Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The 532-nm 180-W (GreenLight®) laser vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms: how durable is the new side-fire fiber with integrated cooling system?

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 532-nm side-fire laser vaporization is established for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia. Meanwhile, the third generation of this system is offered by American Medical Systems, Inc. The laser power increased from 80 and 120 to 180 W from the first to the third generation. Despite good functional results, with the 80- and 120-W systems, the removal of prostate tissue is limited because of fiber degradation. To overcome this problem, the fiber was designed newly with an integrated cooling system and a sensor for decreasing the laser energy in case of overheating. We evaluate whether the new fiber still suffers from degradation with consecutive drop of power transmission during the procedure. The power output of the cooled fiber was measured in vitro and during prostate vaporization in ten patients. Laser beam power was measured at baseline and after the application each of 50 kJ during laser vaporization. Power emission of the fiber remains constant at 20, 80, and 180 W of power settings over the whole 40-kJ lifespan. During the transurethral procedure, a median total energy of 276 kJ (standard deviation 153 kJ) was applied for vaporization. Median power output from the fiber at the end of the procedure was 97 % from the baseline value. There were no fiber malfunctions observed. In contrast to former generations, the third-generation laser fiber is durable without significant power loss during prostate vaporization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Capitán C, Blázquez C, Martin MD et al (2011) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Urol 60:734–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Ansari A, Younes N, Samping VP et al (2010) GreenLight HPS 120 W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow up. Eur Urol 58:349–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pereira-Correia JA, de Moraes Sousa KD, Santos JB et al (2012) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate (<60 mL): a 2-year randomized double-blind prospective urodynamic investigation. BJU Int 110:1184–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seki N, Nomura H, Yamaguchi A et al (2008) Evaluation of the learning curve for photoselective vaporization of the prostate over the course of 74 cases. J Endourol 22:1731–1735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahyai S, Gilling P, Kaplan S et al (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58:384–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler SF et al (2008) GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures. Eur Urol 54:893–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunken C, Seitz C, Tauber S, Schmidt R (2011) Transurethral GreenLight laser enucleation of the prostate—a feasibility study. J Endourol 25:1199–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Malek R, Kang HW, Peng YS et al (2011) Photoselective vaporization prostatectomy: experience with a novel 180 W 532 nm lithium triborate laser and fiber delivery system in living dogs. J Urol 185:712–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Te AE (2006) The next generation in laser treatments and the role of the GreenLight high performance system laser. Rev Urol suppl 8:S24–S30

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schwartz J, Renard J, Wolf JP et al (2010) High-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser fibres for endovaporization of benign prostatic hyperplasia: how much do they deteriorate during the procedure? BJU Int 107:1938–1942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hermanns T, Sulser T, Fatzer M et al (2009) Laser fibre deterioration and loss of power output during photoselective 80-w potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate. Eur Urol 55:679–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermanns T, Strebel D, Hefermehl et al (2011) Lithium triborate laser vaporization of the prostate using the 120 W, high performance system laser: high performance all the way? J Urol 185:2241–2247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heinrich E, Wendt-Nordahl G, Honek P et al (2010) 120 W lithium triborate laser for photoselective vaporization of the prostate: comparison with 80 W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser in an ex-vivo model. J Endourol 24:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bachmann A, Muir G, Collins E et al (2012) 180-W XPS GreenLight laser therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia: early safety, efficacy and perioperative outcome after 201 procedures. Eur Urol 61:600–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The construction of the device for the power measurement was financed by an American Medical Systems, Inc. research grant.

Conflict of interest

C. Brunken and R. Schmidt are consultants at Procter American Medical Systems, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claus Brunken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brunken, C., Munsch, M., Tauber, S. et al. The 532-nm 180-W (GreenLight®) laser vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms: how durable is the new side-fire fiber with integrated cooling system?. Lasers Med Sci 29, 1307–1312 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1320-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1320-7

Keywords

Navigation