Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between one-session root canal treatment with aPDT and two-session treatment with calcium hydroxide-based antibacterial dressing, in dog’s teeth with apical periodontitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate one-session endodontic treatment with aPDT and two-session treatment with calcium hydroxide (CH)-based dressing in dog’s teeth with apical periodontitis. After experimental induction of apical periodontitis, 48 teeth were randomly assigned to the following groups: groups OS/aPDT120d and OS/aPDT180d (one-session treatment with aPDT) and groups TS/CH120d and TS/CH180d (two-session treatment with CH-based dressing—control groups). The animals were euthanized after 120 and 180 days. After histotechnical processing, microscopic and radiographic analyses were performed. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher’s exact tests (α = 0.05). Groups TS/CHs presented repaired resorbed cemental areas, with collagen bundles and few inflammatory cells. In groups OS/aPDTs, the areas of cemental resorption were not repaired with reduced presence of cells and fibers. In the analysis of the apical closure, fluorescence microscopy and percentage of radiographic reduction of lesions, there was significant difference between groups TS/CH120d and OS/aPDT120d and between TS/CH180d and OS/aPDT180d (p < 0.05). Groups TS/CHs had weak RANKL expression and positive immunostaining for RANK and OPG. In OS/aPDT120d, there was positive immunostaining for RANKL. In OS/aPDT180d, the three osteoclastogenesis markers were expressed. The results using aPDT were worse than those obtained with two-session endodontic treatment using a CH-based dressing in teeth with apical periodontitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nair PNR (2004) Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15:348–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Gadê-Neto CR et al (2004) Microbiological examination of infected dental root canals. Oral Microbiol Immunol 19:71–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H (2009) Australian endodontists’ perceptions of single and multiple visit root canal treatment. Int Endod J 42:811–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vera J, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D et al (2012) One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study. J Endod 38:1040–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silva LA, Novaes AB Jr, de Oliveira RR, Nelson-Filho P, Santamaria M Jr, Silva RA (2012) Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histopathological evaluation. J Endod 38:360–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gursoy H, Ozcakir-Tomruk C, Tanalp J et al (2013) Photodynamic therapy in dentistry: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig 17:1113–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chrepa V, Kotsakis GA, Pagonis TC, Hargreaves KM (2014) The effect of photodynamic therapy in root canal disinfection: a systematic review. J Endod 40:891–898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Trindade AC, De Figueiredo JA, Steier L, Weber JB (2015) Photodynamic therapy in endodontics: a literature review. Photomed Laser Surg 33:175–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Borsatto MC, Correa-Afonso AM, Lucisano MP et al (2015) One-session root canal treatment with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT): an in vivo study. Int Endod J doi. doi:10.1111/iej.12486

    Google Scholar 

  10. Konopka KE, Goslinski T (2007) Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res 86:694–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamblin MR, Hasan T (2004) Photodynamic therapy: a new antimicrobial approach to infectious disease? Photochem Photobiol Sci 3:436–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Soukos NS, Chen PS, Morris JT et al (2006) Photodynamic therapy for endodontic disinfection. J Endod 32:979–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foschi F, Fontana CR, Ruggiero K et al (2007) Photodynamic inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis in dental root canals in vitro. Lasers Surg Med 39:782–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fimple JL, Fontana CR, Foschi F et al (2008) Photodynamic treatment of endodontic polymicrobial infection in vitro. J Endod 34:728–734

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Garcez AS, Nuñez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS (2008) Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion. J Endod 34:138–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcez AS, Nuñez SC, Hamblim MR, Suzuki H, Ribeiro MS (2010) Photodynamic therapy associated with conventional endodontic treatment in patients with antibiotic-resistant microflora: a preliminary report. J Endod 36:1463–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng R, Singh F, Papamanou DA et al (2011) Endodontic photodynamic therapy ex vivo. J Endod 37:217–222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Meire MA, Coenye T, Nelis HJ, De Moor RJ (2012) Evaluation of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG irradiation, antibacterial photodynamic therapy and sodium hypochlorite treatment on Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. Int Endod J 45:482–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yildirim C, Karaarslan ES, Ozsevik S, Zer Y, Sari T, Usumez A (2013) Antimicrobial efficiency of photodynamic therapy with different irradiation durations. Eur J Dent 7:469–473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Xhevdet A, Stubljar D, Kriznar I et al (2014) The disinfecting efficacy of root canals with laser photodynamic therapy. J Lasers Med Sci 5:19–26

