Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 339–342 | Cite as

Temperature change during non-contact diode laser irradiation of implant surfaces

  • Alessandro Geminiani
  • Jack G. Caton
  • Georgios E. RomanosEmail author
Original Article


A temperature increase of more than 10°C can compromise bone vitality. Laser radiation with different wavelengths has been used for the treatment of peri-implantitis, but little is known about the effect of laser irradiation on temperature rise on the implant surface. In this study, the temperature gradient (∆T) generated by laser irradiation of implant surface using two diode lasers (810 nm and a 980 nm) with 2 W of power has been recorded by two thermocouples (one in the cervical area and one in the apical area) and studied. The 810-nm diode laser showed the following results: after 60 s of irradiation with 2 W of continuous mode the temperature gradient in the cervical area of the implant (∆Tc) was 37.2°C, while in the apical area (∆Ta) was 27.2°C. The 980-nm diode laser showed the following results: after 60 s of irradiation with 2 W continuous mode ∆Tc was 41.1°C, and ∆Ta was 30.6°C. The 810-nm diode laser with 2 W continuous mode generated a temperature increase of 10°C after only 14 s. The 980-nm diode lasers groups produced a much more rapid temperature increase. In only 12 s, the continuous wave of 980 nm reached the 10°C temperature rise. From the present in vitro study it was concluded that the irradiation of implant surfaces with diode lasers may produce a temperature increase above the critical threshold (10°C ) after only 10 s.


Dental implants Diode laser Laser irradiation Temperature increase 



The author would like to thank Dr. Carlo Ercoli (Division of Prosthodontics), for providing the machines for temperature measurements for this in vitro study.


  1. 1.
    Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang H et al (2008) Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 17:5–15. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schnitman PA, Shulman LB (1979) Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc 98:373–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson AR (1986) The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1:11–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith DE, Zarb GA (1989) Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 62:567–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albrektsson T, Zarb GA (1998) Determinants of correct clinical reporting. Int J Prosthodont 11:517–521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T (2008) Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 35:286–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01274.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koldsland OC, Scheie AA, Aass AM (2010) Prevalence of peri-implantitis related to severity of the disease with different degrees of bone loss. J Periodontol 81:231–238. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090269 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lozada JL, James RA, Boskovic M et al (1990) Surgical repair of peri-implant defects. J Oral Implantol 16:42–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parham PL, Cobb CM, French AA et al (1989) Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro evaluation. J Oral Implantol 15:78–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fox SC, Moriarty JD, Kusy RP (1990) The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 61:485–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bergendal T, Forsgren L, