Discovering the space–time dimensions of schedule padding and delay from GTFS and real-time transit data

Abstract

Schedule padding is the extra time added to transit schedules to reduce the risk of delay. Where there is more random delay, there should be more schedule padding. While schedule padding is a product of transit planners, a method for detecting when and where it exists could provide valuable feedback as transit agencies continually develop their networks. By analyzing transit schedules and real-time vehicle location data at the level of stop-to-stop segments, we can locate padding in space and time and identify the places that may be most effected by stochastic delay. Such information could be used to target delay-reduction interventions such as fare prepayment or transit-only rights of way. The Toronto Transit Commission is used as a case study, and initial results suggest that highly delayed segments appear mostly in the expected, but some surprising, places.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Bass P, Perkinson DG, Keitgen B, Dresser GB (1994) Travel forecasting guidelines. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertini R, El-Geneidy A (2003) Generating transit performance measures with archived data. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1841:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bookbinder JH, Ahlin FJ (1990) Synchronized scheduling and random delays in urban transit. Eur J Oper Res 48:204–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceder A (1987) Methods for creating bus timetables. Transp Res Part A Gener 21:59–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ceder A (2002) Urban transit scheduling: framework, review and examples. J Urban Plan Dev 128:225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chien SI-J, Ding Y, Wei C (2002) Dynamic bus arrival time prediction with artificial neural networks. J Transp Eng 128:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dessouky M, Hall R, Nowroozi A, Mourikas K (1999) Bus dispatching at timed transfer transit stations using bus tracking technology. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 7:187–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein B, Dyson L, Nemani A (2013) Beyond transparency: open data and the future of civic innovation. Code for America Press, San Francisco. http://beyondtransparency.org/

    Google Scholar 

  9. Google (2015) General transit feed specification reference. https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference. Accessed April 2015

  10. Guihaire V, Hao J-K (2008) Transit network design and scheduling: a global review. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 42:1251–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hickman MD (2001) An analytic stochastic model for the transit vehicle holding problem. Transp Sci 35:215–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy JV, Gorell R, Crinson L, Wheeler A, Elliot M (2005) Psychological traffic calming. Transport Research Laboratory, Wokingham

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mazloumi E, Currie G, Rose G (2009) Using GPS data to gain insight into public transport travel time variability. J Transp Eng 136:623–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McCartney S (2010) Why a six hour flight now takes seven. Wall Street J. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703575004575043143789789222

  15. NextBus (2015) NextBus API documentation. http://api-portal.anypoint.mulesoft.com/nextbus/api/nextbus-api/docs/concepts. Accessed Jan 2015

  16. Noland RB, Polak JW (2002) Travel time variability: a review of theoretical and empirical issues. Transp Rev 22:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Skaltsas G (2011) Analysis of airline schedule padding on US domestic routes. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. TTC (2015) GTFS data exchange. http://www.gtfs-data-exchange.com/agency/ttc/. Accessed March 2015

  19. Van Oort N, Sparing D, Brands T, Goverde RM (2012) Optimizing public transport planning and operations using automatic vehicle location data: the Dutch example. In: International conference on models and technologies for intelligent transport systems, MT-ITS, Dresden 2013

  20. Walker J (2011) Human transit: how clearer thinking about public transit can enrich our communities and our lives. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao J, Dessouky M, Bukkapatnam S (2006) Optimal slack time for schedule-based transit operations. Transp Sci 40:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zolfaghari S, Azizi N, Jaber MY (2004) A model for holding strategy in public transit systems with real-time information. Int J Transp Manag 2:99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Widener.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wessel, N., Widener, M.J. Discovering the space–time dimensions of schedule padding and delay from GTFS and real-time transit data. J Geogr Syst 19, 93–107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-016-0244-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public transportation
  • Geographic information systems
  • Scheduling
  • Transit networks
  • Planning
  • Spatiotemporal analysis

JEL Classification

  • O18
  • R42