Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 539–547 | Cite as

The effect of polarized light on the organization of collagen secreted by fibroblasts

  • Dana Akilbekova
  • Anuraag Boddupalli
  • Kaitlin M. Bratlie
Original Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the beneficial effect of low-power lasers and polarized light on wound healing, inflammation, and the treatment of rheumatologic and neurologic disorders. The overall effect of laser irradiation treatment is still controversial due to the lack of studies on the biochemical mechanisms and the optimal parameters for the incident light that should be chosen for particular applications. Here, we study how NIH/3T3 fibroblasts respond to irradiation with linearly polarized light at different polarization angles. In particular, we examined vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion, differentiation to myofibroblasts, and collagen organization in response to 800 nm polarized light at 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° with a power density of 40 mW/cm2 for 6 min every day for 6 days. Additional experiments were conducted in which the polarization angle of the incident was changed every day to induce an isotropic distribution of collagen. The data presented here shows that polarized light can upregulate VEGF production, myofibroblast differentiation, and induce different collagen organization in response to different polarization angles of the incident beam. These results are encouraging and demonstrate possible methods for controlling cell response through the polarization angle of the laser light, which has potential for the treatment of wounds.

Keywords

Collagen Second harmonic generation Fibroblasts 

Notes

Author contributions

D.A. and K.M.B. designed the study. D.A. and A.B. performed experiments. D.A. and A.B. analyzed data. D.A., A.B., and K.M.B. wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

No animal subjects were involved in this study.

Informed consent

No human subjects were involved in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Fratzl P (2008) Collagen: structure and mechanics. Collagen: Structure and Mechanics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73906-9
  2. 2.
    Cameron GJ, Alberts IL, Laing JH, Wess TJ (2002) Structure of type I and type III heterotypic collagen fibrils: an X-ray diffraction study. J Struct Biol 137:15–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yasui T, Tohno Y, Araki T (2004) Characterization of collagen orientation in human dermis by two-dimensional second-harmonic-generation polarimetry. J Biomed Opt 9:259–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beanes SR, Dang C, Soo C, Ting K (2003) Skin repair and scar formation: the central role of TGF-[beta]. Expert Rev Mol Med 5:1–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin P (1997) Wound healing—aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 276(80):75–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broughton G, Janis JE, Attinger CE (2006) The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:12S–34SCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 20:86–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson J, Biological M (2001) Responses to materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 31:81–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luttikhuizen DT, Harmsen MC, Van Luyn MJA (2006) Cellular and molecular dynamics in the foreign body reaction. Tissue Eng 12:1955–1970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang L, Jennings TA, Eaton JW (1998) Mast cells mediate acute inflammatory responses to implanted biomaterials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:8841–8846CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown RA (2002) Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:349–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT (2008) Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453:314–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen WL et al (2009) Second harmonic generation χ tensor microscopy for tissue imaging. Appl Phys Lett 94:2007–2010Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gay S, Vijanto J, Raekallio J, Penttinen R (1978) Collagen types in early phases of wound healing in children. Acta Chir Scand 144:205–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stuart K, Panitch A (2009) Characterization of gels composed of blends of collagen I, collagen III, and chondroitin sulfate. Biomacromolecules 10:25–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu SH, Yang RS, Al-Shaikh R, Lane JM (1995) Collagen in tendon, ligament, and bone healing. A current review. Clin Orthop Relat Res:265–278Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Volk SW, Wang Y, Mauldin EA, Liechty KW, Adams SL (2011) Diminished type III collagen promotes myofibroblast differentiation and increases scar deposition in cutaneous wound healing. Cells Tissues Organs 194:25–37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jacob JT, Gebhardt BM, Lewando J (1996) Synthetic scleral reinforcement materials. II. Collagen types in the fibrous capsule. J Biomed Mater Res 32:181–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shannon C, Thull R, Von Recum A (1997) Types I and III collagen in the tissue capsules of titanium and stainless-steel implants. J Biomed Mater Res 34:401–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erikson A, Lindgren M, Davies CDL (2008) Second-harmonic generation in collagen as a potential cancer diagnostic parameter. J Biomed Opt 13:1–11Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Zuijlen PPM et al (2003) Collagen morphology in human skin and scar tissue: no adaptations in response to mechanical loading at joints. Burns 29:423–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Netti PA, Berk DA, Swartz MA, Grodzinsky AJ, Jain RK (2000) Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. Cancer Res 60:2497–2503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Provenzano PP et al (2006) Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion. BMC Med 4:38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mester E, Ludany G, Sellyei M, Szende B, Gyenes GTG (1968) Studies on the inhibiting and activating effects of laser beams. Langenbecks Arch Chir 322:1022–1027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chung H et al (2012) The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng 40:516–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gupta A, Avci P, Sadasivam M et al (2012) Shining light on nanotechnology to help repair and regeneration. Biotechnol Adv 31:607–631CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Posten W, Wrone DA, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Silapunt S (2005) Low-level laser therapy for wound healing: mechanism and efficiency. Dermatol Surg 31:334–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bjordal JM, Couppe C, Chow RT, Tuner J (2003) A systematic review of low level laser therapy with location-specific doses for pain from chronic joint disorders. Aust J Physiother 49:107–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trimmer PA, Schwartz KM, Borland MK, De Taboada L, Streeter J, Oron U (2009) Reduced axonal transport in Parkinson’s disease cybrid neurites is restored by light therapy. Mol Neurodegener 4:26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kipshidze N et al (2001) Low-power Helium: neon laser irradiation enhances production of vascular endothelial growth factor and promotes growth of endothelial cells. In Vitro 364:355–364Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Monstrey S et al (2001) The effect of polarized light on wound healing. Eur J Plast Surg 24:377–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ribeiro MS, Da Silva DF, De Araújo CE, De Oliveira SF, Pelegrini CM, Zorn TM (2004) Effects of low-intensity polarized visible laser radiation on skin burns: a light microscopy study. J Clin Laser Med Surg 22:59–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Demidova-rice TN, Salomatina EV, Yaroslavsky AN, Herman IM, Hamblin MR (2007) Low-level light stimulates excisional wound healing in mice. Lasers Surg Med 39:706–715CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kana JS, Hutschenreiter G, Haina D (1981) Effect of low-power density laser radiation on healing of open skin wounds in rats. Arch Surg 116:293–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sommer AP, Pinheiro AL, Mester AR, Franke RP (2001) Biostimulatory windows in low-intensity laser activation: lasers, scanners, and NASA’s light-emitting diode array system. J Clin Laser Med Surg 19:29–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pinheiro ALB, Pozza DH, De Oliveira MG, Weissmann R, Ramalho LMP (2005) Polarized light (400–2000 nm) and non-ablative laser (685 nm): a description of the wound healing process using immunohistochemical analysis. Photomed. Laser Surg. 23:485–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yasui T, Tohno Y, Araki T (2004) Determination of collagen fiber orientation in human tissue by use of polarization measurement of molecular second-harmonic-generation light. Appl Opt 43:10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Avci P, Gupta A, Sadasivam M, Vecchio D, Pam Z, Pam N (2013) Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: stimulating, healing, restoring. Semin Cutan Med Surg 32:41–52PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ali AM, Jemeel EI (2013) Improvement of wound healing in rabbit skin by low level polarized laser light. Iraqi Journal of Applied Physics 9:29–32Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    da Silva DF, Vidal BC, Zezell DM, Zorn TM, Nuñez SC, Ribeiro MS (2006) Collagen birefringence in skin repair in response to red polarized-laser therapy. J Biomed Opt 11:024002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fenyö M (1984) Theoretical and experimental basis of biostimulation. Opt Laser Technol 16:209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lanza R (2007) Principles of tissue engineering. Elsevier ScienceGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wenzel GI, Anvari B, Mazhar A, Pikkula B, Oghalai JS (2007) Laser-induced collagen remodeling and deposition within the basilar membrane of the mouse cochlea. J Biomed Opt 12Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fung DT, Ng GY, Leung MC (2002) Therapeutic low energy laser improves the mechanical strength of repairing medial collateral ligamen. Lasers Surg Med 31:91–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Moody BR, McCarthy JE, Hruza GJ, Alam M (2003) Collagen remodeling after 585-nm pulsed dye laser irradiation: an ultrasonographic analysis. Dermatologic Surg 29:997–1000Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sarrazy V, Billet F, Micallef L, Coulomb B, Desmoulière A (2011) Mechanisms of pathological scarring: role of myofibroblasts and current developments. Wound Repair Regen 19:10–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Plotnikov SV, Millard AC, Campagnola PJ, Mohler WA (2006) Characterization of the myosin-based source for second-harmonic generation from muscle sarcomeres. Biophys J 90:693–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stoller PC, Celliers PM, Reiser KM, Rubenchik AM (2002) Imaging collagen orientation using polarization-modulated second harmonic generation. Multiphot Microsc Biomed Sci II 4620:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Plotnikov S, Juneja V, Isaacson AB, Mohler WA, Campagnola PJ (2006) Optical clearing for improved contrast in second harmonic generation imaging of skeletal muscle. Biophys J 90:328–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gavin, H. P. (2013) The Levenberg-Marquardt method for nonlinear least squares curve-fitting problems. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Stojadinovic OKA, Kodra A, Golinko M, Tomic-Canic M, Brem H (2007) A novel, non-angiogenic, mechanism of VEGF: stimulation of keratinocyte and fibroblast migration. Wound Repair Regen 15:A30–A30Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C (2002) Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:346–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kyriakides TR, Bornstein P (2003) Matricellular proteins as modulators of wound healing and the foreign body response. Thromb Haemost 90:986–992.  https://doi.org/10.1160/TH03-06-0399 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Karu T (1999) Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells. J Photochem Photobiol B 49:1–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kertesza MI, Fenyöb E (1982) Hypothetical physical model for laser biostimulation. Opt Laser Technol 14:31–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yu HS, Chang KL, Yu CL, Chen JW (1996) Low-energy helium-neon laser irradiation stimulates interleukin-1 alpha and interleukin-8 release from cultured human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 107:593–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kipshidze N, Nikolaychik V, Keelan MH, Shankar LR, Khanna A, Kornowski R, Leon M (2010) Low-power helium: neon laser irradiation enhances production of vascular endothelial growth factor and promotes growth of endothelial cells in vitro. Lasers Surg Med 28:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Feng J, Zhang Y, Xing D (2012) Low-power laser irradiation (LPLI) promotes VEGF expression and vascular endothelial cell proliferation through the activation of ERK/Sp1 pathway. Cell Signal 24:1116–1125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang WG, Wu CY, Pan WX, Tian L (2004) Low-power helium-neon laser irradiation enhances the expression of VEGF in murine myocardium. Chin Med J 117:1476–1480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Brem H et al (2009) Mechanism of sustained release of vascular endothelial growth factor in accelerating experimental diabetic healing. J Invest Dermatol 129:2275–2287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hutchison N, Fligny C (2013) Resident mesenchymal cells and fibrosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1932:962–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Laboratory AstanaNazarbayev UniversityAstanaKazakhstan
  2. 2.Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  4. 4.Division of Materials Science and EngineeringAmes National LaboratoryAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations