Abstract
This article aims at illustrating the use of core task modelling on a system level and attempts to show its relevance to cultural assessment. The methodology that was used in a case study consists of an iterative process of core task modelling, organisational culture research and organisational assessment. The case study was conducted in a nuclear power plant's (NPP's) maintenance department. The maintenance task, its goals, critical demands and the demands for the working practices were conceptualised by core task analysis. The organisational culture of the maintenance department was explored with interviews, a survey and workgroups. The results show three critical demands and three instrumental demands to be controlled on all levels in the organisation. The maintenance culture must support the activity of balancing between these distinct requirements. The core task model was used in assessing the characteristics of the maintenance culture. This was done through analysing the unity of the personnel's conceptions concerning the organisation, its tasks, goals and values. The relevance of this approach to organisational development is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvesson M (2002) Understanding organizational culture. Sage, London
Bourrier M (1999) Constructing organisational reliability: the problem of embeddedness and duality. In: Misumi J, Wilpert B and Miller R (eds) Nuclear safety: a human factors perspective, Taylor & Francis, London
Cameron KS, Quinn RE (1999) Diagnosing and changing organisational culture: based on the competing values framework. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Charmaz K (1995) Grounded theory. In: Smith JA, Harré R and Langenhove LV (eds) Rethinking methods in psychology, Sage, London
Denzin N (1970) The research act in sociology. Butterworth, London
Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Fact 37:32–64
Engeström Y (1999) Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In: Engeström Y, Miettinen R and Punamäki R-L (eds) Perspectives in activity theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Gall J (1977) Systematics: how systems work and especially how they fail. NYT Book Co., New York
Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. J Appl Psychol 60:159–170
Hammersley M (1990) Reading ethnographic research: a critical guide. Longmans, London
Hollnagel E (2002) Understanding accidents—from root causes to performance variability. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, Scottsdale, AZ,, 15–19 September 2002
Hukki K, Norros L (1998) Subject-centered and systemic conceptualization as a tool of simulator training. Le Trav Hum 4:313–331
Isaacs WN (1993) Taking flight: dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning. Org Dynam 4:24–39
Klemola U-M, Norros L (1997) Analysis of the clinical behaviour of the anaesthetics: recognition of uncertainty as a basis for practice. Med Educ 31:449–456
Koch BA (1993) Differentiating reliability seeking organizations from other organizations: development and validation of an assessment device. In: Roberts KH (ed) New challenges to understanding organizations, Macmillan, New York
Laakso K, Pyy P and Reiman L (1998) Human errors related to maintenance and modifications. STUK-YTO-TR 139
Moubray J (1992) Reliability-centered maintenance. Industrial, New York
Norros L (1998) Evaluation and development of process operators' working practices. In: Vanttola T (ed) The Finnish research programme on reactor safety 1995–1998, Final Symposium, VTT Symposium 189:187–198 Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo
Norros L, Klemola U-M (1999) Methodological considerations in analysing anaesthetists' habits of action in clinical situations. Ergonomics 42(11):1521–1530
Norros L, Nuutinen M (2002) The concept of the core-task and the analysis of working practices. In: Borham N, Samurcay R and Fischer M (eds) Work process knowledge, Routledge, London
NRC (1986) Human reliability Impact on inservice inspection. NUREG / CR–4436. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books, New York
Pyy P (2001) An analysis of maintenance failures at a nuclear power plant. Reliab Engin Sys Safe 72(3):293–302
Quinn RE (1988) Beyond rational management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Manage Sci 29:363–377
Reiman T, Norros L (2002) Regulatory culture: balancing the different demands of regulatory practice in the nuclear industry. In: Kirwan B, Hale A and Hopkins A (eds) Changing regulation—controlling risks in society, Pergamon, Oxford
Reiman T, Oedewald P (2002) The assessment of organisational culture—a methodological study. VTT Research Notes 2140, Otamedia, Espoo
Rochlin GI (1999) Safe operation as a social construct. Ergonomics 42(11):1549–1560
Schein EH (1985) Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Schein EH (1990) Organizational culture. Amer Psychol 45(2):109–119
Schein EH (1999a) The corporate culture survival guide: sense and nonsense about culture change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Schein EH (1999b) Process consultation revisited: building the helping relationship. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Schulman PR (1993) The analysis of high reliability organizations: a comparative framework. In: Roberts KH (ed) New challenges to understanding organizations, Macmillan, New York
Silverman D (1993) Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Sage, London
Smircich L (1983) Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Admin Sci Quart 28:339–358
Svenson O, Salo I (2001) Latency and mode of error detection in a process industry. Reliab Engin Sys Safe 73(1):83–90
Turner P, Turner S (2001) Describing team work with activity theory. Cogn Technol Wk 3:127–139
Vicente K (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Wahlström B, Wilpert B, Cox S, Sola R and Rollenhagen C (2002) Learning organisations for nuclear safety. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, Scottsdale, AZ, 15–19 September 2002
Weick KE (1987) Organizational culture as a source of high reliability. Calif Manage Rev 29:112–127
Weick K E (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Yin R (1989). Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the Loviisa NPP maintenance organisation and its personnel for good cooperation and many fruitful discussions. The commitment and openness of the personnel was crucial for the success of this project. The authors also wish to thank the following persons who commented this article in its various versions: Professor Ola Svenson, Professor Carl Rollenhagen, Dr. Kari Laakso, Dr. Leena Norros and Mr. Jari Kettunen. The writing of this article was supported by the Finnish Ministry of Trade and Industry, Nordic Nuclear Safety Research (NKS), VTT and the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oedewald, P., Reiman, T. Core task modelling in cultural assessment: a case study in nuclear power plant maintenance. Cogn Tech Work 5, 283–293 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-003-0132-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-003-0132-0