Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human factors in support of a successful railway: a review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the critical infrastructure components in most economies across the world is the rail network. In different nations rail is responsible for ensuring that there is not complete gridlock on the roads in commuter hours, and for moving both people and freight for long distances in an as efficient manner as possible. This critical role, a number of high profile accidents and proposals for new network control philosophies and systems have led to a great upsurge in human factors rail research and applications in the past few years. This paper provides a retrospective on rail human factors research covering driving, signalling and control, maintenance, incident reporting systems, passengers and the public, planning and technical systems change. This research foundation, and also current major rail human factors programmes, are placed in the context of technology, investment, competition, cultural and safety requirements and constraints. The paper concludes with an examination of where rail human factors should and will be going into the future.

Rail human factors research has grown rapidly in both quantity and quality of output over the past few years. There was an early base of work at a few institutions carried out over the 1960 s and 1970 s, followed by a lull in the 1980 s and early 1990 s. The continual influences of safety concerns, new technical system opportunities, reorganisation of the business, needs to increase effective, reliable and safe use of capacity, and increased society, media and government interest have now accelerated rail human factors research programmes in several countries. In this paper we review the literature on rail human factors research, covering driving, signalling and control, maintenance, reporting systems, passenger interests, planning and technical systems change. Current major rail human factors programmes are summarised and future research needs proposed. It is asserted that general human factors models and methods are being re-assessed, and new ones developed, to meet the requirements of the railways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boer LC (2005) Getting passengers out—evacuation behaviours. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 412–472

  • Bourne A, Carey M (2001) Integrating human factors into the development of railway systems People in Control: The Second International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, Manchester, 19–21 June 2001. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, pp 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Branton R (1979) Investigations into the skills of train driving. Ergonomics 22:155–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branton R (1993a) Train drivers’ attentional states and the design of driving cabins. In: Oborne DJ, Branton R, Leal F, Shirley P, Stewart T (eds) Person-centred ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Branton R (1993b) Ergonomics research contributions to design of the passenger environment. In: Oborne DJ, Branton R, Leal F, Shirley P, Stewart T (eds) Person-centred ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristol N (2004) Shared mental models: conceptualisation and measurement. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham

  • Buck L (1963) Errors in the perception of railway signals. Ergonomics 6:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey MS (1992) A position paper on human factors approaches for the design of VDU interfaces to computer-based railway signalling systems. HSE Contract Research Report 46

  • Cairney P (2003) Prospects of improving the conspicuity of trains at passive railway crossings, Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Civic Square, ACT, Report No. CR 217

  • Castro C, Horberry T (2004) (eds) The human factors of transport signs. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

  • Clarke S (1998) Safety culture in the UK railway network. Work Stress 12:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis L, Robins P (2001) Developing appropriate automation for signalling and train control on high speed railways. People in Control: The Second International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, Manchester, 19–21 June 2001. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London pp 255–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis L, Schmid F (2001) Human-centred design for railway applications. In: Noyes J, Bransby M (eds) People in control. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, pp 273–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordiner LA, Nichols S, Wilson JR (2001) Development of a railway ergonomics control assessment package (RECAP). In: Noyes J, Bransby M (eds) People in control: human factors in control room design. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London

  • Cotterill R, Jones H (2005) The HSE revised fatigue index in the rail industry: from application to understanding. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London (in press)

  • Davis G (2001) Human factors integration for Thameslink 2000 People in Control: The Second International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, Manchester, 19–21 June 2001. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, pp 31–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis G, Mills A (2005) A common system of passenger safety signage. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 483–493

  • De Waard D (1996) The measurement of drivers’ mental workload, PhD thesis, University of Groningen, Haren (Traffic Research Centre, The Netherlands)

  • Dicke M, Duistermaat M, Brookhuis K (2003) Evacuating a train in case of fire. In: de Waard D, Brookhuis KA, Sommer SM, Verwey WB (eds) Human factors in the age of virtual reality. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, pp 211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson MW, Pengelly M, Sime JA et al (2001) Situated learning with co-operative agent simulations in team training. Comput Hum Behav 17(5–6):547–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne R (2001) Rail traffic control system automation. What are the effects on RTC’s activity? Ergonomics for changing work. In: Proceedings of the Joint Self-ace Conference, Montreal, Quebec, 3–5 October 2001

  • Embrey D, Wright K (1999) Railway group standard for controlling the speed of tilting trains through curves—a human reliability analysis of the detection of multiple speed signs and the adoption of permitted speeds, Report No. R99/05. Human Reliability Associates, October

  • European Rail Research Advisory Council (2004). Rail research in the EU. Report of the ERRA. Brussels, May

  • Farrington-Darby T, Wilson JR, Norris BJ (2005a) Investigating train driver behaviour. The use of lineside information when regulating speed. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 60–69

  • Farrington-Darby T, Pickup L, Wilson JR (2005b) Safety culture in railway maintenance. Saf Sci 43:39–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington-Darby T, Wilson JR, Clarke T (2006) A naturalistic study of railway controllers. Ergonomics (in press)

  • Fay A, Schnieder E (1998) Information and knowledge—valuable assets used for train operation and control. In: Proceedings of Computers in the Railway, Madrid

  • Förstberg J (1997) Motion-related comfort levels in trains: a study on human responses to different tilt control strategies for a high speed train. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Report No. VTI 274-1997

  • Förstberg J (2000) Ride comfort and motion sickness in tilting trains: human responses to motion environments in train experiment and simulator experiments. Railway Technology, Dept. of Vehicle Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Report No. TRITA-FKT 2000:28

  • Förstberg J, Andersson E, Ledin T (1998) Influence of different conditions for tilt compensation on symptoms of motion sickness in tilting trains. Brain Res Bull 47(5):525–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes J, Colford N, Boughton J (2004) Early human factors assessment of a new European standard for train driver signalling information. In: McCabe PT (ed) Contemporary ergonomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

  • Garnerin X (2001) Applied graphic semiology: the map of the lyon public transport network. Inf Des J 10(1):44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbino W, Strano F (2002) Testing the interface of a cab signalling system. In: de Waard D, Brookhuis KA, Moraal J, Toffetti A (eds) Human factors in transportation, communication, health, and the workplace. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, pp 255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson WH, Megaw ED, Young MS, Lowe E (2005) The analysis of human communication errors during track maintenance. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 373–382

  • Gouin V, Sagot JC, Roussel B (2001) Train drivers’ fatigue during a seven hour daytime trip, engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics. In: Harris D (ed) Aerospace and transportation systems, vol 5. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, Hampshire, pp 455–462

  • Grabarek I (2002) Ergonomic diagnosis of the driver’s workplace in an electric locomotive. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 8(2):225–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hale AR, Heijer T, Koornneef F (2003) Management of safety roles: the case of railways. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Safety and Hygiene, Porto, Portugal, March 2003

  • Hamilton I, Clarke T (2005) Driver performance modelling and its practical application to railway safety. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 25–39

  • Health and Safety Executive (2001a) The joint inquiry into train protection systems (The Uff—Cullen Report). HSE Books, HMSO, Norwich

  • Health and Safety Executive (2001b) The Ladbroke Grove Inquiry: Part 1 (‘The Cullen Report’). HSE Books, HMSO, Norwich

  • Heath C, Svensson MS, Hindmarsh J et al (2002) Configuring awareness. Comput Supported Coop Work 11(3–4):317–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson S, Donati L, Lewis N et al (2003) An accident-based examination of factors associated with train-in-crossing collisions, fit, form and function. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Association of Canadian Ergonomists, London, Ontario, 15–18 October 2003. Association of Canadian Ergonomists, Toronto

  • Holywell P (2005) ORAM: a structured method for integrating human factors into SPAD risk assessment. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London pp 189–200

  • Howarth HD, Tepas DI (2001) Using graphs to evaluate the impact of work shifts: an experimental investigation, human factors/ergonomics: it works. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, Minneapolis/St Paul, MN, October 8–12, 2001. The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, vol 2, pp 1240–1244

  • Ilkjaer LB, Lind T (2001) Passengers’ injuries reflected carriage interior at the railway accident in Mundelstrup, Denmark. Accid Anal Prev 33(2):286–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itoh K, Andersen HB, Seki M et al (2001a) Safety culture of track maintenance organisations and its correlation with accident/incident statistics. In: Lind M (ed) Proceedings of the 20th European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 25–27, 2001. Orsted. DTU, Automation, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, pp 139–148

