Skip to main content
Log in

Our perspective of the treatment of naevus of Ota with 1,064-, 755- and 532-nm wavelength lasers

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Naevus of Ota (NO) is a disfiguring pigmentary disorder affecting the face. Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (QS Nd:YAG)-1,064 nm is a standard laser treatment because it causes highly selective destruction of melanin within the aberrant dermal melanocytes. However, not all lesions respond. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy/safety of QS Nd:YAG-1,064 nm and the shorter wavelength QS Alexandrite-755 nm and QS Nd:YAG-532 nm lasers in treating NO. Data were evaluated from 21 patients treated in our laser centre from 2004 to 2012. Lesional skin was irradiated with QS-532 nm/QS-755 nm/QS-1,064 nm, with settings titrated according to responses. All received initial test patches to direct initial wavelength choice, with subsequent treatments at 3-monthly intervals until clearance/lack of further response. Laser modality was switched following repeated test patches if there was no or no sustained improvement. Two thirds of patients had ≥90 % improvement compared to baseline photographs. In 20 % of patients, QS-1,064 nm was most efficacious with 97 % mean improvement. The mean improvement was 80 % for those in whom QS-755 nm was superior, and 90 % for QS-532 nm. Median number of overall laser treatments was 8 (range 4–13). Number of treatments required varied significantly according to lesional colour and site: grey lesions and those on the forehead/temple were most resistant. We confirm successful treatment of NO with QS Nd:YAG-1,064 nm and the shorter wavelength QS-755 nm/QS-532 nm lasers without serious or irreversible side effects. We recommend judicious test patch analysis before treatment and a modality switch if complete clearance is not obtained

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ota M (1939) Nevus fusco-caeruleus ophthalmo-maxillaris. Tokyo Med J 63:1243–1245

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hidano A, Kajima H, Ikeda S, Mizutani H et al (1967) Natural history of nevus of Ota. Arch Dermatol 95:187–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnhill RL, Rabinovitz H (2008) Benign melanocytic neoplasms. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP (eds) Dermatology, 2nd edn. Mosby Elsevier, London, pp 1720–1722

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzpatrick TB, Kitamura H, Kukita A, Zeller R (1956) Ocular and dermal melanocytosis. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 56:830–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirayama T, Suzuki T (1991) A new classification of Ota’s nevus based on histopathological features. Dermatologica 183:169–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rho NK, Kim WS, Lee DY, Yang JM et al (2004) Histopathological parameters determining lesion colors in the nevus of Ota: a morphometric study using computer-assisted image analysis. Br J Dermatol 150:1148–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosaka Y, Onizuka T, Ichinose M, Yoshimoto S et al (1995) Treatment of nevus Ota by liquid nitrogen cryotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:703–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumagai N, Fukushi S, Matsuzaki K, Ishida H (1995) Treatment of nevus of Ota with autologous-cultured epithelium grafting combined with dermabrasion. Ann Plast Surg 34:180–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aurangabadkar S (2008) Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of nevus of Ota: an Indian study of 50 patients. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 1:80–84

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herd RM, Dover JS, Arndt KA (1997) Basic laser principles. Dermatol Clin 15:355–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson RR, Margolis RJ, Watenabe S, Flotte T et al (1989) Selective photothermolysis of cutaneous pigmentation by Q-switched Nd:YAG laser pulses at 1064, 532, and 355 nm. J Invest Dermatol 93:28–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sardana K, Chugh S, Garg V (2012) Are Q-switched lasers for nevus of Ota really effective in pigmented skin? Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 78:187–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kar HK, Gupta L (2011) 1064 nm Q switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of nevus of Ota: an Indian open label prospective study of 50 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 77:565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Watanabe S, Hisashi T (1994) Treatment of nevus of Ota with the Q-switched ruby laser. N Engl J Med 331:1745–1750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ha RY, Nojima K, Adams WP, Brown SA (2005) Analysis of facial skin thickness: defining the relative thickness index. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1769–1773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shuster S, Black MM, McVitie E (1975) The influence of age and sex on skin thickness, skin collagen, and density. Br J Dermatol 93:639–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berardesca E, de Rigal J, Leveque JL, Maibach HI (1991) In vivo biophysical characterization of skin physiological differences in races. Dermatologica 182:89–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hakozaki M, Masuda T, Oikawa H, Nara T (1997) Light and electron microscopic investigation of the process of healing of the nevus of Ota by Q-switched alexandrite laser irradiation. Virchows Arch 431:63–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the assistance of Mr. A Vail with the statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Madan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Felton, S.J., Al-Niaimi, F., Ferguson, J.E. et al. Our perspective of the treatment of naevus of Ota with 1,064-, 755- and 532-nm wavelength lasers. Lasers Med Sci 29, 1745–1749 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1332-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1332-3

Keywords

Navigation