Advertisement

A novel 450-nm blue laser system for surgical applications: efficacy of specific laser-tissue interactions in bladder soft tissue

  • Da-Li Jiang
  • Zheng Yang
  • Guo-Xiong Liu
  • Kaijie Wu
  • Jinhai Fan
  • Dapeng Wu
  • Lei Li
  • Xinyang Wang
  • Peng Guo
  • Liyue Mu
  • Dalin He
Original Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Low-power blue laser allows clean cutting with little bleeding and no undesired coagulations in adjacent tissues; however, studies on high-power blue laser soft tissue ablation properties, including vaporization and coagulation, have not been reported yet. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and analyze the ablation efficacy and coagulation properties of bladder epithelium tissues with a 30-W 450-nm wavelength blue laser. Well-designed ex vivo experiments compared blue laser and 532-nm LBO green laser, both with laser power up to 30 W, for porcine bladder tissue vaporization and coagulation at different experimental parameter settings. At working distance of 1 mm and sweeping speed of 1.5 mm/s, the vaporization efficiency of blue laser and green laser was 5.14mm3/s and 1.20mm3/s, while the depth of coagulation layer was 460 ± 70 μm and 470 ± 80 μm, respectively. We found both blue laser and green laser have excellent efficacy of tissue vaporization and similar tissue coagulation properties. Moreover, in a set of in vivo experiments simulated laser transurethral resection (TUR) surgery on dogs, we found both blue laser and green laser exhibited similar and satisfactory vaporization and coagulation outcomes. Taken together, our results demonstrate that a 450-nm wavelength high-power diode blue laser, like 532-nm wavelength green laser, is capable to produce high efficient tissue vaporization, low-laser tissue penetration, good tissue coagulation, and has low thermal damage to adjacent tissues. Therefore, a 30-W blue diode laser could be a new and safe alternative for surgeries of superficial bladder diseases.

Keywords

Blue laser Bladder Vaporization Coagulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Xiawei Dang, Feng Ma and Fei Xue for technology support and thank Research Institute of Regenerative Medicine and Surgical Engineering of Shaanxi Province (Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi, China) for providing instructions and equipment in the animal in vivo surgeries. This study was supported by the key research and development program of Shaanxi Province, China (S2017-ZDYF-ZDCXL-SF-0047 to DH).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. 1.
    Akasaki I (2015) Blue light: a fascinating journey (Nobel Lecture). Angew Chem Int Ed 54(27):7750–7763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vogel A, Venugopalan V (2003) Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues. Chem Rev 103(2):577–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beard P (2011) Biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Interface Focus 1(4):602–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Naqvi KR (2014) Screening hypochromism (sieve effect) in red blood cells: a quantitative analysis. Biomed Opt Express 5(4):1290–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braun A et al (2018) Efficiency of soft tissue incision with a novel 445-nm semiconductor laser. Lasers Med Sci 33(1):27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reichelt J et al (2017) A novel blue light laser system for surgical applications in dentistry: evaluation of specific laser-tissue interactions in monolayer cultures. Clin Oral Investig 21(4):985–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kang HW, Peng YS, Stinson D (2010) Quantitative evaluation of high power effect on 532 nm laser vaporization of bovine prostate in vitro. J Urol 184(3):1211–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kang HW et al (2008) Laser vaporization of bovine prostate: a quantitative comparison of potassium-titanyl-phosphate and lithium triborate lasers. J Urol 180(6):2675–2680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herrmann TR et al (2012) EAU guidelines on laser technologies. Eur Urol 61(4):783–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lotan Y et al (2002) Clinical use of the holmium: YAG laser in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 16(5):289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaboardi F et al (1994) Conservative treatment of upper urinary tract tumors with Nd:YAG laser. J Endourol 8(1):37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laven BA et al (2001) Long-term results of antegrade endoureterotomy using the holmium laser in patients with ureterointestinal strictures. Urology 58(6):924–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dolowy L et al (2015) The role of lasers in modern urology. Cent European J Urol 68(2):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuntz RM (2006) Current role of lasers in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Eur Urol 49(6):961–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bach T et al (2010) Thulium:YAG laser enucleation (VapoEnucleation) of the prostate: safety and durability during intermediate-term follow-up. World J Urol 28(1):39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teichmann HO, Herrmann TR, Bach T (2007) Technical aspects of lasers in urology. World J Urol 25(3):221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vo-Dinh T (2003) Biomedical photonics handbook. CRC Press 103(2), pp 577–644Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urologythe First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Urologythe Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi UniversityJiamusiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of UrologyXianyang Central HospitalXianyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations