Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of photobiomodulation using LED on the repair process of skin graft donor sites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The benefits of photobiomodulation (PBM) applied to wounds are well-described in the literature; however, its effects in skin graft donor sites have been poorly studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of LED PBM on re-epithelialization and wound quality of the skin donor site and on pain during repair process. This is a case series study that part of the patients received standard treatment and the others received standard treatment combined with PBM. Data collection was performed at the Burn Unit at a Public Hospital, Brazil. The study had 21 participants and 25 donor sites, 13 in the control group (conventional treatment with Membracel® bandage) and 12 in the experimental group (Membracel® + LED). Irradiation parameters were 1.53 J/cm2, 2.55 mW/cm2, 660 nm, 600 s in the immediate postoperative period as well as on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th days postoperatively. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale. The Bates-Jensen scale was used to monitor the re-epithelialization process and measurements were performed of donor skin sites in the postoperative period. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range [p25; p75]. The comparison of the distribution of these variables between groups was performed using the Mann–Whitney test. No differences between groups were found for re-epithelialization time, area or quality of the wound. Regarding pain, a significant reduction was found on the 5th postoperative day in the experimental group compared to the control group. PBM did not induce changes in the re-epithelialization period, wound area or wound quality scores of the Bates-Jensen Scale but did induce a reduction in pain compared to the group treated with Membracel® alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Mesquita-Ferrari, RA*], upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Ribeiro RVE, Martuscelli OJD (2018) Split- Thickness skin graft donor site dressings: is it possible establish the ideal dressing based on a literature review? Rev Bras Cir Plást 33(1):119–129

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta S, Goil P, Thakurani S (2020) Autologous platelet rich plasma as a preparative for resurfacing burn wounds with split thickness skin grafts. World J Plast Surg 9(1):29–32

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kazanavicius M, Cepas A, Kolaityte V (2017) The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 26(6):281–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Millan LS, Silva DB, Coltro PS, de Almeida PCC, Mattar CA, Faiwichow L (2015) Wound management of partial thickness skin-graft donor area with a collagen and alginate dressing (Fibracol ): findings in 35 patients. Rev Bras Cir Plást 30(2):273–276