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. da Frota MF, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Bagnato VS, Espir CG, Berbert FL (2015) Photodynamic therapy in root canals contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis using curcumin as photosensitizer. Lasers Med Sci 30:1867–1872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bago Jurič I, Plečko V, Anić I et al (2016) Antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamic therapy, Nd:YAG laser and QMiX solution against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 13:238–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bouillaguet S, Wataha JC, Zapata O, Campo M, Lange N, Schrenzel J (2010) Production of reactive oxygen species from photosensitizers activated with visible light sources available in dental offices. Photomed Laser Surg 28:519–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcez AS, Fregnani ER, Rodriguez HM et al (2013) The use of optical fiber in endodontic photodynamic therapy. Is it really relevant? Lasers Med Sci 28:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Standards ISO (1997) ISO 7405: preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry—tests methods for dental materials. International Organization for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  26. Anić I, Tachibana H, Masumoto K, Qi P (1996) Permeability, morphologic and temperature changes of canal dentine walls induced by Nd: YAG, CO2 and argon lasers. Int Endod J 29:13–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. da Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P, da Silva RA et al (2010) Revascularization and periapical repair after endodontic treatment using apical negative pressure irrigation versus conventional irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing in dogs’ teeth with apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:779–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bezerra da Silva RA, Nelson-Filho P, Lucisano MP, De Rossi A, de Queiroz AM, Bezerra da Silva LA (2014) MyD88 knockout mice develop initial enlarged periapical lesions with increased numbers of neutrophils. Int Endod J 47:675–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohenca N, Romualdo PC, da Silva LA et al (2015) Tissue response to root canal irrigation systems in dogs’ teeth with apical periodontitis. Clin Oral Investig 19:1147–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. da Silva LA, da Silva RA, Branco LG, Navarro VP, Nelson-Filho P (2008) Quantitative radiographic evaluation of periapical bone resorption in dog’s teeth contaminated with bacterial endotoxin (LPS) associated or not with calcium hydroxide. Braz Dent J 19:296–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Paula-Silva FW, Ghosh A, Arzate H, Kapila S, da Silva LA, Kapila YL (2010) Calcium hydroxide promotes cementogenesis and induces cementoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal periodontal ligament cells in a CEMP1- and ERK-dependent manner. Calcif Tissue Int 87:144–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Desai S, Chandler N (2009) Calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers: a review. J Endod 35:475–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kranz S, Guellmar A, Völpel A, Gitter B, Albrecht V, Sigusch BW (2011) Photodynamic suppression of Enterococcus faecalis using the photosensitizer mTHPC. Lasers Surg Med 43:241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2011) Optimising single-visit disinfection with supplementary approaches: a quest for predictability. Aust Endod J 37:92–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harris F, Chatfield LK, Phoenix DA (2005) Phenotiazinium based photosensitizers: photodynamic agents with a multiplicity of cellular targets and clinical applications. Curr Drug Targets 6:615–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Garcia V, Longo M, Fernandes LA et al (2014) Effect of the concentration of phenotiazine photosensitizers in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on bone loss and the immune inflammatory response of induced periodontitis in rats. J Periodontol Res 49:584–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Upadya MH, Kishen A (2010) Influence of bacterial growth modes on the susceptibility to light-activated disinfection. Int Endod J 43:978–987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from The São Paulo State Foundation/FAPESP (Grants: #2012/10238-1 and 2012/14505).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Nelson-Filho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hidalgo, L.R.d.C., da Silva, L.A.B., Nelson-Filho, P. et al. Comparison between one-session root canal treatment with aPDT and two-session treatment with calcium hydroxide-based antibacterial dressing, in dog’s teeth with apical periodontitis. Lasers Med Sci 31, 1481–1491 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2014-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2014-8

Keywords

Navigation