  • Itoh K, Arimoto M, Akachi Y (2001b) Eye-tracking applications to design of a new train interface for the japanese high-speed railway. In: Smith MJ, Salvendy G, Harris D, Koubek RJ (eds) Usability evaluation and interface design: cognitive engineering, intelligent agents and virtual reality. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 1328–1332

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh K, Seki M, Andersen HB (2003) Approaches to transportation safety methods and case studies applying to track maintenance train operations. In: Hollnagel E (ed) Handbook of cognitive task design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 603–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh K, Andersen HB, Seki M (2004) Track maintenance train operators’ attitudes to job, organisation and management, and their correlation with accident/incident rate. Cogn Technol Work 6(2):63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson A, Olsson A, Kecklund L (2005) Acting or reacting? A cognitive work analysis approach to the train driver task. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 40–49

  • Johnsen SO, Herrera IA, Vatn J, Rosness R (2005) Cross border railway operations: building safety at cultural interfaces. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 393–409

  • Jorna R, van Wezel W, Kiewiet DJ, de Boer T (2005) Analysis and support of planning in the Dutch Railroad Company. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 285–295

  • Kauppi A, Wikström J, Hellström P, Sandblad B, Andersson AW (2005) Future train traffic control, control by re-planning. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 296–305

  • Kecklund L (2002) The TRAIN-project: a human factors perspective on risks in the train driver system and suggestions for safety enhancing measures, humans in a complex environment. In: Caldenfors D, Eklund J, Kiviloog L (eds) Proceedings of the 34th Congress of the Nordic Ergonomics Society, Kolmarden, Sweden, 1–3 October 2002. Division of Industrial Ergonomics, Linkoping University, Linkoping, vol II, pp455–460

  • Kecklund L, Olsson E, Jansson A, Kecklund G, Ingre M (2003) The TRAIN-project: effects of organizational factors, automatic train control, work hours and environment: suggestions for safety enhancing measures. In: Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Denver, CO, 13–17 October, 2003. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp 1835–1839

  • Kirwan B (2000) Soft systems, hard lessons. Appl Ergon 31:663–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamel L, Bennacef S, Gauvain JL et al (2002) User evaluation of the MASK Kiosk, Speech Commun 38(1–2):131–139

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton R (1998) Not working to rule: understanding procedural violations at work. Saf Sci 28:77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenior TM (1993) Analysis of cognitive processes in train traffic control. Ergonomics 36:1361–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepreux S, Abed M, Kolski C (2003) A human-centred methodology applied to decision support system design and evaluation in a railway network context. Cogn Technol Work 5(4):248–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Hamilton I, Morrisroe G, Clarke T (2005) Driver detection and recognition of lineside signals and signs at different approach speeds. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 145–157

  • Lobb B, Harre N, Suddendorf T (2001) An evaluation of a suburban railway pedestrian crossing safety programme. Accid Anal Prev 33(2):157–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe E, Turner C (2005) A human factors SPAD checklist. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London pp 182–188

  • Luff P, Heath C (2001) Naturalistic analysis of control room activities. In: Noyes J, Bransby M (eds) People in control. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, pp 151–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack Z, Broadbent S, Miller M et al (2004) Train cab ergonomics—from a driver’s perspective. In: McCabe PT (ed) Contemporary ergonomics 2004. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 281–285

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald WA, Hoffman ER (1991) Drivers’ awareness of traffic sign information. Ergonomics 34:585–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald W (2001) Train controllers interface design and mental workload. In: Noyes J, Bransby M (eds) People in control. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, pp 239–258

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod R, Walker G, Mills A (2005a) Assessing the human factors risks in extending the use of AWS. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 109–119

  • McLeod R, Walker G, Mills A (2005b) Analysing and modelling train driver performance. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 70–80

  • McNaughton A (2003) Opening address by Chief Engineer of Network Rail to the First European Conference on Rail Human Factors, New York, 13–15 October

  • Merat N, Mills A, Bradshaw M et al (2002) Allocation of attention among train drivers. In: McCabe PT (ed) Contemporary ergonomics 2002. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell L, Pickup L, Thomas S, Watts D (2005) Assessment of new workload tools for the rail industry. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 330–340

  • Morlok EK, Nitzberg BF, Lai L (2004) Boarding and alighting injury experience with different station platform and car entranceway designs on us commuter railroads. Accid Anal Prev 36(2):261–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrisroe G (2005) Application of industrial-strength workload assessment tools. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 341–349

