Skip to main content
Log in

Human factors aspects of ICT for crisis management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a closer look at how to support humans in the crisis loop, based on a thorough understanding of the macrocognitive functions that have to be fulfilled, such as naturalistic decision making, sensemaking, coordination and communication, and planning and adaptation. The objectives of the paper are to review work to date—along with selected illustrative examples—in order to identify possible directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Downloadable from http://www2.parc.com/istl/projects/ach/ach.html.

References

  • Adelman L, Tolcott MA, Bresnick TA (1993) Examining the effect of information order on expert judgment. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 56:348–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adelman L, Bresnick T, Black PK, Marvin FF, Sak SG (1996) Research with patriot air defense officers: examining information order effects. Hum Factors 38:250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberts DS, Hayes RE (2007) Planning: complex endeavors. DoD Command and Control Research Program, Washington, DC, available at: http://www.dodccrp.org

  • Artman H, Garbis C (1998) Situation awareness as distributed cognition. In: Green T, Bannon L, Warren C, Buckley J (eds) Cognition and cooperation. Proceedings of 9th conference of cognitive ergonomics. Limerick, Republic of Ireland, pp 151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickensderfer EL, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1997) Fostering shared mental models through team self-correction: theoretical bases and propositions. In: Beyerlein MM, Johnson DA, Beyerlein S (eds) Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, vol 4. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 249–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickensderfer EL, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1998) Cross-training and team performance. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 299–311

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blickensderfer EL, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Baker DP (2000) Analyzing knowledge requirements in team tasks. In: Schraagen JMC, Chipman SF, Shalin VL (eds) Cognitive task analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 431–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (1997) Team performance assessment and measurement: theories, methods, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciabue PC, Hollnagel E (1995) Simulation of cognition: applications. In: Hoc JM, Cacciabue PC, Hollnagel E (eds) Expertise and technology: cognition and human–computer cooperation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderwood R, Klein GA, Crandall BW (1988) Time pressure, skill, and move quality in chess. Am J Psychol 101:481–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) (1998) Decision making under stress: implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse SA (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Castellan NJ Jr (ed) Individual and group decision making: current issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 221–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Tannenbaum SI, Salas E, Volpe CE (1995) Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In: Guzzo RA, Salas E (eds) Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 333–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Blickensderfer EL, Bowers CA (1998) The impact of cross-training and workload on team functioning: a replication and extension of initial findings. Hum Factors 40(1):92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MS, Freeman JT (1997) Improving critical thinking. In: Flin R, Salas E, Strub M, Martin L (eds) Decision making under stress: emerging themes and applications. Ashgate, Brookfield, pp 161–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MS, Freeman JT, Wolf S (1996) Metarecognition in time-stressed decision making: recognizing, critiquing, and correcting. Hum Factors 38(2):206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MS, Freeman JT, Thompson BT (1998) Critical thinking skills in tactical decision making: a model and a training strategy. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) Decision making under stress: implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 155–190

  • Cooke N, Gorman J (2007) Assessment of team cognition. In: Karwowski P (ed) International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. Taylor and Francis Ltd, UK, pp 270–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR (2000) Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ (eds) Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Entin EE, Serfaty D (1999) Adaptive team coordination. Hum Factors 41(2):312–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foltz PW, Bolstad CA, Cuevas HM, Franzke M, Rosenstein M, Costello AM (2008) Measuring situation awareness through automated communication analysis. In: Letsky MP, Warner NW, Fiore SM, Smith CAP (eds) Macrocognition in teams: theories and methodologies. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, pp 259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobet F, Simon HA (1996) The roles of recognition processes and look-ahead search in time-constrained expert problem solving: evidence from grandmaster level chess. Psychol Sci 7:52–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR (1987) The design of work teams. In: Lorsch J (ed) Handbook of organizational behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 315–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale JE, Dulek RE, Hale DP (2005) Crisis response communication challenges. J Bus Commun 42(2):112–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JK, Dwyer DJ, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Volpe CE (1993) Towards assessing team tactical decision making under stress: the development of a methodology for structuring team training exercises. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual interservice/industry training systems and education conference, National Security Industrial Association, Washington, DC, pp 89–98

