Abstract
Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy is a commonly used technique to treat ureteral calculi.The type of energy source used is one of the main influences of retrograd calculi propulsion. Using a momentum pendulum underwater setup the induced momentum and the initial velocity were investigated. Pulsed laser light from three different clinically available laser systems, including a Ho:YAG laser, a frequencydoubled doublepulse (second harmonic generation, SHG) Nd:YAG laser and a flashlamp pumped dye (FLPD) laser, were transmitted via flexible fibres of different core diameter to the front of the pendulum sinker. Single pulses at variable pulse energy, according to the clinical laser parameter settings, were applied to the target sinker, thus causing a repulsioninduced deflection which was documented by video recording. The maximum deflection was determined. Solving the differential equation of a pendulum gives the initial velocity, the laserinduced momentum and the efficiency of momentum transfer. The induced deflection as well as the starting velocity of the two shortduration pulsed laser systems (SHG Nd:YAG, FLPD) were similar (s _{max} = 2–3.6 cm and v _{0} = 150–200 mm/s, respectively), whereas both values were lower using the Ho:YAG laser with a long pulse duration (s _{max} = 0.9–1.6 cm and v _{0} = 60–105 mm/s, respectively). The momentum I induced by the Ho:YAG laser was only 50% and its transfer efficacy η _{Repuls} was reduced to less than 5% of the values of the two shortpulsed laser systems. This investigation clearly showed the variable parts and amounts of repulsion using different pulsed lasers in an objective and reproducible manner. The momentum transfer efficiency could be determined without any physical friction problems. Further investigations are needed to compare stone fragmentation techniques with respect to laser repulsion and its clinical impact.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sofer M, Watterson JD, Wollin TA, Nott L, Razvi H, Denstedt JD (2002) Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167(1):31–34
Cheung MC, Lee F, Yip SK, Tam PC (2001) Outpatient holmium laser lithotripsy using semirigid ureteroscope. Is the treatment outcome affected by stone load? Eur Urol 39(6):702–708
Lee H, Ryan RT, Teichman JM, Kim J, Choi B, Arakeri NV, Welch AJ (2003) Stone retropulsion during holmium:YAG lithotripsy. J Urol 169(3):881–885
Eisner BH, Pengune W, Stoller ML (2009) Use of an antiretropulsion device to prevent stone retropulsion significantly increases the efficiency of pneumatic lithotripsy: an in vitro study. BJU Int 104(6):858–861
Lee HJ, Box GN, Abraham JB, Deane LA, Elchico ER, Eisner BH, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2008) In vitro evaluation of nitinol urological retrieval coil and ureteral occlusion device: retropulsion and holmium laser fragmentation efficiency. J Urol 180(3):969–973
Marguet CG, Sung JC, Springhart WP, L’Esperance JO, Zhou S, Zhong P, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2005) In vitro comparison of stone retropulsion and fragmentation of the frequency doubled, double pulse Nd:YAG laser and the holmium:YAG laser. J Urol 173(5):1797–1800
Watson G, Murray S, Dretler SP, Parrish JA (1987) The pulsed dye laser for fragmenting urinary calculi. J Urol 138(1):195–198
Watson GM, Wickham JE (1986) Initial experience with a pulsed dye laser for ureteric calculi. Lancet 1(8494):1357–1358
Schmeller N, Kriegmair M, Liedl B, Hofstetter A, Muschter R, Thomas S, Knipper A (1990) Laser lithotripsy with automatic shutoff on tissue contact. Urologe A 29(6):309–312
Schmidt A, Eisenberger F (1993) Lasertripsy of ureteral calculi using pulseddye laser with automatic shutoff after tissue contact. J Endourol 7(3):201–204
Dretler SP, Watson G, Parrish JA, Murray S (1987) Pulsed dye laser fragmentation of ureteral calculi: initial clinical experience. J Urol 137(3):386–389
Delvecchio FC, Auge BK, Brizuela RM, Weizer AZ, Zhong P, Preminger GM (2003) In vitro analysis of stone fragmentation ability of the FREDDY laser. J Endourol 17(3):177–179
Ebert A, Stangl J, Kuhn R, Schafhauser W (2003) The frequencydoubled doublepulse neodymium:YAG laser lithotripter (FREDDY) in lithotripsy of urinary stones. First clinical experience. Urologe A 42(6):825–833
Teichman JM (2002) Laser lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol 12(4):305–309
Dubosq F, Pasqui F, Girard F, Beley S, Lesaux N, Gattegno B, Thibault P, Traxer O (2006) Endoscopic lithotripsy and the FREDDY laser: initial experience. J Endourol 20(5):296–299
Fuh E, Haleblian GE, Norris RD, Albala WD, Simmons N, Zhong P, Preminger GM (2007) The effect of frequency doubled double pulse Nd:YAG laser fiber proximity to the target stone on transient cavitation and acoustic emission. J Urol 177(4):1542–1545
Chan KF, Vassar GJ, Pfefer TJ, Teichman JM, Glickman RD, Weintraub ST, Welch AJ (1999) Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: a dominant photothermal ablative mechanism with chemical decomposition of urinary calculi. Lasers Surg Med 25(1):22–37
Vassar GJ, Chan KF, Teichman JM, Glickman RD, Weintraub ST, Pfefer TJ, Welch AJ (1999) Holmium:YAG lithotripsy: photothermal mechanism. J Endourol 13(3):181–190
Grasso M (1996) Experience with the holmium laser as an endoscopic lithotrite. Urology 48(2):199–206
Pierre S, Preminger GM (2007) Holmium laser for stone management. World J Urol 25(3):235–239
Finley DS, Petersen J, Abdelshehid C, Ahlering M, Chou D, Borin J, Eichel L, McDougall E, Clayman RV (2005) Effect of holmium:YAG laser pulse width on lithotripsy retropulsion in vitro. J Endourol 19(8):1041–1044
Kalra P, Le NB, Bagley D (2007) Effect of pulse width on object movement in vitro using holmium:YAG laser. J Endourol 21(2):228–231
Wezel F, Hacker A, Gross AJ, Michel MS, Bach T (2010) Effect of pulse energy, frequency and length on holmium:yttriumaluminumgarnet laser fragmentation efficiency in nonfloating artificial urinary calculi. J Endourol 24(7):1135–1140
Kang HW, Lee H, Teichman JM, Oh J, Kim J, Welch AJ (2006) Dependence of calculus retropulsion on pulse duration during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med 38(8):762–772
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Theoretical basis for the determination of v 0
Appendix: Theoretical basis for the determination of v _{0}
The laserinduced momentum to the pendulum can be derived from differential equations of the pendulum movement and the amplitude of the maximum deflection.
As shown in Fig. 1, there are different forces affecting the movement of the compound pendulum. The Stokes friction F _{Stokes} and the restore force F _{Restore} are acting against the acceleration according to:
After insertion of the parameters of the forces this equation changes to:
Further approximating
and substitution of the Eigen angular frequency:
the differential equation according to Eq. A3 can be derived:
By introducing of the dimensionless term \( \tau = {\omega_0} \cdot t \), Eq. A3 becomes Eq. A4:
Further introduction of the Lehr damping module D results in Eq. A5:
with \( D = \frac{\delta }{{{\omega_0}}} = \frac{{3 \cdot \pi \cdot {\eta_{{{H_2}O}}} \cdot r}}{{m \cdot \sqrt {{\frac{g}{L}}} }} \)
D characterizes the method of damping. Weak damping is characterized by D values in the range 0–1.
The solution of to Eq. A5 is given by Eq. A6:
And the overall solution for weakly damped compound pendulum movement by Eq. A7:
This can be changed using trigonometric expressions to:
And finally substitution of \( \tau = {\omega_0} \cdot t \):
The constant A and B can be determined by the deflection under the starting conditions s _{0} and velocity v _{0} at time t = 0:
According to the experiments the starting conditions are:

a
deflection at t = 0: s _{0} = 0

b
velocity at maximum deflection: \( \dot{s}\left( {{t_{{\max }}}} \right) = 0 \)
Using the starting conditions and theoretical evaluation of t _{max}:
The overall solution looks like
Using Eq. A11, the starting velocity v _{0} can be derived as Eq. 3:
with
and
and
Abbreviations:
 ω _{0} :

Eigen angular frequency
 s _{max} :

maximum deflection
 t _{max} :

time to reach maximum deflection
 m :

mass of the lead ball
 r :

radius of the ball
 s :

deflection
 L :

length of pendulum
 g :

gravity constant
 Θ :

deflection angle
 η _{H2O} :

viscosity of water
 D :

Lehr damping module
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sroka, R., Haseke, N., Pongratz, T. et al. In vitro investigations of repulsion during laser lithotripsy using a pendulum setup. Lasers Med Sci 27, 637–643 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s1010301109920
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s1010301109920