Skip to main content
Log in

Intense pulsed light treatment for inflammatory skin diseases: a review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although intense pulsed light (IPL) has been commonly used in the field of medical cosmetics in recent years, the exact outcomes of IPL in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases remain unclear. To assess the clinical evidence for the use of IPL in the treatment of various inflammatory skin diseases and propose evidence-based recommendations, we searched for relevant publications in the PubMed and Web of Science databases and provided updated information. The inflammatory skin diseases treated with IPL consisted of acne vulgaris, rosacea, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), atopic dermatitis (AD), Riehl’s melanosis, lupus erythematosus, cutaneous sarcoidosis, pilonidal cysts, and pigmented actinic lichen planus (PALP). The efficacy of IPL treatment for these inflammatory skin diseases was described and evaluated. Forty-two studies were included to provide this assessment. The evidence suggests that IPL can effectively and safely improve acne vulgaris and rosacea (recommendation grade B). For other described inflammatory skin diseases, IPL can be used as a tentative or supplementary treatment (recommendation grade C and D). The main complications include transitory erythema, edema, and pain, with the possibility of hyperpigmentation, blisters, and a burning sensation in some individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ziolkowski N, Kitto SC, Jeong D et al (2019) Psychosocial and quality of life impact of scars in the surgical, traumatic and burn populations: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 9(6):e021289

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 220(4596):524–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li D, Lin SB, Cheng B (2016) Intense pulsed light: from the past to the future. Photomed Laser Surg 34(10):435–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kabashima K, Honda T, Ginhoux F, Egawa G (2019) The immunological anatomy of the skin. Nat Rev Immunol 19(1):19–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sawada Y, Gallo RL (2021) Role of epigenetics in the regulation of immune functions of the skin. J Invest Dermatol 141(5):1157–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen P, He G, Qian J, Zhan Y, Xiao R (2021) Potential role of the skin microbiota in inflammatory skin diseases. J Cosmet Dermatol 20(2):400–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sawada Y, Saito-Sasaki N, Mashima E et al (2021) Daily lifestyle and inflammatory skin diseases. Int J Mol Sci 22(10)

  8. Yao Y, RavnJørgensen AH, Thomsen SF (2020) Biologics for chronic inflammatory skin diseases: an update for the clinician. J Dermatolog Treat 31(2):108–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Erceg A, de Jong EM, van de Kerkhof PC et al (2013) The efficacy of pulsed dye laser treatment for inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol 69(4):609-615.e8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi YS, Suh HS, Yoon MY, Min SU, Lee DH, Suh DH (2010) Intense pulsed light vs. pulsed-dye laser in the treatment of facial acne: a randomized split-face trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24(7):773–80

  11. Mohamed EE, Tawfik K, Elsaie M (2016) Intense pulsed light versus 1,064 long-pulsed neodymium: yttrium-aluminum- garnet laser in the treatment of facial acne vulgaris. J Clin Diagn Res 10(7):WC01–3

  12. Moftah NH, Ibrahim SM, Wahba NH (2016) Intense pulsed light versus photodynamic therapy using liposomal methylene blue gel for the treatment of truncal acne vulgaris: a comparative randomized split body study. Arch Dermatol Res 308(4):263–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ianosi S, Neagoe D, Calbureanu M et al (2013) Investigator-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized comparative study on combined vacuum and intense pulsed light versus intense pulsed light devices in both comedonal and papulopustular acne. J Cosmet Laser Ther 15(5):248–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeung CK, Shek SY, Bjerring P et al (2007) A comparative study of intense pulsed light alone and its combination with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of facial acne in Asian skin. Lasers Surg Med 39(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Monib K, Hussein MS (2020) Nd:YAG laser vs IPL in inflammatory and noninflammatory acne lesion treatment. J Cosmet Dermatol 19(9):2325–2332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patidar MV, Deshmukh AR, Khedkar MY (2016) Efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy in the treatment of facial acne vulgaris: comparison of two different fluences. Indian J Dermatol 61(5):545–549

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumaresan M, Srinivas CR (2010) Efficacy of ipl in treatment of acne vulgaris : comparison of single- and burst-pulse mode in IPL. Indian J Dermatol 55(4):370–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J, Liu L, Zhou L et al (2021) The effect of intense pulsed light on the skin microbiota and epidermal barrier in patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Lasers Surg Med 53(10):1348–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Al Abdullah MJ, Mahdi YG (2022) Intense pulsed light versus benzoyl peroxide. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol 28(2):e54–e61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. In Ryu S, Suh DH, Lee SJ et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light using a dual-band filter for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris. Lasers Med Sci 37(1):531–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. El-Latif AA, Hassan FA, Elshahed AR et al (2014) Intense pulsed light versus benzoyl peroxide 5% gel in treatment of acne vulgaris. Lasers Med Sci 29(3):1009–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rojanamatin J, Choawawanich P (2006) Treatment of inflammatory facial acne vulgaris with intense pulsed light and short contact of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 32(8):991–6; discussion 996–7

