Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 497–501 | Cite as

Photobiomodulation effect on children’s scars

  • Jehan Alsharnoubi
  • Omnia Mohamed
Original Article


The management of burn scars has become one of the major clinical challenges in the developing countries which involve enormous treatment cost; this needs new methods for better cost benefit relationship. The objective of the study is to analyze the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy on post-burn scar tissue in children. A randomized controlled study included 15 children, ranging from 2 to 10 years of age, presenting with burn scars. They received diode laser and topical treatment. Each scar was divided into two halves. One half was treated with laser therapy and topical treatment (study area), and the other half was treated with topical treatment only (control area). The children were evaluated before and after 3 months of the study by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), ultrasonography (U/S), and laser Doppler perfusion imaging. Significant improvement was reported in the studied area compared to the control area for patients with P values (P = 0.005) and (P = 0.0001) for VSS and U/S scores, respectively. No difference was detected for blood perfusion to the scar between both areas (P = 0.18). In addition, no adverse effect was reported. Photobiomodulation is an efficient and safe therapeutic modality for post-burn hypertrophic scars in children and should be considered a part of combination therapy for better results.


Burn Scars Photobiomodulation 



We would like to thank all workers in pediatrics and burn clinics in Cairo University for their cooperation during the research.

Also ASLM for giving us a chance to attend the conference.

Funding sources

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The research was done after the approval of the Laser Institute.

The work received fund from the ASLMS only as a travel grant.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research ethical committee

All patients and parents approved and signed the informed consent before the treatment; the informed consent contained all the research details.


  1. 1.
    Ferguson MW, Duncan J, Bond J, Bush J, Durani P, Laverty H (2009) Prophylactic administration of avotermin for improvement of skin scarring: three double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I/II studies. Lancet 373(9671):1264–1274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alster TS, Tanzi EL (2003) Hypertrophic scars and keloids. Am J Clin Dermatol 4(4):235–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aarabi S, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC (2007) Hypertrophic scar formation following burns and trauma: new approaches to treatment. PLoS Med 4(9):e234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim W-S, Glen Calderhead R (2011) Is light-emitting diode phototherapy (LED-LLLT) really effective? Laser Ther 20(3):205–215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Webb C, Dyson M (2003) The effect of 880 nm low level laser energy on human fibroblast cell numbers: a possible role in hypertrophic wound healing. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 70(1):39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gauglitz GG (2013) Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars: current and emerging options. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 6:103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marques NCT, Neto NL, Prado MTO, Vitor LLR, Oliveira RC, et al (2017) Effects of PBM in different energy densities and irradiance on maintaining cell viability and proliferation of pulp fibroblasts from human primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci 32(7):1621–1628Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H (2010) A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty 10:e43PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freitas CP, Melo C, Alexandrino AM, Noites A (2013) Efficacy of low-level laser therapy on scar tissue. J Cosmet Laser Ther 15:171–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Widgerow AD (2011) Cellular/extracellular matrix cross-talk in scar evolution and control. Wound Repair Regen 19(2):117–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moravvaej H, Daneshvar L, Saeedi M, Barzegar MR (2011) Treatment of a pigmented hypertrophic scar by low-level laser therapy (LLLT): a case report. J Lasers Med Sci 1(1):35–38Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gaida K, Koller R, Isler C, Aytekin O, Al-Awami M, Meissl G, Frey M (2004) Low level laser therapy—a conservative approach to the burn scar? J Burns 30:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denise H, Hawkins M, Abrahamse H (2006) The role of laser fluence in cell viability, proliferation, and membrane integrity of wounded human skin fibroblasts following helium-neon laser irradiation. Lasers Surg Med 38(1):74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zungu IL, Hawkins Evans D, Abrahamse H (2009) Mitochondrial responses of normal and injured human skin fibroblasts following low level laser irradiation—an in vitro study. Photochem Photobiol 85(4):987–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hawkins D, Abrahamse H (2006) Effect of multiple exposures of low-level laser therapy on the cellular responses of wounded human skin fibroblasts. Photomed Laser Ther 24(6):705–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Evans DH, Abrahamse H (2008) Efficacy of three different laser wavelengths for in vitro wound healing. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 24(4):199–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brusselaers N, Pirayesh A, Hoeksema H, Verbelen J, Blot S, Monstrey S (2010) Burn scar assessment: a systematic review of objective scar assessment tools. Burns 36:1157–1164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindblom L, Cassuto J, Yregård L, Tarnow P, Räntfors J, Hendén PL (2000) Importance of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in the regulation of burn perfusion. Burns 26(5):435–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bray R, Forrester K, Leonard C (2003) Laser Doppler imaging of burn scars: a comparison of wavelength and scanning methods. Burns 29:199–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stewart CJ, Frank R, Forrester KR, Tulip J, Lindsay R, Bray RC (2005) A comparison of two laser-based methods for determination of burn scar perfusion: laser Doppler versus laser speckle imaging. Burns 31(6):744–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pediatrics Department, National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences (N.I.L.E.S)Cairo UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Pediatrics DepartmentAboelreesh HospitalCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations