Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical evaluation of demineralization and remineralization of intact root surface lesions in the clinic by a quantitative light-induced fluorescence system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detection of demineralization of root surface caries is an important issue since preventive approaches prolong tooth life. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) has been shown to be useful for the laboratory assessment of demineralization of root surfaces. The aim of this study was to determine the demineralization and remineralization of root surface intact and cavitated caries lesions using a QLF system as a nondestructive in vivo method. Noncavitated and demineralized root surface lesions were detected and scored using the QLF system. Oral hygiene education was given and periodontal cleaning was completed before the remineralization treatment. After obtaining baseline QLF data, the patients were informed about the remineralization treatment. Fluoride varnish was applied to the carious lesions at the baseline visit, and the patients were then reviewed after 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks, with QLF assessment and fluoride varnish application repeated at each review. Repeated-measures ANOVA (α = 0.05) showed significant differences between ΔQ values at each visit (p < 0.001); ΔQ showed marked decreases at all the cut-off values (15, 20, 25, 30). The changes in ΔQ were not affected by the cut-off value. The ΔQ values of QLF showed differences at all visits. The QLF system was able to detect early root surface caries lesions in vivo. Bifluoride 12 varnish improved mineral levels as shown by the QLF system. The treatment response to chemicals of intact noncavitated root surface carious lesions could be followed nondestructively in the clinic using QLF to quantify remineralization at recall visits. Teeth with root surface caries can be kept by controlling their remineralization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fure S, Zickert I (1990) Prevalence of root surface caries in 55, 65, and 75-year-old Swedish individuals. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 18:100–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hellyer PH, Beighton D, Heath MR, Lynch EJ (1990) Root caries in older people attending a general dental practice in East Sussex. Br Dent J 169:201–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fejerskov O, Luan W-M, Nyvad B, Budtz-Jörgensen E, Holm-Pedersen P (1991) Active and inactive root caries lesions in a selected group of 60- to 80-year-old Danes. Caries Res 25:385–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Locker D, Slade GD, Leake JL (1989) Prevalence of and factors associated with root decay in older adults in Canada. J Dent Res 68(5):768–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyvad B, Fejerskov O (1982) Root surface caries: clinical, histopathological and microbiological features and clinical implications. Int Dent J 32:312–326

    Google Scholar 

  6. Angmar-Månsson B, Al-Khateeb S, Tranæus S (1996) Monitoring the caries process. Optical methods for clinical diagnosis and quantification of enamel caries. Eur J Oral Sci 104:480–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bayne CS, Thompson YJ, Taylor FD (2002) Dental materials. In: Roberson MT, Heymann HO, Swift JE (eds) Operative dentistry, 4th edn, Mosby, St. Louis, pp 133–235

    Google Scholar 

  8. ten Cate JM, de Josselin de Jong E, Exterkate RAM, Sundström G, Angmar-Månsson B (1996) Quantification of enamel demineralization with a new portable fluorescence device, validated by microradiography. Caries Res 30:299, abstract 97

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Khateeb S, Oliveby A, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Månsson B (1997) Laser fluorescence quantification of remineralization in situ of incipient enamel lesions: influence of fluoride supplements. Caries Res 31:132–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Verdonschot EH, Angmar-Mansson B (2003) Advanced methods of caries diagnosis and quantification. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds) Dental caries. The disease and its clinical management. Blackwell Munksgard, Frederiksberg, pp 129–139

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ando M, Hall AF, Eckert GJ, Schemehorn BR, Analoui M, Stookey GK (1997) Relative ability of laser fluorescence techniques to quantitate early mineral loss in vitro. Caries Res 31:125–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. de Josselin de Jong E, Hall AF, van der Veen M (1996) Quantitative light-induced fluorescence detection method. A Monte Carlo simulation model. In: Stookey GK (ed) Early detection of dental caries. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Indiana Conference. Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, pp 91–104

    Google Scholar 

  13. Emami Z, Al-Khateeb S, de Josselin de Jong E, Sundström F, Trollsas K, Angmar-Mansson B (1996) Mineral loss in incipient caries lesions quantified with laser fluorescence and longitudinal microradiography. A methodologic study. Acta Odontol Scand 54:8–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heinrich-Weltzien R, Kühnisch J, van der Veen M, de Josselin de Jong E, Stöβer L (2003) Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) - a potential method for the dental practitioner. Quintessence Int 34:181–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Veen M (1995) Quantification of root surface carious lesions. Doctoral Thesis. Groningen University, The Netherlands

  16. Chow LC, Takagi S, Carey CM, Sieck BA (2000) Remineralization effects of a two-solution fluoride mouthrinse: an in situ study. J Dent Res 79(4):991–995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vlacic J, Meyers IA, Walsh LJ (2007) Combined CPP-ACP and photoactivated disinfection (PAD) therapy in arresting root surface caries: a case report. Br Dent J 203:457–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ashley PF, Blinkhorn AS, Davies RM (1998) Occlusal caries diagnosis: an in vitro histological validation of the electronic caries monitor (ECM) and other methods. J Dent 26(2):83–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bozkurt F (2003) Evaluation of different methods on detection of early enamel caries lesion produced by microbial model and its remineralization. Doctoral Thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul, Türkiye

  20. ten Bosch JJ, Van der Mei HC, Borsboom PCF (1984) Optical monitor of in vitro caries. Caries Res 18:540–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hellyer PH, Lynch E (1992) Root caries an old problem. In: General dental treatment. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 15–81

  22. Billings RJ, Brown LR, Kaster AG (1985) Contemporary treatment strategies for root surface dental caries. Gerodontics 1(1):20–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Benedict HC (1928) Note on the fluorescence of teeth in ultraviolet rays. Science 67:442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van der Veen MH, ten Bosch JJ (1996) A fiber optic setup for quantification of root surface demineralization. Eur J Oral Sci 104:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Angmar-Månsson B, ten Bosch JJ (2001) Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF): a method for assessment of incipient caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30:298–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi XO, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Mansson B (2001) Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries. Caries Res 35:21–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ekenback SB, Linde LE, Lönnies H (2000) Effect of four dental varnishes on the colonization of cariogenic bacteria on exposed sound root surfaces. Caries Res 34:70–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Voco (2002) Scientific Product Information. Bifluoride 12. Fluoride varnish for the treatment of hypersensitivity and caries prevention. Voco, Cuxhaven, pp 1–4

  29. Lussi A (1991) Validity of diagnostic and treatment decisions of fissure caries. Caries Res 25:296–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tranaeus S, Al-Khateeb S, Björkman S, Tweetman S, Angmar-Mansson B (1999) Comparison of fluoride varnish treatment and professional tooth cleaning in caries-active children using the QLF method – a 6-month pilot study. Caries Res 33:304, abstract 69

    Google Scholar 

  31. Al-Khateeb S, Forsberg CM, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Månsson B (1998) A longitudinal laser fluorescence study of white spot lesions in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:595–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ogaard B, ten Bosch JJ (1994) Regression of white spot enamel lesions: a new optical method for quantitative longitudinal evaluation in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:238–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Youngs G (1994) Risk factors for and the prevention of root caries in older adults. Spec Care Dentist 14:68–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Inspektor Research Institute for providing the QLF system. We also appreciate the assistance of Monique van der Veen and Dr. Gürol Özyöney for their valuable help during measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilek Arslantunalı Tağtekin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durmusoglu, Ö., Tağtekin, D.A. & Yanıkoğlu, F. Clinical evaluation of demineralization and remineralization of intact root surface lesions in the clinic by a quantitative light-induced fluorescence system. Lasers Med Sci 27, 397–402 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0899-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0899-9

Keywords

Navigation