  23. Chen S, Wang Y, Ren J et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris with a novel filter. J Cosmet Laser Ther 21(6):323–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor M, Porter R, Gonzalez M (2014) Intense pulsed light may improve inflammatory acne through TNF-α down-regulation. J Cosmet Laser Ther 16(2):96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee GS (2012) Inflammatory acne in the Asian skin type III treated with a square pulse, time resolved spectral distribution IPL system: a preliminary study. Laser Ther 21(2):105–111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kawana S, Tachihara R, Kato T et al (2010) Effect of smooth pulsed light at 400 to 700 and 870 to 1,200 nm for acne vulgaris in Asian skin. Dermatol Surg 36(1):52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Deshpande AJ (2018) Efficacy and safety evaluation of high-density intense pulsed light in the treatment of grades II and IV acne vulgaris as monotherapy in dark-skinned women of child bearing age. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 11(4):43–48

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Luo Y, Luan XL, Zhang JH, Wu LX, Zhou N (2020) Improved telangiectasia and reduced recurrence rate of rosacea after treatment with 540 nm-wavelength intense pulsed light: a prospective randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. Exp Ther Med 19(6):3543–3550

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu J, Liu J, Ren Y, Li B, Lu S (2014) Comparative efficacy of intense pulsed light for different erythema associated with rosacea. J Cosmet Laser Ther 16(6):324–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chang HC, Chang YS (2022) Pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for facial erythema of rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dermatolog Treat 33(4):2394–2396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsunoda K, Akasaka K, Akasaka T et al (2018) Successful treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea with intense pulsed light: report of 13 cases. J Dermatol 45(9):1113–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kassir R, Kolluru A, Kassir M (2011) Intense pulsed light for the treatment of rosacea and telangiectasias. J Cosmet Laser Ther 13(5):216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lane JE, Khachemoune A (2010) Use of intense pulsed light to treat refractory granulomatous rosacea. Dermatol Surg 36(4):571–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Papageorgiou P, Clayton W, Norwood S et al (2008) Treatment of rosacea with intense pulsed light: significant improvement and long-lasting results. Br J Dermatol 159(3):628–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schroeter CA, Haaf-von Below S, Neumann HA (2005) Effective treatment of rosacea using intense pulsed light systems. Dermatol Surg 31(10):1285–1289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mark KA, Sparacio RM, Voigt A et al (2003) Objective and quantitative improvement of rosacea-associated erythema after intense pulsed light treatment. Dermatol Surg 29(6):600–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tawfik AA (2014) Novel treatment of nail psoriasis using the intense pulsed light: a one-year follow-up study. Dermatol Surg 40(7):763–768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Highton L, Chan WY, Khwaja N et al (2011) Treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with intense pulsed light: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(2):459–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Theut Riis P, Saunte DM, Sigsgaard V et al (2018) Intense pulsed light treatment for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: beware treatment with resorcinol. J Dermatolog Treat 29(4):385–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Piccolo D, Di Marcantonio D, Crisman G et al (2014) Unconventional use of intense pulsed light. Biomed Res Int 2014:618206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Oh SH, Bae BK, Kim TG et al (2010) Effective treatment of facial redness caused by atopic dermatitis using intense pulsed light systems. Dermatol Surg 36(4):475–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Li YH, Liu J, Chen JZ et al (2011) A pilot study of intense pulsed light in the treatment of Riehl’s melanosis. Dermatol Surg 37(1):119–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Oiso N, Tsuruta D, Imanishi H, et al. (2010) Therapeutic hotline. The effectiveness of intense pulsed light for possible Riehl’s melanosis. Dermatol Ther 23(5):561–3

  44. Ekbäck MP, Troilius A (2013) Laser therapy for refractory discoid lupus erythematosus when everything else has failed. J Cosmet Laser Ther 15(5):260–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Levy JL (2000) Intense pulsed light treatment for chronic facial erythema of systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report. J Cutan Laser Ther 2(4):195–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Byun YS, Son JH, Cho YS et al (2017) Intense pulsed light and Q-switched 1,064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser treatment for the scarring lesion of discoid lupus erythematosus. Ann Dermatol 29(3):331–333

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rosende L, del Pozo J, de Andrés A et al (2012) Intense pulsed light therapy for lupus pernio. Actas Dermosifiliogr 103(1):71–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Shafigh Y, Beheshti A, Charkhchian M et al (2014) Successful treatment of pilonidal disease by intense pulsed light device. Adv Clin Exp Med 23(2):277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Santos-Juanes J, Mas-Vidal A, Coto-Segura P et al (2010) Pigmented actinic lichen planus successfully treated with intense pulsed light. Br J Dermatol 163(3):662–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lu L, Shi M, Chen Z (2020) Efficacy of IPL therapy for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a meta-analysis. J Cosmet Dermatol 19(10):2596–2605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Hangzhou health science and technology key project (No 20220054). This work was supported by Hangzhou medical key discipline construction project (No [2021]21-3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenzhong Xiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

None.

Consent to participate

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, Y., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y. et al. Intense pulsed light treatment for inflammatory skin diseases: a review. Lasers Med Sci 37, 3085–3105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03620-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03620-1

Keywords

Navigation