  • Nichols S, Bristol N, Wilson JR (2001) Workload assessment in railway control. In: Harris D (ed) Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, vol 5: aerospace and transportation systems. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hampshire, pp 463–470

  • Norris BJ, Wilson JR (2003) In: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Rail Human Factors, York, 13–15 October. Centre for Rail Human Factors, Institute for Occupational Ergonomics, University of Nottingham

  • Olsson K, Aldrin C, Karlsson S, Danielsson M (1996) Technology driven changes of train dispatch centres. In: Human factors in organisational design and management, vol 5. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 49–54

  • Pasquini A, Rizzo A, Save L (2004) A methodology for the analysis of SPAD. Saf Sci 42(5):437–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickup L, Wilson JR, Sharples S, Norris B, Clarke T, Young MS (2005a) Fundamental examinations of mental workload in the rail industry. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6(6):463–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickup L, Wilson J, Nichols S, Smith S (2005b) A conceptual framework of mental workload and the development of a self reporting integrated workload scale for railway signallers. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 319–329

  • Pickup L, Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Mitchell L, Morrisroe G (2005c) The Integrated Workload Scale (IWS): a new self report tool to assess railway signaller workload. Appl Ergon 36(6):681–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pledger S, Horbury C, Bourne A (2005) Human factors within LUL—history, progress and future. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi M, Meshkati M (2001) Human factors in highway-rail crossing accidents: the influence of driver decision style. In: McGehee DV, Lee JD, Rizzo M, Holeton K, Lopes T (eds) Proceedings of the International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Aspen, Colorado, August 14–17, 2001. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, pp 332–337

  • Rail Safety and Standards Board (2004) Human factors research catalogue. RSSB, London

  • Reid M, Ryan M, Clark M, Brierley N, Bales P (2000) Case study—predicting signaller workload. In: Proceedings of the IRSE Younger Members Conference 2000

  • Rich KJNC, Sutherland AM, O’flanagan B et al (2002) The development of a hand held terminal for use in possession management by railway trackside workers. In: McCabe PT (ed) Contemporary ergonomics 2002. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 196–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach GD, Dorrian J, Fletcher A et al (2001) Comparing the effects of fatigue and alcohol consumption on locomotive engineers’ performance in a rail simulator. J Hum Ergol 30(1–2):125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Rookmaaker DP, de Bruijn DW, Weeda CE, Koedijk MPHJ, Zwartenkot JL (2005) Ergonomics relating to the migration of lineside signals to ETCS L2 cab signals. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 171–181

  • Rosmuller N, Beroggi GEG (2004) Group decision making in infrastructure safety planning. Saf Sci 42(4):325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RSSB (2005) How safe is safe enough? Report of the Rail Safety and Standards Board, London

  • Sheridan TB, Masquelier T, Hutchings C (2001) Safety enhancement by PDA: two novel examples. In: Johannsen G (ed) Analysis, design and evaluation of human–machine systems. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjerve AB, Ludvigsen J, Neset T (2002) Identification of qualifications for train-dispatcher trainees. In: de Waard D, Brookhuis KA, Moraal J, Toffetti A (eds) Human factors in transportation, communication, health, and the workplace. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, pp 445–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Slamen A, Coleman N (2005) The application of ergonomics to standards development for VDU based signalling control systems. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 239–250

  • Slamen A, Schock A, Ryan B, Wilson JR (2004) Human factors analysis of the work of the engineering supervisor. Restricted report of Network Rail, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinicke WH, Meissner T (2003) The project European driver’s desk (EUDD)—a multidisciplinary approach towards the future modular train, ergonomics in the digital age. In: Proceedings of the XVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the Seventh Joint Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Korea and the Japan Ergonomics Society, Seoul, Korea, 24–29 August, 2003, vol 3. Ergonomics Society of Korea, Seoul

  • Suzuki H, Shiroto H (2002) Evaluation of the riding comfort due to the car body tilt of railway vehicles. Jpn J Ergon 38(3):135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki H, Tanaka A, Omino K, Shiroto H (1999) Discomfort due to the floor tilt of railway vehicles. Jpn J Ergon 35:323–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimbleby H, Blandford A, Cairns P et al (2002) User interface design as systems design, people and computers XVI—memorable yet invisible: In: Faulkner X, Finlay J, Detienne F (eds) Proceedings of HCI 2002. Springer, London, pp 281–301

