Skip to main content

Optical coherence tomography imaging of melanoma skin cancer

Abstract

No consensus guidelines exist on the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. The objectives of this review are to provide a descriptive review of the literature on characteristics of cutaneous melanomas seen on high-definition OCT (HD-OCT), speckle variance OCT (SV-OCT), and conventional OCT and to compare their diagnostic ability with that of histopathology. A review of PubMed and Google Scholar identified all available literature on OCT in melanoma skin cancer that included all in vivo and ex vivo studies on human or human tissues and excluded all studies on non-human subjects or animal studies. Two hundred nine abstracts were considered for evaluation, 31 abstracts were selected for manuscript review, and 14 abstracts were included that met all criteria. Diagnoses of MIS and MM using HD-OCT and SV-OCT were consistently reported to correlate with histopathology. However, accuracy of diagnosis using conventional OCT varied. Most authors agreed that it was difficult to differentiate MM from benign nevi using conventional OCT. HD-OCT, SV-OCT, and conventional OCT show promise for visualizing cutaneous melanoma. The use of OCT in diagnosis of melanoma is rarely reported in the literature. There is a need to increase and standardize reporting of OCT for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Guy GP Jr, Thomas CC, Thompson T, Watson M, Massetti GM, Richardson LC (2015) Vital signs: melanoma incidence and mortality trends and projections - United States, 1982-2030. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64:591–596

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Surveillance E, and End Results (SEER) Program (2017) Cancer Stat Facts: Melanoma of the Skin (1975-2015). National Cancer Institute

  3. 3.

    Kent MN, Olsen TG, Feeser TA, Tesno KC, Moad JC, Conroy MP, Kendrick MJ, Stephenson SR, Murchland MR, Khan AU, Peacock EA, Brumfiel A, Bottomley MA (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of virtual pathology vs traditional microscopy in a large dermatopathology study. JAMA Dermatol 153:1285–1291

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nischal U, Nischal KC, Khopkar U (2008) Techniques of skin biopsy and practical considerations. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 1:107–111

  5. 5.

    Sattler E, Kästle R, Welzel J (2013) Optical coherence tomography in dermatology. J Biomed Opt 18:061224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fercher AF, Mengedoht K, Werner W (1988) Eye-length measurement by interferometry with partially coherent light. Opt Lett 13:186–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA et al (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254:1178–1181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Olsen J, Themstrup L, Jemec GB (2015) Optical coherence tomography in dermatology. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 150:603–615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Calin MA, Parasca SV, Savastru R, Calin MR, Dontu S (2013) Optical techniques for the noninvasive diagnosis of skin cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139:1083–1104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Marghoob AA, Swindle LD, Moricz CZ, Sanchez Negron FA, Slue B, Halpern AC, Kopf AW (2003) Instruments and new technologies for the in vivo diagnosis of melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 49:777–797 quiz 798–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gallwas JK, Turk L, Stepp H, Mueller S, Ochsenkuehn R, Friese K, Dannecker C (2011) Optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lasers Surg Med 43:206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kirtane TS, Wagh MS (2014) Endoscopic optical coherence tomography (OCT): advances in gastrointestinal imaging. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014:376367

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    DeCoro M, Wilder-Smith P (2010) Potential of optical coherence tomography for early diagnosis of oral malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 10:321–329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang J, Xu Y, Boppart SA (2017) Review of optical coherence tomography in oncology. J Biomed Opt 22:1–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Boone MA, Suppa M, Dhaenens F, Miyamoto M, Marneffe A, Jemec GB, Del Marmol V, Nebosis R (2016) In vivo assessment of optical properties of melanocytic skin lesions and differentiation of melanoma from non-malignant lesions by high-definition optical coherence tomography. Arch Dermatol Res 308:7–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Boone MA, Norrenberg S, Jemec GB, Del Marmol V (2014) High-definition optical coherence tomography imaging of melanocytic lesions: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol Res 306:11–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    De Carvalho N, Ciardo S, Cesinaro AM, Jemec G, Ulrich M, Welzel J, Holmes J, Pellacani G (2016) In vivo micro-angiography by means of speckle-variance optical coherence tomography (SV-OCT) is able to detect microscopic vascular changes in naevus to melanoma transition. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 30:e67–e68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    de Giorgi V, Stante M, Massi D, Mavilia L, Cappugi P, Carli P (2005) Possible histopathologic correlates of dermoscopic features in pigmented melanocytic lesions identified by means of optical coherence tomography. Exp Dermatol 14:56–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gambichler T, Schmid-Wendtner MH, Plura I, Kampilafkos P, Stücker M, Berking C, Maier T (2015) A multicentre pilot study investigating high-definition optical coherence tomography in the differentiation of cutaneous melanoma and melanocytic naevi. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29:537–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gambichler T, Plura I, Schmid-Wendtner M, Valavanis K, Kulichova D, Stücker M, Pljakic A, Berking C, Maier T (2015) High-definition optical coherence tomography of melanocytic skin lesions. J Biophotonics 8:681–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gambichler T, Regeniter P, Bechara FG, Orlikov A, Vasa R, Moussa G, Stücker M, Altmeyer P, Hoffmann K (2007) Characterization of benign and malignant melanocytic skin lesions using optical coherence tomography in vivo. J Am Acad Dermatol 57:629–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hinz T, Ehler LK, Voth H, Fortmeier I, Hoeller T, Hornung T, Schmid-Wendtner MH (2011) Assessment of tumor thickness in melanocytic skin lesions: comparison of optical coherence tomography, 20-MHz ultrasound and histopathology. Dermatology 223:161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Markowitz O, Schwartz M, Minhas S, Siegel DM (2016) Speckle-variance optical coherence tomography: a novel approach to skin cancer characterization using vascular patterns. Dermatol Online Journal 22

  24. 24.

    Meyer N, Lauwers-Cances V, Lourari S, Laurent J, Konstantinou MP, Lagarde JM, Krief B, Batatia H, Lamant L, Paul C (2014) High-frequency ultrasonography but not 930-nm optical coherence tomography reliably evaluates melanoma thickness in vivo: a prospective validation study. Br J Dermatol 171:799–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Moraes Pinto Blumetti TC, Cohen MP, Gomes EE, Petaccia de Macedo M, Ferreira de Souza Begnami MD, Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani JH, Duprat JP, Pellacani G, Rezze GG (2015) Optical coherence tomography (OCT) features of nevi and melanomas and their association with intraepidermal or dermal involvement: a pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol 73:315–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Oliveira A, Arzberger E, Massone C, Carrera C, Zalaudek I (2016) Verrucous melanoma simulating melanoacanthoma: dermoscopic, reflectance confocal microscopic and high-definition optical coherence tomography presentation of a rare melanoma variant. Australas J Dermatol 57:72–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Welzel J, Lankenau E, Birngruber R, Engelhardt R (1997) Optical coherence tomography of the human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 37:958–963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wessels R, de Bruin DM, Relyveld GN, Faber DJ, Vincent AD, Sanders J, van Leeuwen TG, Ruers TJ (2015) Functional optical coherence tomography of pigmented lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29:738–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Welzel J, Lankenau E, Birngruber R, Engelhardt R (1998) Optical coherence tomography of the skin. Curr Probl Dermatol 26:27–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bataille V (2009) Early detection of melanoma improves survival. Practitioner 253(29–32):3

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Voss RK, Woods TN, Cromwell KD, Nelson KC, Cormier JN (2015) Improving outcomes in patients with melanoma: strategies to ensure an early diagnosis. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 6:229–242

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Menge TD, Pellacani G (2016) Advances in noninvasive imaging of melanoma. Semin Cutan Med Surg 35:18–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mogensen M, Thrane L, Jørgensen TM, Andersen PE, Jemec GB (2009) OCT imaging of skin cancer and other dermatological diseases. J Biophotonics 2:442–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Goodson AG, Grossman D (2009) Strategies for early melanoma detection: approaches to the patient with nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol 60:719–735 quiz 736–738

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Smith L, Macneil S (2011) State of the art in non-invasive imaging of cutaneous melanoma. Skin Res Technol 17:257–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Schuh S, Holmes J, Ulrich M, Themstrup L, Jemec GBE, De Carvalho N, Pellacani G, Welzel J (2017) Imaging blood vessel morphology in skin: dynamic optical coherence tomography as a novel potential diagnostic tool in dermatology. Dermatol Ther 7:187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rigel DS, Russak J, Friedman R (2010) The evolution of melanoma diagnosis: 25 years beyond the ABCDs. CA Cancer J Clin 60:301–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Patel JK, Konda S, Perez OA, Amini S, Elgart G, Berman B (2008) Newer technologies/techniques and tools in the diagnosis of melanoma. Eur J Dermatol 18:617–631

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ulrich M, Themstrup L, de Carvalho N, Manfredi M, Grana C, Ciardo S, Kästle R, Holmes J, Whitehead R, Jemec GB, Pellacani G, Welzel J (2016) Dynamic optical coherence tomography in dermatology. Dermatology 232:298–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabella Camacho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This review is in compliance with ethical standards.

Informed consent

Not applicable to this review article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajabi-Estarabadi, A., Bittar, J.M., Zheng, C. et al. Optical coherence tomography imaging of melanoma skin cancer. Lasers Med Sci 34, 411–420 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2696-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Melanoma
  • Skin cancer
  • Diagnosis