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hu A, Guo D, Liu P, Cao X, Li S, Zhu J et al (2017) Randomized clinical trial of autologous skin cell suspension for accelerating re-epithelialization of split-thickness donor sit. BJS 104:836–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes JH, Molnar JA, Shupp JW, Hickerson WL, King BT, Foster KN et al (2019) Demonstration of the safety and effectiveness of the RECELL® System combined with split-thickness meshed autografts for the reduction of donor skin to treat mixed-depth burn injuries. Burns 45:772–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Momeni M, Fallah N, Bajouri A et al (2019) A randomized, double-blind, phase I clinical trial of fetal cell-based skin substitutes on healing of donor sites in burn patients. Burns 45:914–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oualla-Bachiri W, Fernández-González A, Quiñones-Vico MI, Arias-Santiago S (2020) From grafts to human bioengineered vascularized skin substitutes. Int J Mol Sci 21(21):81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi C, Wang C, Liu He (2020) Selection of appropriate wound dressing for various wounds. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 19(8):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tsai S-R, Hamblin MR (2017) Biological effects and medical applications of infrared radiation. J Photochem Photobiol B 170:197–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de Freitas LF, Hamblin MR (2016) Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 22(3):7000417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de Catão MHCV, Nonaka CFW, Ade Albuquerque Júnior RLC, Bento PM, Costa RO (2015) Effects of red laser, infrared, photodynamic therapy, and green LED on the healing process of third-degree burns: clinical and histological study in rats. Lasers Med Sci 30:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiarotto LB, Neves LMG, Esquisatto MAM, do Amaral MEC, Santos GMTD, Mendonça FAS et al (2014) Effects of laser irradiation (670-nm InGaP and 830-nm GaAlAs) on burn of second-degree in rats. Lasers Med Sci 29:1685–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Silveira PC, Ferreira KB, da Rocha FR, Pieri BL, Pedroso GS, De Souza CT, Nesi RT, Pinho RA (2016) Effect of low-power laser (LPL) and light-emitting diode (LED) on inflammatory response in burn wound healing. Inflammation. 39(4):1395–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaghardoost R, Momeni M, Kazemikhoo N, Mokmeli S, Dahmardehei M, Fereshteh Ansari et al (2018) Effect of low -level laser therapy on the healing process of donor site in patients with grade 3 burn ulcer after skin graft surgery (a randomized clinical trial). Lasers Med Sci 33:603–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Voronkov MG, Motorina IG, Iushkov GG, Benemanski VV, Rasulov MM, Snisarenko KA (2014) Effect of laser radiation of infrared and red range on healing of burn wounds. Dokl Biochem Biophys 456:85–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira RA, Boson LLB, Portela SMM, Maia Filho ALM, Santiago DO (2018) Low-intensity LED therapy (658 nm) on burn healing: a series of cases. Lasers Med Sci 33(4):729–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Güldoğan CE, Kendirci M, Tikici D, Gündoğdu E, Yastı AC (2017) Clinical infection in burn patients and its consequences. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 23(6):466–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghezeljeh TN, Ardebili FM, Rafii F (2017) The effects of massage and music on pain, anxiety and relaxation in burn patients: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Burns 43(5):1034–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. O´Brien KH, Lushin V (2019) Examining the impact of psychological factors on hospital length of stay for burn survivors: a systematic review. J Burn Care Res 40(1):12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bates-Jensen BM, McCreath HE, Harputlu D, Patlan A (2019) Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: the pressure ulcer detection study. Wound Rep Reg 27(4):386–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gopi Chander N (2019) Visual analog scale in prosthodontics. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 19(2):99–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bailey S, Carmean M, Cinat M, Burton K, Lane C, Malinoski D (2011) A randomized comparison study of Aquacel Ag and Glucan II as donor site dressings with regard to healing time, cosmesis, infection rate, and patient’s perceived pain: a pilot study. J Burn Care Res 32(6):627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Silva SB, Salani R, Ferreira RC (2021) Pass through primary coatings used to treat cutaneous wounds? Adv Skin Wound Care 34(2):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guimarães LSP, Hirakata VN (2012) Use of the generalized estimating equation model in longitudinal data analysis. Revista HCPA 32(4):503–511

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ 340

  27. Mishra P, Singh U, Pandey CM, Mishra P, Pandey G (2019) Application of student’s t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance. Ann Card Anaesth 22(4):407–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fang Z, Yang X, Wu G, Liu M, Han J, Tao K et al (2019) The use of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel increases wound healing and reduces scar development in split-thickness skin graft donor sites. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 53(6):356–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang P-H, Huang B-S, Horng H-C, Yeh C-C, Chen Y-J (2018) Wound healing. J Chin Med Assoc 81(2):94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gonzalez ACO, Costa TF, Andrade ZA, Medrado ARAP (2016) Wound healing—a literature review*. An Bras Dermatol 91(5):614–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuffler DP (2016) Photobiomodulation in promoting wound healing: a review. Regen Med 11(1):107–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brolmann FE, Eskes AM, Goslings JC, Niessen FB, de Bree R, Vahl AC et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting. Br J Surg 100:619–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mosca RC, Ong AA, Albasha O, Bass K, Arany P (2019) Photobiomodulation therapy for wound care. Adv Skin Wound Care 32(4):157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dornseifer Ulf, Lonic D, Gerstung TI, Herter F et al (2011) The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing. A clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and aquacel. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(4):918–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramos FS, da Costa Aguiar Alves B, Perez MM, Feder D, Fonseca FLA, Maifrino LBM, Alves S, Azzalis LA, Junqueira VBC (2018) The effects of transcutaneous low-level laser therapy on the skin healing process: an experimental model. Lasers Med Sci 33(5):967–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by UNINOVE and the Brazilian fostering agencies: Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES; Contract grant number: 88882.365372/2019–01); The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (306718/2018–9).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carboni, R.M., Gonçalves, M.L.L., Tacla, E.M. et al. The effects of photobiomodulation using LED on the repair process of skin graft donor sites. Lasers Med Sci 37, 1881–1890 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03447-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03447-2

Keywords

Navigation