Abstract
Laser therapy has proved effective in the treatment of different tissue injuries but little is known about its effect on the testis. The aim of this review was to synthesize research on the in vivo effect of low-level laser therapy on the seminiferous epithelium. A search was performed in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS databases. The initial search retrieved 354 references, and five articles that met the eligibility criteria were selected. In general, the studies showed that laser therapy exerted a positive effect on the germ cell population; however, there was considerable variation in the laser parameters, as well as in the experimental models and methods of tissue analysis used. In conclusion, further studies determining the biostimulation parameters of laser therapy in the testis are necessary in order to provide a basis for the possible application of this technique to the restoration of the human seminiferous epithelium and consequent treatment of some male reproductive disorders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pathak UI, Gabrielsen JS, Lipshultz LI (2020) Cutting-edge evaluation of male infertility. Urol Clin North Am 47:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2019.12.001
Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR (2015) A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1
Baker HW (1998) Reproductive effects of nontesticular illness. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 27:831–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70043-8
Ramlau-Hansen CH, Thulstrup AM, Aggerholm AS, Jensen MS, Toft G, Bonde JP (2007) Is smoking a risk factor for decreased semen quality? A cross-sectional analysis. Hum Reprod 22:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del364
Ferlin A (2012) New genetic markers for male fertility. Asian J Androl 14:807–808. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2012.84
O'Flynn O'Brien KL, Varghese AC, Agarwal A (2010) The genetic causes of male factor infertility: a review. Fertil Steril 93:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.045
Bracke A, Peeters K, Punjabi U, Hoogewijs D, Dewilde S (2018) A search for molecular mechanisms underlying male idiopathic infertility. Reprod BioMed Online 36:327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.12.005
Hjollund NH, Bonde JP, Jensen TK, Olsen J (2000) Diurnal scrotal skin temperature and semen quality. The Danish first pregnancy planner study team. Int J Androl 23:309–318. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2605.2000.00245.x
Wang C, McDonald V, Leung A, Superlano L, Berman N, Hull L, Swerdloff RS (1997) Effect of increased scrotal temperature on sperm production in normal men. Fertil Steril 68:334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81525-7
Henderson J, Baker HW, Hanna PJ (1986) Occupation-related male infertility: a review. Clin Reprod Fertil 4:87–106
Sheiner EK, Sheiner E, Hammel RD, Potashnik G, Carel R (2003) Effect of occupational exposures on male fertility: literature review. Ind Health 41:55–62. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.41.55
Jung A, Strauss P, Lindner HJ, Schuppe HC (2008) Influence of moderate cycling on scrotal temperature. Int J Androl 31:403–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2007.00783.x
Durairajanayagam D, Agarwal A, Ong C (2015) Causes, effects and molecular mechanisms of testicular heat stress. Reprod BioMed Online 30:14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.018
Ebokaiwe AP, Ijomone OM, Osawe SO, Chukwu CJ, Ejike CECC, Zhang G, Wang F (2018) Alteration in sperm characteristics, endocrine balance and redox status in rats rendered diabetic by streptozotocin treatment: attenuating role of Loranthus micranthus. Redox Rep 23:194–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510002.2018.1540675
Khaneshi F, Nasrolahi O, Azizi S, Nejati V (2013) Sesame effects on testicular damage in streptozotocin-induced diabetes rats. Avicenna J Phytomed 3:347–355
de Freitas LF, Hamblin MR (2016) Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 22:7000417. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2561201
Li WT, Chen HL, Wang CT (2006) Effect of light emitting diode irradiation on proliferation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Med Biol Eng 26:35–42
Moore P, Ridgway TD, Higbee RG, Howard EW, Lucroy MD (2005) Effect of wavelength on low-intensity laser irradiation stimulated cell proliferation in vitro. Lasers Surg Med 36:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20117
Wu S, Zhou F, Wei Y, Chen WR, Chen Q, Xing D (2014) Cancer phototherapy via selective photoinactivation of respiratory chain oxidase to trigger a fatal superoxide anion burst. Antioxid Redox Signal 20:733–746. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5229
Gao X, Xing D (2009) Molecular mechanisms of cell proliferation induced by low power laser irradiation. J Biomed Sci 16:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-16-4
Gadella BM, Luna C (2014) Cell biology and functional dynamics of the mammalian sperm surface. Theriogenology 81:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.005
Cohen N, Lubart R, Rubinstein S, Breitbart H (1998) Light irradiation of mouse spermatozoa: stimulation of in vitro fertilization and calcium signals. Photochem Photobiol 68:407–413
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Higgins JPTG, Higgins S (2011) Cochrane handbook of systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane collaboration Available: www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 2020 Feb 25
Bermúdez D, Carrasco F, Diaz F, Perez-de-Vargas I (1991) Germ cell DNA quantification shortly after IR laser radiation. Andrologia 23:303–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1991.tb02566.x
Bermúdez D, Carrasco F, Pérez de Vargas I (1993) Effect of IR laser radiation on germ cell DNA content after one cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Arch Androl 31:177–181. https://doi.org/10.3109/01485019308988397
Taha MF, Valojerdi MR (2004) Quantitative and qualitative changes of the seminiferous epithelium induced by Ga. Al. As. (830 nm) laser radiation. Lasers Surg Med 34:352–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20027
Alves MB, de Arruda RP, Batissaco L, Florez-Rodriguez SA, de Oliveira BM, Torres MA, Ravagnani GM, Lançoni R, de Almeida TG, Storillo VM, Vellone VS, Franci CR, Thomé HE, Canella CL, De Andrade AF, Celeghini EC (2016) Low-level laser therapy to recovery testicular degeneration in rams: effects on seminal characteristics, scrotal temperature, plasma testosterone concentration, and testes histopathology. Lasers Med Sci 31:695–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1911-1
Dadras S, Abdollahifar MA, Nazarian H, Ghoreishi SK, Fallahnezhad S, Naserzadeh P, Jajarmi V, Chien S, Bayat M (2018) Photobiomodulation improved stereological parameters and sperm analysis factors in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Photochem Photobiol B 186:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.06.018
Vladimirovich Moskvin S, Ivanovich Apolikhin O (2018) Effectiveness of low level laser therapy for treating male infertility. Biomedicine (Taipei) 8:7. https://doi.org/10.1051/bmdcn/2018080207
Clermont Y, Harvey SC (1965) Duration of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium of normal, hypophysectomized and hypophysectomized-hormone treated albino rats. Endocrinology 76:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-76-1-80
Funding
The study was financed in part by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Façanha, E.L., de Morais, E.F., Pinheiro, J.C. et al. Effect of low-level laser therapy on seminiferous epithelium: a systematic review of in vivo studies. Lasers Med Sci 36, 259–267 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03122-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03122-y