (ed) Advances in applied digital human modeling and simulation. Springer, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41627-4_27
  45. Quan C, Ren F (2010) Sentence emotion analysis and recognition based on emotion words using Ren-CECps. Int J Adv Intell 2:105–117Google Scholar
  46. Rodden K, Hutchinson H, Fu X (2010) Measuring the user experience on a large scale: user-centered metrics for web applications. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 2395–2398. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753687
  47. Roto V, Law E, Vermeeren A, Hoonhout J (2010) User experience white paper: bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. Dagstuhl seminar on demarcating user experience, September 15–18. Retrieved on February 15 2017:http://www.allaboutux.org/files/UX-WhitePaper.pdf
  48. Ruth JA, Brunel FF, Otnes CC (2002) Linking thoughts to feelings: investigating cognitive appraisals and consumption emotions in a mixed-emotions context. J Acad Mark Sci 30:44–58. doi: 10.1177/03079459994317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scherer KR (2005) What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc Sci Inf 44:695–729. doi: 10.1177/0539018405058216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seong DSK (2006) Usability guidelines for designing mobile learning portals. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on mobile technology, applications and systems—Mobil’06, p 25. doi: 10.1145/1292331.1292359
  51. Strapparava C, Mihalcea R (2008) Learning to identify emotions in text. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on applied computing—SAC’08, p 1556. doi: 10.1145/1363686.1364052
  52. Sun PC, Tsai RJ, Finger G et al (2008) What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput Educ 50:1183–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sung E, Mayer RE (2012) Students’ beliefs about mobile devices Vs. desktop computers in South Korea and the United States. Comput Educ 59:1328–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Teplan M (2002) Fundamentals of EEG measurement. Meas Sci Rev 2:1–11. doi: 10.1021/pr070350l Google Scholar
  55. Tichon JG, Wallis G, Riek S, Mavin T (2014) Physiological measurement of anxiety to evaluate performance in simulation training. Cognit Technol Work 16:203–210. doi: 10.1007/s10111-013-0257-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tullis T, Albert B (2013) Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  57. Turner CW (2011) A strategic approach to metrics for user experience designers. J Usability Stud 6:52–59Google Scholar
  58. Turner P, Turner S (2013) Emotional and aesthetic attachment to digital artefacts. Cognit Technol Work 15:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verkasalo H, López-Nicolás C, Molina-Castillo FJ, Bouwman H (2010) Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications. Telemat Inform 27:242–255. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2009.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/t03592-000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolpe J (1996) Cognitive therapy: basics and beyond. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 27:319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Information TechnologyHaaga-Helia University of Applied SciencesHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Information and Computer EngineeringAjou UniversitySuwonRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceAalto UniversityEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations