Skip to main content

Er:YAG laser application in caries removal and cavity preparation in children: a meta-analysis

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the applications of Er:YAG lasers for the removal of caries and cavity preparation in children. The meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was conducted with data extracted from seven relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 1997 to July 2017. The data heterogeneity of each study was assessed by a Q test. We used the heterogeneity results to calculate the standard mean difference (SMD) or relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) using STATA version 10.0. The publication bias was evaluated using Begger’s test. There were seven randomized controlled trials included in this study. The analysis results indicate that compared to the conventional mechanical method, more time was needed for Er:YAG laser treatment (SMD 1.945, 95%CI 0.942 to 2.948). However, the pain reported by patients was reduced with Er:YAG laser treatment (SMD − 1.013, 95%CI − 1.892 to − 0.196). There were no significant differences between the groups in the complete retention rate (RR 1.021, 95%CI 0.963 to 1.114), the marginal discoloration (RR 1.638, 95% CI 0.240 to 11.986) and the marginal adaptation (RR 1.480, 95%CI 0.257 to 8.515). In conclusion, our data indicate that the time required for Er:YAG laser treatment was longer than that for the conventional mechanical method, but there was less pain associated with the Er:YAG laser treatment. There were no significant differences in the complete retention rate, marginal discoloration, and marginal adaptation between the two groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Tang GX, Li J, Wu GY, Zhou S (2011) Influence of carisolv caries removal on 155 children’s dental fear. Stomatology 31(9):552–554

    Google Scholar 

  2. Su JM, Ruan WH, Ye XW, Wu ZF, Huang XJ (2007) Children’s temperament characteristics and dental fear. W CN J Sto 25(4):362–364

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hibst R, Keller U (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 9(4):338–344

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Kimura Y, Yamada Y, Ito M, Matsumoto K (2000) Caries-preventive effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation with or without water mist. J Clin Laser Med Surg 18(2):61–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/clm.2000.18.61

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DenBesten PK, White JM, Pelino JEP, Furnish G, Silveira A, Parkins FM (2001) The safety and effectiveness of an Er:YAG laser for caries removal and cavity preparation in children. Med Laser Appl 16(3):215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohari MR, Chunawalla YK, Ahmed BMN (2012) Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 13(1):40–47

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarmadi R, Hedman E, Gabre P (2014) Laser in caries treatment—patients’ experiences and opinions. Int J Dent Hyg 12(1):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12027

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mosskull HP, Bagesund M (2013) Er:YAG laser or high-speed bur for cavity preparation in adolescents. Acat Odontol Scand 71(3–4):610–615. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.700064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nazemisalman B, Farsadeghi M, Sokhansanj M (2015) Types of lasers and their applications in pediatric dentistry. J Lasers Med Sci 6(3):96–101. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2015.01

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Da MA, Leal CR, Olivan S, Leal GM, de Oliveira VA, Pinto MM, Bussadori SK (2016) Case report of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of dental caries on primary teeth. J Lasers Med Sci 7(2):131–133. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2016.22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schein MT, Bocangel JS, Nogueira GE, Schein PA (2003) SEM evaluation of the interaction pattern between dentin and resin after cavity preparation using Er:YAG laser. J Dent 31(2):127–135

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng X, Li S, Ma Z, Zhang Y (2012) Eight of meta analysis series: meta-analysis of report specification. Chin J Evid Based Cardiovasc Med (6):500–503

  13. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22(4):719–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. DerSimonian R, Laird N (2015) Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials 45(Pt A):139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu JF, Lai YL, Shu WY, Lee SY (2006) Acceptance and efficiency of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation in children. Photomed Laser Surg 24(4):489–493. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2006.24.489

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Valerio RA, Borsatto MC, Serra MC, Polizeli SA, Nemezio MA, Galo R, Aires CP, Dos SA, Corona SA (2016) Caries removal in deciduous teeth using an Er:YAG laser: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 20(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1470-z

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhegova GG, Rashkova MR (2015) Er:YAG laser and dental caries treatment of permanent teeth in childhood. J IMAB 21(1):699–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lv X (2015) The application of Er:YAG laser in caries removal and cavity preparation of children. Zh J Trau 04:715–717

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu Y, Wang L, Li N, Wu P (2015) Er:YAG laser versus airtrbin for caries in children. J Pract Diagn Ther 10:1007–1008

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wei Y, Yang K, Han H, Liu Y (2016) The analysis of application effect on different treatment of caries in children. Stomatology 01:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang S, Chen T, Ge LH (2013) Evaluation of clinical outcomes for Er:YAG laser application in caries therapy of children. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 45(1):87–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Glass GV (1976) Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 5:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, Ando Y, Yamamoto H (1998) Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 77(6):1404–1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770060501

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Celiberti P, Francescut P, Lussi A (2006) Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth. Caries Res 40(2):117–123. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091057

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shigetani Y, Okamoto A, Abu-Bakr N, Iwaku M (2002) A study of cavity preparation by Er:YAG laser-observation of hard tooth structures by laser scanning microscope and examination of the time necessary to remove caries. Dent Mater J 21(1):20–31

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Evans DJ, Matthews S, Pitts NB, Longbottom C, Nugent ZJ (2000) A clinical evaluation of an Erbium:YAG laser for dental cavity preparation. Br Dent J 188(12):677–679

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M T (1995) Clinical evaluation of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation. J Conserv Dent 38:1035–1047

  29. Zheng X, Liu X, Hu D, Fu X (2003) Application of Er:YAG laser in precautionary resin filling: SEM study. Chin J Laser Med 12(4):224–228

  30. Ramos AC, Esteves-Oliveira M, Arana-Chavez VE, de Paula EC (2010) Adhesives bonded to erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser irradiated dentin:transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and tensile bond strength analyses. Lasers Med Sci 25(2):181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-008-0600-0

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hossain M, Yamada Y, Nakamura Y, Murakami Y, Tamaki Y, Matsumoto K (2003) A study on surface roughness and microleakage test in cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities. Lasers Med Sci 18(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-002-0235-5

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW (2001) Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er:YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 17(4):340–346

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aranha AC, Turbino ML, Powell GL, Eduardo CP (2005) Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Lasers Surg Med 37(2):172–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20208

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sanhadji EHY, Cetik S, Bahrami B, Atash R (2016) A comparative study of microleakage on dental surfaces bonded with three self-etch adhesive systems treated with the Er:YAG laser and bur. Biomed Res Int 2016:2509757. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2509757

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tuna EB, Ozel E, Kasimoglu Y, Firatli E (2017) Investigation of the Er:YAG laser and diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of class V cavities restored with different flowable composites. Microsc Res Tech 80(5):530–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22827

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Corona SA, Borsatto M, Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pecora JD (2001) Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 26(5):491–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, Bicer CO, Firatli E (2009) Leakage pathway of different nano-r nano-restorative materials in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Photomed Laser Surg 27(5):783–789. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2008.2313

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA (2001) Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 14(3):157–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Shi.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Stomatological Hospital, Hebei Medical University. This was a meta-analysis so an informed consent was not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, T., Zhang, X., Shi, H. et al. Er:YAG laser application in caries removal and cavity preparation in children: a meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 34, 273–280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2582-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2582-x

Keywords

  • Meta-analysis
  • Er:YAG laser
  • Conventional mechanical method
  • Dental caries
  • Children