Skip to main content
Log in

Bridging the gap between analysis and design: improving existing driver interfaces with tools from the framework of cognitive work analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two studies of train driving are presented, both within the framework of cognitive work analysis. In the first study, the modelling tool abstraction–decomposition space is adapted to routine conditions, making the analysis more representative for normal procedures. A major contribution to these analyses was the use of the method for ‘collegial verbalisation’. One particular advantage with this method over other verbalisation methods is that it supplies the analysts with data that contain much more information, but not at the expense of being more subjective. On the contrary, this method produces think-aloud protocols from video-recordings that do not have to be interpreted by the researcher. From these analyses, it was possible to distinguish information that is an intrinsic part of the train driver task from information that is dependent on the configuration and design of the current support system. The analyses show that the driver works in three rather separate time intervals with a long-range, a short-term and an immediate sense of perspective. The driver switches between these while travelling between two stations. Based on these behaviour-shaping constraints, a prototype of a planning area of a driver interface was developed, making feed-forward planning possible for the driver. Four design iterations were completed, using a user-centred system design (UCSD) approach. Early tests show that the planning area of the interface supports the feed-forward decision strategy used by drivers who prefer an active driving style. However, the driver group also made substantial changes in the design, indicating that UCSD is an efficient tool in order to capture user competencies, and to bridge the gap between analysis and design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bainbridge L (1983) Ironies of automation. Automatica 19(6):775–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer B (1992) Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. Acta Psychol 81:211–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer B, Dörner D (1993) Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study. Comput Hum Behav 9:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CENELEC (2000) European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation, European Rail Traffic Management System, Driver Machine Interface, WGA9D, prEN 50XX6-1, October 2000, Central Secreteriat, rue de Stassart 36, B-1050 Brussels

  • Endsley M (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(4):32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlandsson M, Jansson A (2006) CVCV—an information acquisition and analysis method, applied on studies of vehicle operators' work. Behav Inform Technol 198–199 (in press)

  • Endsley MR, Garland DJ (eds) (1999) Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond KR (1993) Naturalistic decision making from a Brunswikian viewpoint: its past, present, future. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ

  • Hammond KR, Hamm RM, Grassia J, Pearson T (1987) Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 17(5):753–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson A, Olsson E, Kecklund L (2000) Att köra tåg: Lokförarens arbete ur ett systemperspektiv (The driving of a train: analysis of the train drivers work by use of a system perspective). Technical report 2000-031. Institutionen för informationsteknologi, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala

  • Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kecklund L (2001) Final report on the TRAIN-project Risks and proposals for safety enhancing measures in the train driver system. Banverket, Borlänge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein GA (1989) Recognition-primed decisions. In: Rouse WB (ed) Advances in man–machine system research, vol 5. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 47–92

  • Klein GA (1993) A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ

  • Landauer TK (1995) The trouble with computers: usefulness, usability, and productivity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1985) The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 13:257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human–machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. North-Holland, New York, NY

  • Rasmussen J, Vicente KJ (1989) Coping with human errors through system design: implications for ecological interface design. Int J Man–Machine Stud 31:517–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J, Pejtersen AM, Goodstein LP (1994) Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernström R (2001) User-centred design of a train driver display. Technical report 2001-016. Institutionen för informationsteknologi, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala

  • Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Jansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jansson, A., Olsson, E. & Erlandsson, M. Bridging the gap between analysis and design: improving existing driver interfaces with tools from the framework of cognitive work analysis. Cogn Tech Work 8, 41–49 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0018-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0018-4

Keywords

Navigation