  • Hansén D (2009) Effects of buzzwords on experiential learning: the Swedish case of ‘shared situation awareness’. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 17(3):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsdingen AS (2008) Training complex judgment: the effects of critical thinking and contextual interference (unpublished dissertation). Open University, Heerlen

  • Helsdingen AS, Van den Bosch K, Van Gog T, Van Merrienboer J (2010) The effects of critical thinking instruction on training complex decision making. Hum Factors 52(4):537–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsloot I (2005) Bordering on reality: findings on the Bonfire crisis management simulation. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 13(4):159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess KP, Freeman J, Coovert MD (2008) CENTER: critical thinking in team decision making. In: Letsky MP, Warner NW, Fiore SM, Smith CAP (eds) Macrocognition in teams: theories and methodologies. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, pp 239–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JH, Smith-Jentsch KA, Cannon-Bowers JA (1997) Performance measurement tools for enhancing team decision making. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds) Assessment and measurement of team performance: theory, research, and applications. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 45–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanki BG, Greaud VA, Irwin CM (1991) Communication variations and aircrew performance. Int J Aviat Psychol 1(2):149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein G (1989) Recognition—primed decision making. In: Rouse WB (ed) Advances in man–machine system research, vol 5. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 47–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G (1998) Sources of power: how people make decisions. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G, Calderwood R, Clinton-Cirocco A (1986) Rapid decision making on the fire ground. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the human factors society, Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, pp 576–580

  • Klein DE, Klein HA, Klein G (2000) Macrocognition: linking cognitive psychology and cognitive ergonomics, In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human interactions with complex systems, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, pp 173–177

  • Klein G, Ross KG, Moon BM, Klein DE, Hoffman RR, Hollnagel E (2003) Macrocognition. IEEE intelligent systems, pp 81–85

  • Kleinman DL, Serfaty D (1989) Team performance assessment in distributed decision-making. In: Gibson R, Kincaid JP, Goldiez B (eds) Proceedings of the interactive networked simulation for training conference. Naval Training System Center, Orlando, pp 22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimoski R, Mohammed S (1994) Team mental model: construct or metaphor? J Manag 20(2):403–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski SWJ (1998) Developing adaptive teams. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 115–153

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte TR, Consolini PM (1988) Working in practice but not in theory: theoretical challenges of “high-reliability organizations”. J Public Admin Res Theory 1:19–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz R (1993) Converging themes in the study of decision making in realistic settings. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex Publishing Corporation, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff P, Mergel I, Armstrong N (2009) Resilience in post-conflict reconstruction and natural disasters. Institute for National Security and Counterterrorism (Workshop Report, Project on Resilience and Security), Syracuse

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu JE, Goodwin GF, Heffner TS, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J Appl Psychol 85(2):273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maule AJ, Mackie PM (1990) A componential investigation of the effects of deadlines on individual decision making. In: Borcherding K, Larichev OI, Messick DM (eds) Contemporary issues in decision making, Amsterdam, pp 449–461

  • McIntyre RM, Salas E (1995) Measuring and managing for team performance: emerging principles from complex environments. In: Guzzo RA, Salas E (eds) Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 9–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Militello LG, Patterson ES, Bowman L, Wears R (2007) Information flow during crisis management: challenges to coordination in the emergency operations center. Cogn Tech Work 9(1):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu J, Salas E (1993) Team decision making in complex environments. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood, pp 327–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington N, Hastie R (1993) The story model for juror decision making. In: Hastie R (ed) Inside the juror: the psychology of juror decision making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 192–221

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin BM, Barnett BJ, Walrath L, Grossman JD (2001) Information order and outcome framing: an assessment of judgment bias in a naturalistic decision-making context. Hum Factors 43:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli EL (1989) How individuals and groups react during disasters: planning and managing implications for EMS delivery. Preliminary Paper #138. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Delaware

