Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of previous experience when introducing a decision aid in a decision support system for supply chain management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision Support Systems (DSSs) in the domain of Industrial Engineering and Management can be very powerful tools, but more knowledge about the way users utilize these systems is required. In the current research, we evaluated the effect of previous experience with a task on users’ willingness to accept a suggested decision aid and their performance in a supply chain management system. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three between-participants groups: the No Aid Group, which did not receive any decision aid during the interaction; the Aid Group, which was offered an algorithm, at the beginning of the first session, to help members improve their decisions; and the Mid-term Aid Group, which received, at the beginning of the second session, the same algorithm that was offered to the Aid Group. Participants were tested separately. The results demonstrated that in the second session, the performance of the Aid Group was significantly better in comparison with the No Aid Group. The Mid-term Aid Group’s performance did not show any gain, although both the Aid and Mid-term Aid Groups made similar use of the aid in this session. We concluded that in a DSS, having previous experience with the task before introducing the decision aid compared to having previous experience with the task and with the decision aid is not recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey NR, Scerbo MW (2007) Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: the role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 8(4):321–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann UW (2013) Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Manag Sci 59:1800–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostian AA, Holt CA, Smith AM (2008) Newsvendor “pull-to-center” effect: adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 10:590–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehlmann U, Ragsdale CT, Gfeller B (2000) A spreadsheet-based decision support system for wood panel manufacturing. Decis Support Syst 29:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corritore CL, Kracher B, Wiedenbeck S (2003) On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. Int J Hum Comput Stud 58:737–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzindolet MT, Pierce LG, Beck HP, Dawe LA (2002) The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Hum Factors 44:79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzindolet MT, Peterson SA, Pomranky RA, Pierce LG, Beck HP (2003) The role of trust in automation reliance. Int J Hum Comput Stud 58:697–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankowski RJ Kantowitz BH, Kantowitz SC (1994) Driver acceptance of unreliable route guidance information. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th annual meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 1062–1066

  • Ho TH, Lim N, Cui TH (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: a structural analysis. Manag Sci 56:1891–1910

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GC, Taylor JC (1998) Administering the MIT Beer game: lessons learned. Dev Bus Simul Exp Learn 25:208–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantowitz BH, Hankowski RJ, Kantowitz SC (1997) Driver acceptance of unreliable traffic information in familiar and unfamiliar settings. Hum Factors 39:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapanoglu M, Miller WA (2004) An evolutionary algorithm-based decision support system for managing flexible manufacturing. Robot Comput Aided Manuf 20:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacson FC, Wiegmann DA, Madhavan P (2005) Effects of attribute and goal framing on automation reliance and compliance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th annual meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 482–486

  • Layton C, Smith PJ, McCoy CE (1994) Design of cooperative problem-solving system for en-route flight planning: an empirical evaluation. Hum Factors 36:94–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JD, Moray N (1992) Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics 35:1243–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JD, Moray N (1994) Trust, self confidence and operators’ adaptation to automation. Int J Hum Comput Stud 40:153–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Howley E, Duggan J (2009) Optimisation of the Beer Distribution Game with complex customer demand patterns. In: IEEE Congress on evolutionary computation, 2009, CEC’09, pp 2638–2645. IEEE

  • Madhavan P, Wiegmann DA, Lacson FC (2006) Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids. Hum Factors 48:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moray N, Inagaki T, Itoh M (2000) Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. J Exp Psychol Appl 6:44–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir BM, Moray N (1996) Trust in automation: part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics 39:429–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Human and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Factors 39:230–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman R, Molloy R, Singh IL (1993) Performance consequences of automation-induced complacency. Int J Aviat Psychol 3:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park C, Song J, Kim J-G, Kim I (1999) Delivery date decision support system for the large scale make-to-order manufacturing companies: a Korean electric motor company case. Prod Plan Control 10:585–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid G, Rafaeli S (2000) Multi player, Internet and Java-based simulation games: learning and research in implementing a computerized version of the “Beer-Distribution Supply Chain Game”. Simul Ser 32:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Croson R (2013) Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: an experimental study. Manag Sci 59:2502–2517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice R, Keller D (2009) Automation reliance under time pressure. Cognit Technol 14:36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley V (1996) Operator reliance on automation: theory and data. In: Parasuraman R, Moulouas M (eds) Automation and human performance: Theory and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruël G, van Donk DP, van der Vaart T (2006) The beer game revisited: relating risk-taking behaviour and bullwhip effect. In: Proceedings of EurOMA, pp 403–412

  • Schiffels S, Fügener A, Kolisch R, Jens Brunner O (2014) On the assessment of costs in a newsvendor environment: insights from an experimental study. Omega 43:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: experimental evidence. Manag Sci 46:404–420

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman J (1984) Instructions for running the beer distribution game. Systems Dynamics Group, Sloan School of Management, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan G, Lewandowsky S (1996) A comparison of operator trust in humans versus machines. In: CybErg 96 virtual conference. Retrieved May (Vol 16, p 2000)

  • Waern Y, Ramberg R (1996) People’s perception of human and computer advice. Comput Hum Behav 12:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waern Y, Hägglund S, Löwgren J, Rankin I, Sololnicki T, Steinmann A (1992) Communication knowledge for knowledge communication. Int J Man Mach Stud 37:215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu DY, Katok E (2006) Learning, communication, and the bullwhip effect. J Oper Manag 24:839–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by ORT Braude Research Committee, Israel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirit Yuviler-Gavish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuviler-Gavish, N., Naseraldin, H. The effect of previous experience when introducing a decision aid in a decision support system for supply chain management. Cogn Tech Work 18, 439–447 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0369-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0369-z

Keywords

Navigation