Skip to main content
Log in

On attraction of linearly constrained Lagrangian methods and of stabilized and quasi-Newton SQP methods to critical multipliers

  • Full Length Paper
  • Series A
  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been previously demonstrated that in the case when a Lagrange multiplier associated to a given solution is not unique, Newton iterations [e.g., those of sequential quadratic programming (SQP)] have a tendency to converge to special multipliers, called critical multipliers (when such critical multipliers exist). This fact is of importance because critical multipliers violate the second-order sufficient optimality conditions, and this was shown to be the reason for slow convergence typically observed for problems with degenerate constraints (convergence to noncritical multipliers results in superlinear rate despite degeneracy). Some theoretical and numerical validation of this phenomenon can be found in Izmailov and Solodov (Comput Optim Appl 42:231–264, 2009; Math Program 117:271–304, 2009). However, previous studies concerned the basic forms of Newton iterations. The question remained whether the attraction phenomenon still persists for relevant modifications, as well as in professional implementations. In this paper, we answer this question in the affirmative by presenting numerical results for the well known MINOS and SNOPT software packages applied to a collection of degenerate problems. We also extend previous theoretical considerations to the linearly constrained Lagrangian methods and to the quasi-Newton SQP, on which MINOS and SNOPT are based. Experiments also show that in the stabilized version of SQP the attraction phenomenon still exists but appears less persistent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonnans J.F., Gilbert J.Ch., Lemaréchal C., Sagastizábal C.: Numerical Optimization: Theoretical and Practical Aspects, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernández, D., Solodov, M.: Stabilized sequential quadratic programming for optimization and a stabilized Newton-type method for variational problems. Math. Program. doi:10.1007/s10107-008-0255-4

  3. Fischer A.: Modified Wilson’s method for nonlinear programs with nonunique multipliers. Math. Oper. Res. 24, 699–727 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fischer A.: Local behavior of an iterative framework for generalized equations with nonisolated solutions. Math. Program. 94, 91–124 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedlander M.P., Saunders M.A.: A globally convergent linearly constrained Lagrangian method for nonlinear optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 15, 863–897 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill P.E., Murray W., Saunders M.A.: SNOPT: an SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 979–1006 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Golubitsky M., Schaeffer D.G.: Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, vol. 1. Springer, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hager W.W.: Stabilized sequential quadratic programming. Comput. Optim. Appl. 12, 253–273 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Izmailov A.F., Solodov M.V.: Karush-Kuhn-Tucker systems: regularity conditions, error bounds and a class of Newton-type methods. Math. Program. 95, 631–650 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Izmailov A.F., Solodov M.V.: Examples of dual behaviour of Newton-type methods on optimization problems with degenerate constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. 42, 231–264 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Izmailov A.F., Solodov M.V.: On attraction of Newton-type iterates to multipliers violating second-order sufficiency conditions. Math. Program. 117, 271–304 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Izmailov, A.F., Tretyakov, A.A.: 2-Regular Solutions of Nonlinear Problems. Theory and Numerical Methods. Fizmatlit, Moscow (1999) (in Russian)

  13. Murtagh B.A., Saunders M.A.: A projected Lagrangian algorithm and its implementation for sparse nonlinear constraints. Math. Program. Study 16, 84–117 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Murtagh, B.A., Saunders, M.A.: MINOS 5.0 user’s guide. Technical Report SOL 83.20, Stanford University, December (1983)

  15. Nocedal J., Wright S.J.: Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pang J.-S.: Error bounds in mathematical programming. Math. Program. 79, 299–332 (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson S.M.: A quadratically convergent algorithm for general nonlinear programming problems. Math. Program. 3, 145–156 (1972)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright S.J.: Modifying SQP for degenerate problems. SIAM J. Optim. 13, 470–497 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright S.J.: Superlinear convergence of a stabilized SQP method to a degenerate solution. Comput. Optim. Appl. 11, 253–275 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. http://www.ampl.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Solodov.

Additional information

The research of A. F. Izmailov is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grants 07-01-00270, 07-01-00416 and 09-01-90001-Bel, and by RF President’s Grant NS-693.2008.1 for the support of leading scientific schools. M. V. Solodov is supported in part by CNPq Grants 301508/2005-4 and 471267/2007-4, by PRONEX–Optimization, and by FAPERJ.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Izmailov, A.F., Solodov, M.V. On attraction of linearly constrained Lagrangian methods and of stabilized and quasi-Newton SQP methods to critical multipliers. Math. Program. 126, 231–257 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-009-0279-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-009-0279-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation