Abstract
Researchers interested in performance in complex and dynamic situations have focused on how individuals predict their opponent(s) potential courses of action (i.e., during assessment) and generate potential options about how to respond (i.e., during intervention). When generating predictive options, previous research supports the use of cognitive mechanisms that are consistent with long-term working memory (LTWM) theory (Ericsson and Kintsch in Phychol Rev 102(2):211–245, 1995; Ward et al. in J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 7:231–254, 2013). However, when generating options about how to respond, the extant research supports the use of the take-the-first (TTF) heuristic (Johnson and Raab in Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 91:215–229, 2003). While these models provide possible explanations about how options are generated in situ, often under time pressure, few researchers have tested the claims of these models experimentally by explicitly manipulating time pressure. The current research investigates the effect of time constraint on option-generation behavior during the assessment and intervention phases of decision making by employing a modified version of an established option-generation task in soccer. The results provide additional support for the use of LTWM mechanisms during assessment across both time conditions. During the intervention phase, option-generation behavior appeared consistent with TTF, but only in the non-time-constrained condition. Counter to our expectations, the implementation of time constraint resulted in a shift toward the use of LTWM-type mechanisms during the intervention phase. Modifications to the cognitive-process level descriptions of decision making during intervention are proposed, and implications for training during both phases of decision making are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Belling PK, Suss J, Ward P (2013) Investigating constraints on decision making strategies. In: Chaudet H, Pellegrin L, Bonnardel N (eds) Proceedings of the 11th international conference on naturalistic decision making (NDM 2013), Marseille, France, 21–24 May 2013. Arpege Science Publishing, Paris, pp 133–136
Chabris CF, Hearst ES (2003) Visualization, pattern recognition, and forward search: effects of playing speed and sight of the position on grandmaster chess errors. Cogn Sci 27(4):637–648
Ericsson KA, Kintsch W (1995) Long term working memory. Psychol Rev 102(2):211–245
Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391
Gobet F, Simon HA (1996) The roles of recognition processes and look-ahead search in time-constrained expert problem solving: evidence from grand-master-level chess. Psychol Sci 7(1):52–55
Hick WE (1952) On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exp Psychol 4:11–26
Hoffman RR, Ward P, Feltovich PJ, DiBello L, Fiore SM, Andrews DH (2013) Accelerated learning: training for high proficiency in a complex world. Psychology Press, New York
Johnson JG, Raab M (2003) Take the first: option-generation and resulting choices. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 91:215–229
Klein GA (1993) A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood, pp 138–147
Klein GA (1995) Characteristics of skilled option-generation in chess. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 62(1):63–69
Klein GA, Peio KJ (1989) Use of a prediction paradigm to evaluate proficient decision making. Am J Psychol 321–331
Klein GA, Calderwood R, Macgregor D (1989) Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 19(3):462–472
Lassiter GD (2000) The relative contributions of recognition and search-evaluation processes to high-level chess performance: comment on Gobet and Simon. Psychol Sci 11(2):172–173
Moxley JH, Ericsson KA, Charness N, Krampe RT (2012) The role of intuition and deliberative thinking in experts’ superior tactical decision-making. Cognition 124(1):72–78
Osman A, Lou L, Muller-Gethman H, Rinkenauer G, Mattes S, Ulrich R (2000) Mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff: evidence from covert motor processes. Biol Psychol 51:173–199
Raab M, Johnson JG (2007) Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. J Exp Psychol Appl 13(3):158–170
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131
von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Ward P, Williams AM (2003) Perceptual and cognitive skill development in soccer: the multidimensional nature of expert performance. J Sport Exerc Psychol 25:93–111
Ward P, Ericsson KA, Williams AM (2013) Complex perceptual-cognitive expertise in a simulated task environment. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 7:231–254
Zsambok CE, Klein G (1997) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Mahwah
Acknowledgments
We wish to acknowledge the US Soccer Federation and the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Exercise (NASPSPA) 2012 Graduate Student Research Grant for supporting this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
See Table 4.
Appendix 2
See Table 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belling, P.K., Suss, J. & Ward, P. The effect of time constraint on anticipation, decision making, and option generation in complex and dynamic environments. Cogn Tech Work 17, 355–366 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0334-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0334-2
Keywords
- Anticipation
- Decision making
- Option-generation
- Expert performance
- Long-term working memory theory
- Take-the-first heuristic