Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Editorial of the special issue on “Design process and human factors integration”

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. The International Section for Research on the Prevention of Occupational Risks of the International Social Security Association (ISSA) and with the participation of ISSAs Chemistry and Machines and System Safety Sections, the French National Research and Safety Institute (INRS) organized from the 1 to March 3, 2006 in Nice (France) its 9th international conference: design process and human factors integration: optimising company performance.

References

  • Béguin P (2003) Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers Interact Comp 15:709–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt D (sous la direction de) (1999) In: Leondes CT (ed) The design of human-centred manufacturing systems, p 100

  • Chevalier A, Bonnardel N (2000) The role of constraints in creativity: a study on the design of Web sites. In: Proceedings of the XXVII international congress of psychology. Stockholm, Sweden

  • Darses F, Détienne F, Visser W (2004) Les activités de conception et leur assistance. In: Falzon P (ed) Ergonomie, PUF, Paris, pp 545–563

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Garza C (2005) L’intégration de la sécurité lors de la conception de machines à risques pour les opérateurs: comparaison de logiques différentes de conception. Pistes 7(1), février 2005

  • De la Garza C, Fadier E (2005) Towards proactive safety in design: a comparison of safety integration approaches in two design processes. Int J Cognit Technol Work IJ-CTW 7(1):51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Garza C, Fadier E (2006) Learning from experience, a theoretical framework for the work activity analysis and safe design. In: The symposium activity theories proceedings at IEA’06, 10–15 July, Maastricht, The Netherlands

  • E 09–000 (1993) Mémorandum sur la normalisation en matière de santé et de sécurité destinée à appuyer les directives « nouvelles approches ». Application au domaine des machines. AFNOR, p 36

  • Fadier E, De la Garza C (2006) Safety design: towards a new philosophy. Saf Sci 44(1):55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadier E, De la Garza C, Didelot A (2003) Safe design and human activity: construction of a theoretical framework from an analysis of a printing sector. Saf Sci 41(9):759–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falzon P (1994) Les activités méta-fonctionnelles et leur assistance. Le Travail Humain 57(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Falzon P (2006) Enabling safety: issues in design and continuous design. In: 9ème colloque international du Comité AISS Recherche “Facteurs humains et conception des systèmes de travail : optimiser les performances de l’entreprise”, Nice (France), 01–03 Mars 2006, p 11

  • Garrigou A, Thibault J-F, Jackson M, Mascia F (2001) Contributions et démarche de l’ergonomie dans les processus de conception. Revues électronique Pistes 3(2), Octobre 2001. http://www.pistes.uqam.ca/v3n2/pdf/v3n2a6.pdf

  • Hatchuel A (1996) Coopération et conception collective: variété et crises des rapports de prescription. In: de Terssac et G, Friedberg E (eds) Coopération et Conception. Octarès, Toulouse, pp 102–121

  • Hatchuel A (2002a) Sources of intensity in work organizations. Creating sustainable work systems. In: Docherty P, Forslin J, Shani ABS (eds) Emerging perspectives, practice. Routledge, London, pp 40–51

  • Hatchuel A (2002b) Towards design theory and expandable rationality. J Manage Govern 5(3–4):260–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) (2006) In: Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, p 397

  • Hollnagel D (2004) Barriers and accident prevention. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabardel P (1995) Les hommes et les technologies, une approche cognitive des instruments contemposrains. Armand Colin, Paris

  • Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci 27(2/3):183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard J-F (1995) Les activités mentales : comprendre, raisonner, trouver des solutions. Armand Colin, Paris

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente K (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computerbased work. LEA, Mahwah, NJ

  • Weill-Fassina A, Rabardel P, Dubois D (1993) Représentation pour l’action. Octarès, Toulouse

Download references

Acknowledgments

The guest editor would like to thank the journal Cognition Technology and Work and particularly Dr Pietro Carlo Cacciabue, its chief editor, for enabling him to present this special issue on safety and design and for all the help provided during its development. He would also like to thank all of the authors who contributed to the special issue and all of the referees who made it possible, by their comments and remarks, to improve the quality of the papers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INRS, Working life Department, Prevention Applied Ergonomics and Psychology Laboratory, Avenue de Bourgogne, BP 27-54501, Vandoeuvre Cedex 1, France

    Elie Fadier

Authors
  1. Elie Fadier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elie Fadier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fadier, E. Editorial of the special issue on “Design process and human factors integration”. Cogn Tech Work 10, 1–5 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0080-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0080-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation