Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Normal Piglet Bladder Damage after PDT with Oral or Intravesical Administration of ALA

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

.

5-Aminolaevulinic-acid (ALA) can be used as an alternative drug in photodynamic therapy of the bladder, since the selective formation of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in the tumour and the virtual absence of induced skin photosensitivity are theoretically advantageous for clinical use. A preclinical study was performed, using an in vivo normal piglet bladder model, in order to determine the maximum drug and light doses for reversible tissue damage. Various ALA doses were administered either orally or instilled in the bladder and different radiant exposures were applied. Bladder biopsies were taken at regular intervals and tissue damage was investigated histologically. After oral ALA-administration the PpIX concentration was determined in plasma, erythrocytes and various tissues. In the case of oral administration, reversible bladder damage was observed using 60–75 mg/kg ALA combined with a radiant exposure of 100 J/cm2 (direct radiant exposure plus scattered 632 nm light) 5–7 h later. For an oral ALA dose of up to 150 mg/kg, the maximum PpIX concentration is reached at ≈5 h following administration and in neither skin nor bladder tissue is PpIX present at 10–11 h after administration. This ALA dose combined with a radiant exposure of 200 J/cm2 produces irreversible bladder damage (extensive necrosis and ulceration). In the case of intravesical instillation for 4–4.75 h, an ALA dose of 2.5 g in 50 ml phosphate buffered saline and a radiant exposure of 100 J/cm2 are still too high to obtain reversible tissue damage; at this dose one of the 13 pigs developed a shrunken bladder with a fibrotic, thickened bladder wall. These drug and light combinations reported above should be regarded as upper limits in pigs and can serve as an indication for the toxicity of the treatment in a clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paper received 11 February 2002; accepted after revision 12 June 2002.

Correspondence to: Johan F. Beek, MD, PhD, Laser Centre, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-20-5664198; Fax: +31-20-6975594; e-mail: j.f.beek@amc.uva.nl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Staveren, H., Beek, J., Verlaan, C. et al. Comparison of Normal Piglet Bladder Damage after PDT with Oral or Intravesical Administration of ALA. Lasers Med Sci 17, 238–245 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s101030200035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s101030200035

Navigation