Effect of quality-switched laser exposure in patients with history of edible gold consumption
Injectable gold is known to deposit in the dermis for life, and such patients are at risk of developing chrysiasis post-laser exposure. It is unknown if patients with history of edible gold consumption would develop a similar reaction after quality-switched laser exposure. Our aim is to assess if patients with history of edible gold consumption develop chrysiasis after quality-switched laser exposure. This is a proof of concept pilot study conducted between September 2017 and September 2018 at two dermatology clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Adult patients who have history of edible gold consumption were recruited to receive a spot test with different quality-switched lasers in a hidden, non-sun-exposed skin site. The test area was photographed before, immediately after, and 10 min after laser exposure. The test area was examined by two independent investigators for the development of chrysiasis. A total of 10 patients (five male and five female) were enrolled. The mean age was 31.7 years. Forty percent of subjects consumed edible gold more than once, and the duration of last intake ranged from 3 weeks to 3 months. Chocolate was the main source of edible gold. All participants had no chrysiasis reaction post-quality-switched laser exposure. Contrary to our hypothesis, all participants with history of short-term edible gold consumption did not develop chrysiasis after quality-switched laser exposure. Further controlled studies including more patients with longer duration and higher frequency of edible gold consumption are needed.
KeywordsEdible Gold Chrysiasis Laser
Compliance with ethical standards
IRB approval status: Reviewed and approved by King Abdullah International Medical Research Center IRB, approval no. RC17-186-R. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Almoallim H, Klinkhoff AV, Arthur AB, Rivers JK, Chalmers A (2006) Laser induced chrysiasis: disfiguring hyperpigmentation following Q-switched laser therapy in a woman previously treated with gold. J Rheumatol 33(3):620–621Google Scholar
- 9.European Commission (2016) Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of gold (E175) as a food additive. Eur Food Safety Authority J 14:4362–4405Google Scholar
- 10.Kean WF, Lock CJ, Kassam YB, Rooney PJ, Rischke J, Nablo L, Buchanan WW (1984) A biological effect on platelets by the minor component of gold sodium thiomalate--a by-product of heat sterilization and exposure to light. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2(4):321–328Google Scholar
- 12.Aaron S, Davis P, Biggs D (1984) D-penicillamine does not chelate gold. J Rheumatol 11(6):869–870Google Scholar
- 13.Guenthner T, Stork CM, Cantor RM (1999) Goldschlager allergy in a gold allergic patient. Vet Hum Toxicol 41(4):246–246Google Scholar
- 18.IMAI K (2018) Concern of carcinogenic risk of eating gold leaf (gold foil)-in relation to asbestos carcinogenesis mechanism. Nanobiomedicine 10(1):26–30Google Scholar
- 21.Cohen PR, Ross EV (2015) Q-switched alexandrite laser-induced chrysiasis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 8(9):48Google Scholar