Abstract
Schedule padding is the extra time added to transit schedules to reduce the risk of delay. Where there is more random delay, there should be more schedule padding. While schedule padding is a product of transit planners, a method for detecting when and where it exists could provide valuable feedback as transit agencies continually develop their networks. By analyzing transit schedules and real-time vehicle location data at the level of stop-to-stop segments, we can locate padding in space and time and identify the places that may be most effected by stochastic delay. Such information could be used to target delay-reduction interventions such as fare prepayment or transit-only rights of way. The Toronto Transit Commission is used as a case study, and initial results suggest that highly delayed segments appear mostly in the expected, but some surprising, places.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bass P, Perkinson DG, Keitgen B, Dresser GB (1994) Travel forecasting guidelines. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas
Bertini R, El-Geneidy A (2003) Generating transit performance measures with archived data. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1841:109–119
Bookbinder JH, Ahlin FJ (1990) Synchronized scheduling and random delays in urban transit. Eur J Oper Res 48:204–218
Ceder A (1987) Methods for creating bus timetables. Transp Res Part A Gener 21:59–83
Ceder A (2002) Urban transit scheduling: framework, review and examples. J Urban Plan Dev 128:225–244
Chien SI-J, Ding Y, Wei C (2002) Dynamic bus arrival time prediction with artificial neural networks. J Transp Eng 128:429–438
Dessouky M, Hall R, Nowroozi A, Mourikas K (1999) Bus dispatching at timed transfer transit stations using bus tracking technology. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 7:187–208
Goldstein B, Dyson L, Nemani A (2013) Beyond transparency: open data and the future of civic innovation. Code for America Press, San Francisco. http://beyondtransparency.org/
Google (2015) General transit feed specification reference. https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference. Accessed April 2015
Guihaire V, Hao J-K (2008) Transit network design and scheduling: a global review. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 42:1251–1273
Hickman MD (2001) An analytic stochastic model for the transit vehicle holding problem. Transp Sci 35:215–237
Kennedy JV, Gorell R, Crinson L, Wheeler A, Elliot M (2005) Psychological traffic calming. Transport Research Laboratory, Wokingham
Mazloumi E, Currie G, Rose G (2009) Using GPS data to gain insight into public transport travel time variability. J Transp Eng 136:623–631
McCartney S (2010) Why a six hour flight now takes seven. Wall Street J. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703575004575043143789789222
NextBus (2015) NextBus API documentation. http://api-portal.anypoint.mulesoft.com/nextbus/api/nextbus-api/docs/concepts. Accessed Jan 2015
Noland RB, Polak JW (2002) Travel time variability: a review of theoretical and empirical issues. Transp Rev 22:39–54
Skaltsas G (2011) Analysis of airline schedule padding on US domestic routes. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
TTC (2015) GTFS data exchange. http://www.gtfs-data-exchange.com/agency/ttc/. Accessed March 2015
Van Oort N, Sparing D, Brands T, Goverde RM (2012) Optimizing public transport planning and operations using automatic vehicle location data: the Dutch example. In: International conference on models and technologies for intelligent transport systems, MT-ITS, Dresden 2013
Walker J (2011) Human transit: how clearer thinking about public transit can enrich our communities and our lives. Island Press, Washington
Zhao J, Dessouky M, Bukkapatnam S (2006) Optimal slack time for schedule-based transit operations. Transp Sci 40:529–539
Zolfaghari S, Azizi N, Jaber MY (2004) A model for holding strategy in public transit systems with real-time information. Int J Transp Manag 2:99–110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wessel, N., Widener, M.J. Discovering the space–time dimensions of schedule padding and delay from GTFS and real-time transit data. J Geogr Syst 19, 93–107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-016-0244-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-016-0244-8
Keywords
- Public transportation
- Geographic information systems
- Scheduling
- Transit networks
- Planning
- Spatiotemporal analysis