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli EL (1999) Disaster related social behavior: summary of 50 years of research findings. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Delaware

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 13:257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1988) Information technology: a challenge to the human factors society? Hum Factors Soci Bull 31:1–3

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rentsch JR, Hall RJ (1994) Members of great teams think alike: a model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. In: Beyerlein MM, Johnson DA (eds) Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: theories of selfmanaging work teams, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 223–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse WB, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1992) The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22(6):1296–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulke DL, Galaskiewicz J (2000) Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Manage Sci 46:612–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Dickinson TL, Converse SA, Tannenbaum SI (1992) Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In: Swezey RW, Salas E (eds) Teams: their training and performance. Ablex, Norwood, pp 3–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Prince C, Baker DP, Shrestha L (1995) Situation awareness in team performance: implications for measurement and training. Hum Factors 37:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA, Johnston JH (1997) How can you turn a team of experts into an expert team? Emerging training strategies. In: Zsambok C, Klein G (eds) Naturalistic decision making—where are we now?. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 359–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon PM, Stanton NA, Walker GH, Baber C, Jenkins DP, McMaster R, Young MS (2008) What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams. Theoretl Issues Ergono Sci 9(4):297–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samurçay R, Rogalski J (1991) A method for tactical reasoning (MTR) in emergency management: analysis of individual acquisition and collective implementation. In: Rasmussen J, Brehmer B, Leplat J (eds) Distributed decision making: cognitive models for cooperative work. Wiley, Chichester, pp 287–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaafstal AM, Johnston JH, Oser RL (2001) Training teams for emergency management. Comput Hum Behav 17:615–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraagen JMC, Eikelboom A, van Dongen CJG, te Brake G (2005) Experimental evaluation of a critical thinking tool to support decision making in crisis situations. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on information systems for crisis response and management ISCRAM 2005, 18–20 April 2005, Brussels, Belgium

  • Schraagen JMC, Klein G, Hoffman RR (2008a) The macrocognition framework of naturalistic decision making. In: Schraagen JM, Militello LG, Ormerod T, Lipshitz R (eds) Naturalistic decision making and macrocognition. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, pp 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraagen JMC, van de Ven JGM (2008) Improving decision making in crisis response through critical thinking support. J Cognitive Eng Decision Making 2(4):311–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraagen JMC, De Koning L, Hof T, Van Dongen CJG (2010a) Development of a self-rating instrument to measure team situation awareness. In: Proceedings of the 15th international command and control research and technology symposium, Santa Monica, CA, June 22–24, 2010

  • Schraagen JMC, Huis in‘t Veld M, De Koning L (2010b) Information sharing during crisis management in hierarchical vs. network teams. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 18(2):117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serfaty D, Entin EE, Johnston JH (1998) Team coordination training. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 221–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jentsch KA, Johnston JH, Payne SC (1998) Measuring team-related expertise in complex environments. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 61–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stout RJ, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1996) The role of shared mental models in developing team situational awareness: implications for team training. Training Res J 2:85–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout RJ, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Milanovich DM (1999) Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: an empirical link is established. Hum Factors 41(1):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topper CM, Carley KM (1999) A structural perspective on the emergence of network organizations. J Math Sociol 24:67–96

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van Berlo MPW (1997) Team training vs. team building and cooperative learning: defining the field of research (Report TM-97–B019) (in Dutch). TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven J, Van Rijk R, Essens P, Frinking E (2008) Network centric operations in crisis management. In: Fiedrich F, Van de Walle B (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on information systems for crisis response and management, Washington, DC, USA, May 2008

  • Weick KE, Roberts K (1993) Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm Sci Q 38(3):357–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakay D, Wooler S (1984) Time pressure, training, and decision effectiveness. Ergonomics 27:273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsambok C, Klein G (eds) (1997) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Maarten Schraagen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schraagen, J.M., van de Ven, J. Human factors aspects of ICT for crisis management. Cogn Tech Work 13, 175–187 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0175-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0175-6

Keywords

Navigation