Abstract
We propose a spatial error model with continuous random effects based on Matérn covariance functions and apply this model for the analysis of income convergence processes (\(\beta \)-convergence). The use of a model with continuous random effects permits a clearer visualization and interpretation of the spatial dependency patterns, avoids the problems of defining neighborhoods in spatial econometrics models, and allows projecting the spatial effects for every possible location in the continuous space, circumventing the existing aggregations in discrete lattice representations. We apply this model approach to analyze the economic growth of Brazilian municipalities between 1991 and 2010 using unconditional and conditional formulations and a spatiotemporal model of convergence. The results indicate that the estimated spatial random effects are consistent with the existence of income convergence clubs for Brazilian municipalities in this period.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We also tested a specification of the SEM model using a distance-based weighting matrix. The results are similar, with an estimated intercept of 0.1652 and a parameter of -0.0234 to the initial income.
References
Abreu M, de Groot HLF, Florax RJGM (2005) Space and growth: a survey of empirical evidence and methods. Reg et Dev 21:13–44
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1369–1401
Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Crown, New York
Andrade E, Laurini M, Madalozzo R, Pereira PLV (2004) Convergence clubs among Brazilian municipalities. Econ Lett 83(2):179–184
Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association: Lisa. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115
Anselin L (2002) Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agr Econ 27(3):247–267
Anselin L, Rey SJ (2014) Modern spatial econometrics in practice: a guide to GeoDa, DeoDaSpace and PySAL. GeoDa Press LLC, Chicago
Arbia G (2006) Spatial sconometrics—Statistical foundations and applications to regional convergence. Springer, Berlin
Arbia G, Fingleton B (2008) New spatial econometric techniques and applications in regional science. Papers Reg Sci 87(3):311–317
Arbia G, Paelinck PJH (2003) Economic convergence or divergence? Modeling the interregional dynamics of EU regions, 1985–1999. J Geogr Syst 5(3):291–314
Azzoni CR (2001) Economic growth and regional income inequality in Brazil. Ann Reg Sci 35(1):133–152
Barro R, Sala-i Martin X (1995) Economic growth. MIT Press, Cambridge
Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B. 36(2):192–225
Besag J, York J, Mollie A (1991) Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Ann Inst Stat Math 43(1):1–20
Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomes-Rubio V (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R. Springer, Heidelberg
Blangiardo M, Cameletti M (2015) Spatial and spatio-temporal models with R-INLA. Wiley, Chichester
Blangiardo M, Cameletti M, Baio G, Rue H (2013) Spatial and spatio-temporal models with r-inla. Spat Spatio-temporal Epidemiol 4:33–49
Brenner SC, Scott R (2007) The mathematical theory of finite element methods. Springer, Heidelberg
Cameletti M, Lindgren F, Simpson D, Rue H (2013) Spatio-temporal modeling of particulate matter concentration through the spde approach. AStA Adv Stat Anal 97:109–131
Corrado L, Fingleton B (2012) Where is the economics in spatial econometrics? J Reg Sci 52(2):210–239
Corrado L, Martin R, Weeks M (2005) Identifying and interpreting regional convergence clusters across Europe. Econ J 115:C133–c160
Cravo TA, Becker B, Gourlay A (2015) Regional growth and SMEs in Brazil: a spatial panel approach. Reg Stud 49(12):1995–2016
Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York
Cressie N, Wikle CK (2011) Statistics for spatio-temporal data. Wiley, New York
Dall’erba S, Le Gallo J (2008) Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989–1999: A spatial econometric analysis. Pap Reg Sci 87(2):219–244
Durlauf S, Johnson PA (1995) Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. J Appl Econ 10(4):365–384
Durlauf SN, Johnson PA, Temple JR (2005) Handbook of economic growth. Chapter growth econometrics, vol 1a. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Elhorst JP (2014) Spatial econometrics: from cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Springer, Heidelberg
Elhorst JP, Piras G, Arbia G (2010) Growth and convergence in a multiregional model with space-time dynamics. Geogr Anal 42(3):338–355
Elhorst P, Vega SH (2013) On spatial econometric models, spillover effects. In: 53rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy”, 27–31 August 2013, Palermo, Italy, Louvain-la-Neuve. European Regional Science Association (ERSA)
Fischer MM, LeSage JP (2015) A Bayesian space-time approach to identifying and interpreting regional convergence clubs in Europe. Pap Reg Sci 94(4):677–702
Fischer MM, Stirböck C (2006) Pan-European regional income growth and club-convergence. Ann Reg Sci 40(4):693–721
Fischer MM, Stumpner P (2008) Income distribution dynamics and cross-region convergence in Europe. J Geogr Syst 10(2):109–139
Galor O (1996) Convergence? Inference from theoretical models. Econ J 106:1056–1069
González-Val R (2015) Cross-sectional growth in US cities from 1990 to 2000. J Geogr Syst 17(1):83–106
Krainski ET, Lindgren F, Simpson D, Rue H (2016). The r-inla tutorial on spde models.www.r-inla.org
Laurini M, Andrade E, Valls Pereira PL (2005) Income convergence clubs for Brazilian municipalities: a non-parametric analysis. Appl Econ 37(18):2099–2118
Laurini MP (2016) Income estimation using night luminosity: a continuous spatial model. Spat Demogr 4(2):83–115
Laurini MP, Valls Pereira PL (2009) Conditional stochastic kernel estimation by nonparametric methods. Econ Lett 105(3):234–238
Le Gallo J, Dallérba S (2006) Evaluating the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of the European convergence process, 1980–1999. J Reg Sci 46(2):269–288
LeSage J, Pace RK (2014a) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, Boca Raton
LeSage JP, Fischer MM (2008) Spatial growth regressions: Model specification, estimation and interpretation. Spat Econ Anal 3(3):275–304
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2014b) The biggest myth in spatial econometrics. Econometrics 2(4):217
Lim U (2016) Regional income club convergence in US BEA economic areas: a spatial switching regression approach. Ann Reg Sci 56(1):273–294
Lindgren F, Rue H, Lindstrom J (2011) An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 73(4):423–498
Monasterio LM (2010) Brazilian spatial dynamics in the long term (1872–2000): “path dependency” or “reversal of fortune”? J Geogr Syst 12(1):51–67
Mossi MB, Aroca P, Fernandez IJ, Azzoni CR (2003) Growth dynamics and space in Brazil. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(3):393–418
Mur J, López F, Angulo A (2010) Instability in spatial error models: an application to the hypothesis of convergence in the European case. J Geogr Syst 12(3):259–280
Quah D (1997) Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. J Econ Growth 2:27–59
Quah D (2006) Empirical growth models with spatial effects. Pap Reg Sci 85(2):177–198
Ramajo J, Márquez MA, Hewings GJ, Salinas MM (2008) Spatial heterogeneity and interregional spillovers in the European Union: Do cohesion policies encourage convergence across regions? Eur Econ Rev 52(3):551–567
Rey SJ, Janikas MJ (2005) Regional convergence, inequality and space. J Econ Geogr 5(2):155–176
Rey SJ, Montouri BD (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Reg Stud 33(2):143–156
Rozanov JA (1977) Markov random fields and stochastic partial differential equations. Math URSS Sb 32:515–534
Rue H, Held L (2005) Gaussian Markov random fields: theory and applications. Chapman & Hall - CRC, Boca Raton
Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N (2009) Approximated Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 71(2):319–392
Sala-i Martin X (1996a) The classical approach to convergence analysis. Econ J 106(437):1019–1036
Sala-i Martin X (1996b) Regional cohesion: evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40(6):1325–1352
Simpson D, Lindgren F, Rue H (2012) Think continuous: Markovian Gaussian models in spatial statistics. Spat Stat 1(1):16–29
Solow R (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94
Swan TW (1956) Economic growth and capital accumulation. Econ Rec 32:334–361
Wall MM (2004) A close look at the spatial structure implied by the CAR and SAR models. J Stat Plan Inference 121(2):311–324
Whittle P (1954) On stationary processes on the plane. Biometrika 41(7):434–449
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I thank the valuable comments and suggestions from the editor Manfred M. Fischer and three anonymous referees. The author acknowledges the financial support of CNPq and FAPESP.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
This appendix briefly presents a robustness analysis using a SPDE-Matérn model specification relying on an alternative triangulation, based on a convex grid generated by the geographic centroid of each municipality. This specification can be thought of as the most basic triangulation that preserves the existing information in the spatial distribution of municipalities, with a unique focal point for each observed region. Figure 15 shows this triangulation, constructed using only nodes generated by the geographic centroid of each municipality.
The posterior distribution of the estimated parameters is shown in Table 8. We can note that the results are quite similar to those observed with the use of finer triangulation (see Table 2), showing that the results are robust to the choice of an alternative mesh. Figure 16 shows the posterior mean for spatial random effects estimated based on this alternative triangulation. In general, the results are quite similar to those observed in the original formulation. The model captures the existing precision in the distribution of points in space, with more precise confidence intervals for the regions with the highest density of points, and intervals more open in regions with lower density of points, especially in the northern region of the country. Note that this result is due to the interpolation mechanism used in the representation of the solution of the partial differential stochastic equation used in the representation of the spatial random field (see Eq. (7)), which is also used in determining the posterior distribution of spatial random effects.
This result also indicates that continuous representation of space can properly handle the presence of an irregular lattice structure, a major problem in model specifications with areal data, as discussed in Wall (2004). The posterior distribution of spatial random effects captures the amount of data available for density regions on the map, avoiding the problems associated with the use of spatial weights where this information is not used optimally.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laurini, M.P. A spatial error model with continuous random effects and an application to growth convergence. J Geogr Syst 19, 371–398 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-017-0256-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-017-0256-z