Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Oriented Euler complexes and signed perfect matchings

  • Full Length Paper
  • Series B
  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents “oriented pivoting systems” as an abstract framework for complementary pivoting. It gives a unified simple proof that the endpoints of complementary pivoting paths have opposite sign. A special case are the Nash equilibria of a bimatrix game at the ends of Lemke–Howson paths, which have opposite index. For Euler complexes or “oiks”, an orientation is defined which extends the known concept of oriented abstract simplicial manifolds. Ordered “room partitions” for a family of oriented oiks come in pairs of opposite sign. For an oriented oik of even dimension, this sign property holds also for unordered room partitions. In the case of a two-dimensional oik, these are perfect matchings of an Euler graph, with the sign as defined for Pfaffian orientations of graphs. A near-linear time algorithm is given for the following problem: given a graph with an Eulerian orientation with a perfect matching, find another perfect matching of opposite sign. In contrast, the complementary pivoting algorithm for this problem may be exponential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balthasar, A.V.: Geometry and Equilibria in Bimatrix Games. PhD Thesis, London School of Economics (2009)

  2. Casetti, M.M., Merschen, J., von Stengel, B.: Finding Gale strings. Electron. Notes Discret. Math. 36, 1065–1072 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cayley, A.: Sur les déterminants gauches. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelle’s Journal) 38, 93–96 (1849)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, X., Deng, X.: Settling the complexity of two-player Nash equilibrium. In: Proceedings of 47th FOCS, pp. 261–272 (2006)

  5. Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cottle, R.W., Dantzig, G.B.: A generalization of the linear complementarity problem. J. Comb. Theory 8, 79–90 (1970)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cottle, R.W., Pang, J.-S., Stone, R.E.: The Linear Complementarity Problem. Academic Press, San Diego (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Daskalakis, C., Goldberg, P.W., Papadimitriou, C.H.: The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. SIAM J. Comput. 39, 195–259 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Eaves, B.C., Scarf, H.: The solution of systems of piecewise linear equations. Math. Oper. Res. 1, 1–27 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Edmonds, J.: Paths, trees, and flowers. Can. J. Math. 17, 449–467 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Edmonds, J.: Euler complexes. In: Cook, W., Lovasz, L., Vygen, J. (eds.) Research Trends in Combinatorial Optimization, pp. 65–68. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Edmonds, J., Gaubert, S., Gurvich, V.: Sperner oiks. Electron. Notes Discret. Math. 36, 1273–1280 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gale, D.: Neighborly and cyclic polytopes. In: Klee, V. (ed.) Convexity, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Math., Vol. 7, pp. 225–232. American Math. Soc., Providence, RI (1963)

  14. Grigni, M.: A Sperner lemma complete for PPA. Inf. Process. Lett. 77, 255–259 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hilton, P.J., Wylie, S.: Homology Theory: An Introduction to Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobi, C.G.J.: Ueber die Pfaffsche Methode, eine gewöhnliche lineäre Differentialgleichung zwischen \(2n\) Variabeln durch ein System von \(n\) Gleichungen zu integriren. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelle’s Journal) 2, 347–357 (1827)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lax, P.D.: Linear Algebra and Its Applications. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lemke, C.E.: Bimatrix equilibrium points and mathematical programming. Manag. Sci. 11, 681–689 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lemke, C.E., Grotzinger, S.J.: On generalizing Shapley’s index theory to labelled pseudomanifolds. Math. Program. 10, 245–262 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Lemke, C.E., Howson Jr, J.T.: Equilibrium points of bimatrix games. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 12, 413–423 (1964)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Lovász, L., Plummer, M.D.: Matching Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. McLennan, A., Tourky, R.: Simple complexity from imitation games. Games Econ. Behav. 68, 683–688 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Merschen, J. : Nash Equilibria, Gale Strings, and Perfect Matchings. PhD Thesis, London School of Economics (2012)

  24. Morris Jr, W.D.: Lemke paths on simple polytopes. Math. Oper. Res. 19, 780–789 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Papadimitriou, C.H.: On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 48, 498–532 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Parameswaran, S.: Skew–symmetric determinants. Am. Math. Mon. 61, 116 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Robertson, N., Seymour, P.D., Thomas, R.: Permanents, Pfaffian orientations, and even directed circuits. Ann. Math. 150, 929–975 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Savani, R., von Stengel, B.: Hard-to-solve bimatrix games. Econometrica 74, 397–429 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Shapley, L.S.: A note on the Lemke–Howson algorithm. In: Mathematical Programming Study 1: Pivoting and Extensions, pp. 175–189 (1974)

  30. Tarjan, R.E.: Efficiency of a good but not linear set union algorithm. J. ACM 22, 215–225 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas, R.: A survey of Pfaffian orientations of graphs. In: Proceedings of International Congress of Mathematicians, Madrid, Spain, Vol. III, pp. 963–984. European Mathematical Society, Zürich (2006)

  32. Todd, M.J.: Abstract Complementary Pivot Theory. PhD Dissertation, Yale University (1972)

  33. Todd, M.J.: A generalized complementary pivot algorithm. Math. Program. 6, 243–263 (1974)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Todd, M.J.: Orientation in complementary pivot algorithms. Math. Oper. Res. 1, 54–66 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Valiant, L.G.: The complexity of computing the permanent. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 8, 189–201 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Vazirani, V.V., Yannakakis, M.: Pfaffian orientations, 0–1 permanents, and even cycles in directed graphs. Discret. Appl. Math. 25, 179–190 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Végh, L.A., von Stengel, B.: Oriented Euler complexes and signed perfect matchings. arXiv:1210.4694 (2012)

  38. von Stengel, B.: New maximal numbers of equilibria in bimatrix games. Discret. Comput. Geom. 21, 557–568 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. von Stengel, B.: Computing equilibria for two-person games. In: Aumann, R.J., Hart, S. (eds.) Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 3, pp. 1723–1759. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ziegler, G.M.: Lectures on Polytopes. Springer, New York (1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Marta Maria Casetti and Julian Merschen for stimulating discussions during our joint research on labeled Gale strings and perfect matchings, which led to the questions answered in this paper. We also thank three anonymous referees for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, London School of Economics, London , WC2A 2AE, UK

    László A. Végh

  2. Department of Mathematics, London School of Economics, London , WC2A 2AE, UK

    Bernhard von Stengel

Authors
  1. László A. Végh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernhard von Stengel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard von Stengel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Végh, L.A., von Stengel, B. Oriented Euler complexes and signed perfect matchings. Math. Program. 150, 153–178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-014-0770-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-014-0770-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Search

Navigation