Comparative microstructural analysis of bone osteotomies after cutting by computer-assisted robot-guided laser osteotome and piezoelectric osteotome: an in vivo animal study
- 86 Downloads
Most industrial laser applications utilize computer and robot assistance, for guidance, safety, repeatability, and precision. In contrast, medical applications using laser systems are mostly conducted manually. The advantages can be effective only when the system is coupled to a robotic guidance, as operating by hand does not reach the required accuracy. We currently developed the first laser osteotome which offers preoperative planning based on CT data, robot guidance, and a precise execution of the laser cuts. In an animal trial, our system was used to create a grid pattern of the same depth on the inner layer of parietal bone in 12 adult sheep. The same bone cuts were done with piezoelectric osteotome on the contralateral side. The micro-CT and histological analysis showed more new mineralized bone in the laser group compared to the piezoelectric group. As well, a cutting pattern with especially a constant osteotomy depth in the laser group was demonstrated. The here presented autonomous osteotomy tool shows not only an advantage in early bone healing stage but additionally sharp bone cuts with a very high accuracy and freely selectable design cuts.
KeywordsLaser osteotomy Er:YAG laser Navigation Bone Nanotome Micro-CT
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Georg Schulz, Biomaterials Science Center, University of Basel, Switzerland, for performing the micro-CT scans.
Role of funding source
The animal husbandry was supported by AOT AG Switzerland.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. Ph. Cattin and P. Jürgens are co-founders of AOT AG.
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
Not applicable due to an animal study.
- 3.Kuttenberger JJ, Stübinger S, Waibel A, Werner M, Klasing M, Ivanenko M, Hering P, Von Rechenberg B, Sader R, Zeilhofer HF. (2080) Computer-guided CO2-laser osteotomy of the sheep tibia: technical prerequisites and first results. Photomed Laser Surg 26:129–136Google Scholar
- 5.Akyol UK, Güngörmüs M, Gündogdu C, Erdem H (2009) Histologic evaluation of the effects of Er:YAG laser on bone ablation. J Contemp Dent Pract 10:65–72Google Scholar
- 8.Nunamaker D (1989) Experimental models of fracture repair. J Clin Orthop Rel Res 5:355Google Scholar
- 11.Schulz G, Götz C, Müller-Gerbl M, Zanette I, Zdora MC, Khimchenko A, Deyhle H, Thalmann P, Müller B (2016) Multimodal imaging of the human knee down to the cellular level. X-ray Microscopy Conference. J Physics 849:1–4Google Scholar
- 14.Baek KW, Deibel W, Marinov D, Griessen M, Dard M, Bruno A, Zeilhofer HF, Cattin P, Jürgens P (2015) Clinical applicability of robot-guided contact free laser osteotomy in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: in-vitro simulation and in-vivo surgery in minipig mandibles. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:976–981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bayly JG, Kartha VB, Stevens WH. (1963) The absorption spectra of liquid phase H2O, HDO, D2o from 0.7μm to 10 μm. Infrared Phys 3:211–223Google Scholar
- 18.Trost D, Zacherl A, Smith M. (1992) Surgical laser properties and their tissue interaction. St. Louis: Mosby-Year BookGoogle Scholar
- 24.Zhang Y, Pfeiffer T, Weller M, Wieser W, Huber R, Raczkowsky J, Schipper J, Wörn H, Klenzner T (2014) Optical coherence tomography guided laser cochleostomy: towards the accuracy on tens of micrometer scale. Biomed Res Int 11:251–284Google Scholar