Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 33, Issue 6, pp 1295–1306 | Cite as

Multiple laser pulses in conjunction with an optical clearing agent to improve the curative effect of cutaneous vascular lesions

  • Jun Ma
  • Bin Chen
  • Dong Li
  • Yue Zhang
  • Zhaoxia Ying
Original Article


Port-wine stain (PWS) birthmark is a congenital microvascular malformation of the skin. A 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser can achieve a deeper treatment, but the weak absorption by blood limits its clinical application. Multiple laser pulses (MLPs) are a potential solution to enhance the curative effect of a Nd:YAG laser. To reduce the pulse number (pn) required for the thermal destruction of the blood vessel, the effect of glucose in conjunction with MLP was investigated. In vivo experiments were performed on a dorsal skin chamber model. Different concentrations (20, 25, 30, and 40%) of glucose were applied to the sub-dermal side of the hamster skin before laser irradiation. Identical vessels with diameters of 200 ± 30 and 110 ± 20 μm were chosen as representatives of typical PWS vessels. Instant thermal responses of the blood vessel were recorded by a high-speed camera. The required pn for blood vessel damage was compared with that without glucose pretreatment. Results showed that the use of glucose with a concentration of 20% combined with MLP Nd:YAG laser to damage blood vessels is more appropriate because severe hemorrhage or carbonization easily appeared in blood vessels at higher glucose concentration of 25, 30, and 40%. When 20% glycerol is pretreated on the sub-dermal hamster skin, the required pn for blood vessel damage can be significantly decreased for different power densities. For example, pn can be reduced by 40% when the power density is 57 J/cm2. In addition, generation of cavitation and bubbles in blood vessels is difficult upon pretreatment with glucose. The combination of glucose with MLP Nd:YAG laser could be an effective protocol for reducing the pn required for blood vessel damage. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) and human trials will be conducted in the future.


Port-wine stain Laser therapy Multiple laser pulses Glucose Optical cleaning agent 



This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51727811) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University.


This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51727811).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Schneider BV, Mitsuhashi Y, Schnyder UW (1988) Ultrastructural observations in port wine stains [J]. Arch Dermatol Res 280(6):338–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barsky SH, Rosen S, Geer DE, Noe JM (1980) The nature and evolution of port wine stains: a computer-assisted study [J]. J Invest Dermatol 74(3):154–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation [J]. Science 220(4596):524–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen JK, Ghasri P, Aguilar G et al (2012) An overview of clinical and experimental treatment modalities for port wine stains [J]. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(2):289–304CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Woo WK, Handley JM (2003) Does fluence matter in the laser treatment of port-wine stains? [J]. Clin Exp Dermatol 28(5):556–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu S, Yang C, Yang S (2012) Long-pulsed 1,064-nm high-energy dye laser improves resistant port wine stains: 20 report cases [J]. Laser Med Sci 27:1225–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang MU, Yaroslavsky AN, Farinelli WA et al (2006) Long-pulsed neodymium: yttrium- aluminum-garnet laser treatment for port wine stains [J]. J Am Acad Dermatol 54(3):480–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li D, Farshidi D, Wang GX et al (2014) A comparison of microvascular responses to visible and near-infrared lasers [J]. Laser Surg Med 46(6):479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jia W, Nadia Tran BS, Victor Sun BS et al (2012) Photocoagulation of dermal blood vessels with multiple laser pulses in an in vivo microvascular model [J]. Lasers Med Sci 44(2):144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li D, Li RH, Jia H, Chen B, Wu WJ, Ying ZX (2017) Experimental and numerical investigation on the transient vascular thermal response to multi-pulse Nd:YAG laser [J]. Lasers Surg Med 46(6):479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hao J, Chen B, Dong L (2017) Dynamic optical absorption characteristics of blood after slow and fast heating [J]. Laser Med Sci 32(3):513–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aguilar G, Díaz SH, Lavernia EJ et al (2002) Cryogen spray cooling efficiency: improvement of port wine stain laser therapy through multiple-intermittent cryogen spurts and laser pulses [J]. Laser Surg Med 31(1):27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verkruysse W, van Gemert MJ, Smithies DJ et al (2000) Modelling multiple laser pulses for port wine stain treatment. Phys Med Biol 45(12):197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tan OT, Hurwitz RM, Stafford TJ (1996) Single or multiple pulses in the use of the pulsed dye laser for the treatment of port-wine stains [J]. Laser Med Sci 11(3):205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tuchin VV, Maksimova IL, Zimnyakov DA et al (1997) Light propagation in tissues with controlled optical properties [J]. J Biomed Opt 2(4):401–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tuchin VV (2005) Optical clearing of tissues and blood. SPIE Press, BellinghamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tuchin VV (2005) Optical clearing of tissues and blood using the immersion method [J]. J Phys D Appl Phys 38(15):2497–2518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Genina EA, Bashkatov AN, Tuchin VV (2010) Tissue optical immersion clearing [J]. Expert Rev Med Devices 7(6):825–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu D, Larin KV, Luo Q et al (2013) Recent progress in tissue optical clearing [J]. Laser Photonics Rev 7(5):732–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang RK, Tuchin VV (2003) Enhance light penetration in tissue for high resolution optical imaging echniques by the use of biocompatible chemical agents [J]. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 10(3):167–176Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang RK, Xu X, Tuchin VV et al (2001) Concurrent enhancement of imaging depth and contrast for optical coherence tomography by hyperosmotic agents [J]. J Opt Soc Am B 18(7):948–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhu D, Wang J, Zhi Z et al (2010) Imaging dermal blood flow through the intact rat skin with an optical clearing method [J]. J Biomed Opt 15(2):026008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Galanzha EI, Tuchin VV, Solovieva AV et al (2003) Skin backreflectance and microvascular system functioning at the action of osmotic agents [J]. J Phys D Appl Phys 36(14):1739–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Choi B, Majaron B, Vargas G et al (2003) In vivo results using photothermal tomography for imaging cutaneous blood vessels [J]. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 5047:350–361Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bashkatov AN, Korolevich AN, Tuchin VV et al (2006) In vivo investigation of human skin optical clearing and blood microcirculation under the action of glucose solution [J]. Asian J Phys 15(1):15.1–15.14Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vargas G, Barton JK, Welch AJ (2008) Use of hyperosmotic chemical agent to improve the laser treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions [J]. Biomed Opt 13(2):21114-1–21114-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ma J, Chen B, Zhang Y, Dong L, Xing L (2017) Multiple laser pulses in conjunction with an optical clearing agent to improve the curative effect of cutaneous vascular lesions [J]. Laser Med Sci, online.
  28. 28.
    Tuchin VV (2011) 5. Optical properties of flowing blood cells. Advanced optical flow cytometry: methods and disease diagnoses. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, pp 95–132.
  29. 29.
    Tuchin VV, Xu X, Wang RK (2002) Dynamic optical coherence tomography in studies of optical clearing, sedimentation, and aggregation of immersed blood [J]. Appl Opt 41:258–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xu X, Wang RK, Elder JB et al (2003) Effect of dextran-induced changes in refractive index and aggregation on optical properties of whole blood [J]. Phys Med Biol 48:1205–1221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu X, Yu L, Chen Z (2008) Effect of erythrocyte aggregation on hematocrit measurement using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography [J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(9):2753–2758PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lucassen GW, Svaasand LO, Verkruysse W et al (1995) Laser energy threshold for thermal vascular injury in a port-wine stain skin model [J]. Laser Med Sci 10(4):231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pfefer TJ, Barton JK, Smithies DJ, Milner TE, Nelson JS, van Gemert MJ, Welch AJ (1999) Welch modeling laser treatment of port wine stains with a computer-reconstructed biopsy [J]. Lasers Surg Med 24(1):151–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Boergen KP, Birngruber R, Gabel VP, Hillenkamp F (1977) Experimental studies on controlled closure of small vessels by laser irradiation [J]. Laser Surg Med Biol Proc 5:15.1–15.9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations