Skip to main content
Log in

Idea generation and material consolidation: tool use and intermediate artefacts in journalistic writing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report an in-depth, longitudinal study of a freelance music journalist writing a feature article. Our analysis attends to the participant’s activities from initiation to completion, and the ways in which she established structure using tools and artefacts to support cognitive effort. We observed five work stages: establishing an initial idea; preparing for an interview; interviewing; planning the article; and writing. Each resulted in the production of a working document embodying ideas and commitments which provided a key resource for the next stage. Stages began with phases of idea generation during which ideas were spontaneously triggered through intense engagement with information resources. They finished with phases of material consolidation when intermediate artifacts were configured to facilitate generation during the next stage. We examine these in detail and use our findings to motivate a discussion of working document overview representations and specific requirements related to idea generation and material consolidation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attfield S, Blandford A, Dowell J (2003) Information seeking in the context of writing: a design psychology interpretation of the ‘problematic situation’. J Doc 59(4):430–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belotti V, Rogers Y (1997) From Web press to Web pressure: multimedia representations and multimedia publishing. In: Proceedings of CHI ’97, pp 279–286

  • Bereiter C, Scardamalia M (1987) The psychology of written communication. Erlbaum, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnardel N (1999) Creativity in design activities: the role of analogies in a constrained cognitive environment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on creativity and cognition, Loughborough, UK, pp 158–165

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1996) Creativity. Harper-Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower L, Hayes JR (1981) A cognitive process theory of writing. Coll Compos Commun 32:365–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel V, Pirolli P (1992) The structure of design problem spaces. Cogn Sci 16:395–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas C (1989) Does the medium make a difference? Two studies of writing with pen and paper and with computers. Hum Comput Interact 10:149–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas C (1996) Writing technology: studies on the materiality of literacy. Erlbaum, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen W, Haas C (1988) Reading and writing with computers: a framework for explaining differences in performance. Commun ACM 31(9):1080–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewett T (2005) Informing the design of computer-based environments to support creativity. Int J Hum Comput Stud 63:383–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollan J, Hutchins E, Kirsh D (2000). Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7(2):174–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins EL, Hollan JD, Norman DA (1986) Direct manipulation interfaces. In: Norman DA, Draper SW (eds) User centered system design. Erlbaum, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones W, Maier D (2003) Personal information management group report. NSF IDM 2003 Workshop

  • Jones W, Munat C, Bruce H, Foxley A (2005) The universal labeler: plan the project and let your information follow. In: Proceedings of the 68th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST)

  • Lawson B (1997) How designers think: the design process demystified, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans F, Davis TRV (1982) An idiographic approach to organizational behavior research: the use of single case experimental designs and direct measures. Acad Manage Rev 7(3):380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth C, Kaufer D (1989) The role of external representations in the writing process: implications for the design of hypertext-based writing tools. Proc Hypertext 89:319–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman MW, Landay JA (2000) Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: a sketch of Web site design practice. In: Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp 263–274

  • O’Hara K, Taylor A, Newman W, Sellen A (2002) Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources. Int J Hum Comput Stud 56(3):269–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe P (1987) Design thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples M (1996) An account of writing as creative design. In: Levy CM, Ransdell S (eds) The science of writing. Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 127–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman B (1999) User interfaces for creativity support tools. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on creativity cognition, pp 15–21

  • Shneiderman B (2000) Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7(1):114–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Weiss S, Ferguson G (1987) A hypertext writing environment and its cognitive basis. Proc Hypertext 87:195–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong G (1994) New directions in human-computer interaction, education, research, and practice. Interactions 2(1):69–81

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner T, Stolze M (1997) Evolution not revolution: participatory design in the toolbelt era. In: Kyng M, Mathiassen L (eds) Computers and design in context. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition—a new foundation for design. Ablex, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the principal participant in this study for her contribution. This work was funded by EPSRC grants EP/D056268 (“Making Sense of Information”) and GR/S73723 (“The Design and Use of Complex Information Spaces”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Attfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Attfield, S., Fegan, S. & Blandford, A. Idea generation and material consolidation: tool use and intermediate artefacts in journalistic writing. Cogn Tech Work 11, 227–239 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0111-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0111-6

Keywords

Navigation