  • Torsi S, Rizzo A, Pozzi S et al (2003) Designing documents for train operators: a contribution to graphic design from cultural psychology. Inf Des J Doc Des 11(2–3):123–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Traverso C (2000) ‘Railways agree ERTMS specifications’. Int Rail J May:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner C, Harrison R, Lowe E (2003) Development of a human factors SPAD hazard checklist. In: McCabe PT (ed) Contemporary ergonomics 2003. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 385–390

    Google Scholar 

  • UIC (1998) ERTMS (ETCS/EIRENE) MMI: The man machine interface of the European training control system and the European radio system for railways. Report of Union Internationale des Chemins de Fer, Paris (ISBN 90-804601-1-7)

  • Van der Flier, Schoonman (1988) Railway signals passed at danger: situational and personal factors. Appl Ergon 19:235–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen F (2001) A non-probabilistic prospective and retrospective human reliability analysis method—application to railway system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 71(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen F, Telle B (1998) Consequence analysis of human unreliability during railway traffic control. In: Proceedings of Computers in the Railway, Madrid

  • Van der Schaaf T, Wright L (2005) The development of PRISMA-rail: a generic root cause analysis approach for the railway industry. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 413–421

  • Van der Weide (1999) Assessment of comfort requirements related to curves and turnouts. Arbo Management Groep/Ergonomics, Utrecht, Report No. 2056e, March

  • Wallace B, Ross A, Davies JB (2003) Applied hermeneutics and qualitative safety data: the CIRAS project. Hum Relat 56(5):587–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock W, Pethick J, Mills A (2005) Driver vigilance devices. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London pp120–130

  • Wigglesworth EC (2001) A human factors commentary on innovations at railroad-highway grade crossings in Australia. J Saf Res 32(3):309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde GJ, Stinson JF (1983) The monitoring of vigilance in locomotive engineers. Int J Accid Anal Prev 15:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsdon M, Muir H (2005) CIRAS—history and issues arising during development. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 422–428

  • Wilson JR (1994) Devolving ergonomics: the key to ergonomics management programmes. Ergonomics 37:579–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Morrisroe G (2005) Systems analysis and design. In: Wilson JR, Corlett EN (eds) Evaluation of human work, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 241–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Cordiner L, Nichols S, Norton L, Bristol N, Clarke T, Roberts S (2001) On the right track: systematic implementation of ergonomics in railway network control. Cogn Technol Work 3:238–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) (2005a) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London

  • Wilson J, Pickup L, Norris B, Nichols S, Mitchell L (2005b) Understanding of mental workload in the railways. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 309–318

  • Wood J (2005) Ergonomics standards in the UK rail industry. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 515–524

  • Wright L, Van der Schaaf T (2005) Near miss versus accident causation in the UK railway industry. In: Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing, London, pp 429–437

  • Zarboutis N, Marmaras N (2004) Searching efficient plans for emergency rescue through simulation: the case of a metro fire. Cogn Technol Work 6(2):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwartenkot JL, De Bruijn DW, Rookmaaker DP et al (2002) Dual signalling at railways in The Netherlands: ergonomics aspects of the transition period of two control systems. Tijdschrift voor Ergon 27(1):20–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the funding for their rail research provided by, amongst others, Network Rail, RSSB, Rail Research UK (EPSRC), Serco and EURNEX. They are also grateful for the collaboration over the years on rail human factors work with their colleagues at Nottingham, especially Sarah Atkinson, Trudi Farrington-Darby, Sarah Jackson, Sarah Sharples, Laura Pickup, Brendan Ryan and Stuart Smith.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Rail Human Factors, Institute for Occupational Ergonomics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

    John R. Wilson & Beverley J. Norris

Authors
  1. John R. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beverley J. Norris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper has, with the agreement of all editors concerned, been published in substantially similar form as: Wilson J. R. and Norris B. J., 2005, Rail human factors: past, present and future. Applied Ergonomics, 36, 6, 649–660.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, J.R., Norris, B.J. Human factors in support of a successful railway: a review. Cogn Tech Work 8, 4–14 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0016-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0016-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation