Skip to main content
Log in

A spatial error model with continuous random effects and an application to growth convergence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a spatial error model with continuous random effects based on Matérn covariance functions and apply this model for the analysis of income convergence processes (\(\beta \)-convergence). The use of a model with continuous random effects permits a clearer visualization and interpretation of the spatial dependency patterns, avoids the problems of defining neighborhoods in spatial econometrics models, and allows projecting the spatial effects for every possible location in the continuous space, circumventing the existing aggregations in discrete lattice representations. We apply this model approach to analyze the economic growth of Brazilian municipalities between 1991 and 2010 using unconditional and conditional formulations and a spatiotemporal model of convergence. The results indicate that the estimated spatial random effects are consistent with the existence of income convergence clubs for Brazilian municipalities in this period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We also tested a specification of the SEM model using a distance-based weighting matrix. The results are similar, with an estimated intercept of 0.1652 and a parameter of -0.0234 to the initial income.

References

  • Abreu M, de Groot HLF, Florax RJGM (2005) Space and growth: a survey of empirical evidence and methods. Reg et Dev 21:13–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1369–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Crown, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade E, Laurini M, Madalozzo R, Pereira PLV (2004) Convergence clubs among Brazilian municipalities. Econ Lett 83(2):179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association: Lisa. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (2002) Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agr Econ 27(3):247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Rey SJ (2014) Modern spatial econometrics in practice: a guide to GeoDa, DeoDaSpace and PySAL. GeoDa Press LLC, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbia G (2006) Spatial sconometrics—Statistical foundations and applications to regional convergence. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbia G, Fingleton B (2008) New spatial econometric techniques and applications in regional science. Papers Reg Sci 87(3):311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbia G, Paelinck PJH (2003) Economic convergence or divergence? Modeling the interregional dynamics of EU regions, 1985–1999. J Geogr Syst 5(3):291–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzoni CR (2001) Economic growth and regional income inequality in Brazil. Ann Reg Sci 35(1):133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R, Sala-i Martin X (1995) Economic growth. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B. 36(2):192–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag J, York J, Mollie A (1991) Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Ann Inst Stat Math 43(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomes-Rubio V (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blangiardo M, Cameletti M (2015) Spatial and spatio-temporal models with R-INLA. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Blangiardo M, Cameletti M, Baio G, Rue H (2013) Spatial and spatio-temporal models with r-inla. Spat Spatio-temporal Epidemiol 4:33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner SC, Scott R (2007) The mathematical theory of finite element methods. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameletti M, Lindgren F, Simpson D, Rue H (2013) Spatio-temporal modeling of particulate matter concentration through the spde approach. AStA Adv Stat Anal 97:109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrado L, Fingleton B (2012) Where is the economics in spatial econometrics? J Reg Sci 52(2):210–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrado L, Martin R, Weeks M (2005) Identifying and interpreting regional convergence clusters across Europe. Econ J 115:C133–c160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravo TA, Becker B, Gourlay A (2015) Regional growth and SMEs in Brazil: a spatial panel approach. Reg Stud 49(12):1995–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N, Wikle CK (2011) Statistics for spatio-temporal data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall’erba S, Le Gallo J (2008) Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989–1999: A spatial econometric analysis. Pap Reg Sci 87(2):219–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf S, Johnson PA (1995) Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. J Appl Econ 10(4):365–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf SN, Johnson PA, Temple JR (2005) Handbook of economic growth. Chapter growth econometrics, vol 1a. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2014) Spatial econometrics: from cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP, Piras G, Arbia G (2010) Growth and convergence in a multiregional model with space-time dynamics. Geogr Anal 42(3):338–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst P, Vega SH (2013) On spatial econometric models, spillover effects. In: 53rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy”, 27–31 August 2013, Palermo, Italy, Louvain-la-Neuve. European Regional Science Association (ERSA)

  • Fischer MM, LeSage JP (2015) A Bayesian space-time approach to identifying and interpreting regional convergence clubs in Europe. Pap Reg Sci 94(4):677–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MM, Stirböck C (2006) Pan-European regional income growth and club-convergence. Ann Reg Sci 40(4):693–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MM, Stumpner P (2008) Income distribution dynamics and cross-region convergence in Europe. J Geogr Syst 10(2):109–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O (1996) Convergence? Inference from theoretical models. Econ J 106:1056–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Val R (2015) Cross-sectional growth in US cities from 1990 to 2000. J Geogr Syst 17(1):83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krainski ET, Lindgren F, Simpson D, Rue H (2016). The r-inla tutorial on spde models.www.r-inla.org

  • Laurini M, Andrade E, Valls Pereira PL (2005) Income convergence clubs for Brazilian municipalities: a non-parametric analysis. Appl Econ 37(18):2099–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurini MP (2016) Income estimation using night luminosity: a continuous spatial model. Spat Demogr 4(2):83–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurini MP, Valls Pereira PL (2009) Conditional stochastic kernel estimation by nonparametric methods. Econ Lett 105(3):234–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gallo J, Dallérba S (2006) Evaluating the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of the European convergence process, 1980–1999. J Reg Sci 46(2):269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage J, Pace RK (2014a) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP, Fischer MM (2008) Spatial growth regressions: Model specification, estimation and interpretation. Spat Econ Anal 3(3):275–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP, Pace RK (2014b) The biggest myth in spatial econometrics. Econometrics 2(4):217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim U (2016) Regional income club convergence in US BEA economic areas: a spatial switching regression approach. Ann Reg Sci 56(1):273–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren F, Rue H, Lindstrom J (2011) An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 73(4):423–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monasterio LM (2010) Brazilian spatial dynamics in the long term (1872–2000): “path dependency” or “reversal of fortune”? J Geogr Syst 12(1):51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossi MB, Aroca P, Fernandez IJ, Azzoni CR (2003) Growth dynamics and space in Brazil. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(3):393–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mur J, López F, Angulo A (2010) Instability in spatial error models: an application to the hypothesis of convergence in the European case. J Geogr Syst 12(3):259–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1997) Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. J Econ Growth 2:27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (2006) Empirical growth models with spatial effects. Pap Reg Sci 85(2):177–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramajo J, Márquez MA, Hewings GJ, Salinas MM (2008) Spatial heterogeneity and interregional spillovers in the European Union: Do cohesion policies encourage convergence across regions? Eur Econ Rev 52(3):551–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey SJ, Janikas MJ (2005) Regional convergence, inequality and space. J Econ Geogr 5(2):155–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey SJ, Montouri BD (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Reg Stud 33(2):143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozanov JA (1977) Markov random fields and stochastic partial differential equations. Math URSS Sb 32:515–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rue H, Held L (2005) Gaussian Markov random fields: theory and applications. Chapman & Hall - CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N (2009) Approximated Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 71(2):319–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i Martin X (1996a) The classical approach to convergence analysis. Econ J 106(437):1019–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i Martin X (1996b) Regional cohesion: evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40(6):1325–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson D, Lindgren F, Rue H (2012) Think continuous: Markovian Gaussian models in spatial statistics. Spat Stat 1(1):16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan TW (1956) Economic growth and capital accumulation. Econ Rec 32:334–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall MM (2004) A close look at the spatial structure implied by the CAR and SAR models. J Stat Plan Inference 121(2):311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle P (1954) On stationary processes on the plane. Biometrika 41(7):434–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Márcio Poletti Laurini.

Additional information

I thank the valuable comments and suggestions from the editor Manfred M. Fischer and three anonymous referees. The author acknowledges the financial support of CNPq and FAPESP.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 54 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix briefly presents a robustness analysis using a SPDE-Matérn model specification relying on an alternative triangulation, based on a convex grid generated by the geographic centroid of each municipality. This specification can be thought of as the most basic triangulation that preserves the existing information in the spatial distribution of municipalities, with a unique focal point for each observed region. Figure 15 shows this triangulation, constructed using only nodes generated by the geographic centroid of each municipality.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Triangulated Delauney mesh: Brazilian municipalities using centroids

The posterior distribution of the estimated parameters is shown in Table 8. We can note that the results are quite similar to those observed with the use of finer triangulation (see Table 2), showing that the results are robust to the choice of an alternative mesh. Figure 16 shows the posterior mean for spatial random effects estimated based on this alternative triangulation. In general, the results are quite similar to those observed in the original formulation. The model captures the existing precision in the distribution of points in space, with more precise confidence intervals for the regions with the highest density of points, and intervals more open in regions with lower density of points, especially in the northern region of the country. Note that this result is due to the interpolation mechanism used in the representation of the solution of the partial differential stochastic equation used in the representation of the spatial random field (see Eq. (7)), which is also used in determining the posterior distribution of spatial random effects.

Table 8 Estimation results: \(\beta \)-convergence for Brazilian municipalities, SPDE-Matérn model with alternative triangulation (1991–2010)
Fig. 16
figure 16

Posterior mean of the spatial random effects: SPDE-Matérn model with an alternative triangulation

This result also indicates that continuous representation of space can properly handle the presence of an irregular lattice structure, a major problem in model specifications with areal data, as discussed in Wall (2004). The posterior distribution of spatial random effects captures the amount of data available for density regions on the map, avoiding the problems associated with the use of spatial weights where this information is not used optimally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laurini, M.P. A spatial error model with continuous random effects and an application to growth convergence. J Geogr Syst 19, 371–398 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-017-0256-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-017-0256-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation