Abstract
Hemorrhoidal disease is a common and troublesome condition. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy can assure the best chance of cure but it is hampered by postoperative pain and potential long-term morbidity therefore minimally invasive techniques have been developed. Since 2009 a doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization with laser (the hemorrhoidal laser procedure; HeLP) has been proposed to control symptoms without significant sequelae. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the benefits and disadvantages of HeLP for symptomatic hemorrhoids. The Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched from January 2010 to March 2022, language was restricted to English and documents to the full text. Randomized and non-randomized, prospective and retrospective cohort studies were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk of bias for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) and the RoB2 Tool for randomized clinical trial. Primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of HeLP on symptoms’ resolution. Secondary objectives were postoperative pain and complications, comparison with other interventional techniques, and evaluation of long-term recurrence. Whenever possible, a meta-analysis was conducted. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the certainty of evidence. We included six non-randomized and one randomized study. HeLP improved or resolved preoperative symptoms in 83.6 to 100% of patients during follow-up. In the randomized study symptoms resolved in 90% of patients after HeLP and 53.3% after rubber band ligation as comparator. Published data indicate that HeLP is effective, relatively safe, with limited recurrence rate, after a short to medium follow-up. The quality of evidence was however low. There is a paucity of studies assessing the benefits or harms of laser dearterialization for the treatment of hemorrhoids and randomized trials are furthermore rare, therefore trials with adequate power and proper design, assessing the advantages and disadvantages of HeLP versus other minimally invasive techniques, are needed. Furthermore, studies evaluating long-term follow-up are wanted.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data available on request from the authors.
References
Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W (2013) Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 118:934–944
Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T (1995) A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90:610–613
Salfi R (2009) A new technique for ambulatory hemorrhoidal treatment. Coloproctology 31:99–103
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) BMJ 339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng H-Y, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Montori V, Akl EA, Djulbegovic B, Falck-Ytter Y, Norris SL, Williams JW Jr, Atkins D, Meerpohl J, Schünemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence–study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 64:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017
Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, and Rothstein H (2013) Biostat Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3, Englewood, NJ
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Giamundo P, Braini A, Calabro’ G, Crea N, De Nardi P, Fabiano F, Lippa M, Mastromarino A, Tamburini AM (2018) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization with laser (HeLP): a prospective analysis of data from a multicenter trial. Tech Coloproctol 22:635–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1839-5
Giamundo P, Cecchetti W, Esercizio L et al (2011) Doppler guided hemorrhoidal laser procedure for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids: experimental background and short-term clinical results of a new mini-invasive treatment. Surg Endosc 25:1369–1375
Giamundo P, Salfi R, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Murru L, Valente M (2011) The hemorrhoid laser procedure technique vs rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatments for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 54:693–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182112d58
Crea N, Pata G, Lippa M, Chiesa D, Gregorini ME, Gandolfi P (2014) Hemorrhoidal laser procedure: short- and long-term results from a prospective study. Am J Surg 208:21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.020
De Nardi P, Tamburini AM, Gazzetta PG, Lemma M, Pascariello A, Asteria CR (2016) Hemorrhoid laser procedure for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids: results from a multicenter prospective study. Tech Coloproctol 20:455–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1479-6
Boarini P, Boarini LR, Boarini MR, Lima EM, Candelaria PA (2017) Hemorrhoidal laser procedure (HeLP): a painless treatment for hemorrhoids. J Inflam Bowel Dis Disor 2:1000118. https://doi.org/10.4172/2476-1958.1000118
Ram E, Bachar GN, Goldes Y, Joubran S, Rath-Wolfson L (2018) Modified Doppler-guided laser procedure for the treatment of second- and third-degree hemorrhoids. Laser Therapy 27:137–142
Giamundo P, Braini A, Calabrò G, Crea N, De Nardi P, Fabiano F, Lippa M, Mastromarino A, Tamburini AM (2021) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization with laser (HeLP): indications and clinical outcome in the long-term. Results of a multicenter trial. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08248-2. Online ahead of print
Goligher JC (1980) Hemorroid or piles. In: Goligher JC (ed) Surgery of the Anus Rectum and Colon. 4th Edition, Bailliere Tindall, London
Lumb KJ, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner R, Jayaraman S (2006) Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005393. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005393.pub2
Ng KS, Holzgang M, Young C (2020) Still a case of “no pain, no gain”? an updated and critical review of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management options for hemorrhoids in 2020. Ann Coloproctol 36:133–147. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.05.04
Simillis C, Thoukididou SN, Slesser AA, Rasheed S, Tan E, Tekkis PP (2015) Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 102:1603–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9913
Giamundo P (2016) Advantages and limits of hemorrhoidal dearterialization in the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. World J Gastrointest Surg 27(8):1–4. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v8.i1.1
Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1665–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181af50f4
Longchamp G, Liot E, Meyer J, Toso C, Buchs NC, Ris F (2020) Non-excisional laser therapies for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review of the literature. Lasers Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03142-8. Online ahead of print
van Tol RR, Kimman ML, Melenhorst J, Stassen LPS, Dirksen CD, Breukink SO, Members of the Steering Group European Society of Coloproctology (2019) Core outcome set for haemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study among healthcare professionals. Colorectal Dis 21:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14553
Xu L, Chen H, Lin G, Ge Q, Qi H, He X (2016) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Tech Coloproctol 20:825–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1551-2
Cerato MM, Cerato NL, Passos P, Treigue A, Damin DC (2014) Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids: a critical appraisal of the current options. Arq Bras Cir Dig 27:66–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-67202014000100016
Poskus T, Danys D, Makunaite G, Mainelis A, Mikalauskas S, Poskus E, Jotautas V, Dulskas A, Jasiunas E, Strupas K (2020) Results of the double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing laser hemorrhoidoplasty with sutured mucopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 35:481–490
Fleshman J (2002) Advanced technology in the management of hemorrhoids: stapling, laser, harmonic scalpel, and ligasure. J Gastrointest Surg 6:299–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00083-x
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Mr. Diego Bertini for assistance in the literature search
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Paola De Nardi: conception, design and drafting of the work; Giulia Maggi, Michele Pagnanelli., Iliyan Vlasakov: acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; Davide Corbetta: analysis and interpretation of data, drafting; all the authors revised the work critically for important intellectual content, approved the version to be published, agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
De Nardi, P., Maggi, G., Pagnanelli, M. et al. Hemorrhoid laser dearterialization: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 38, 54 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03703-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03703-z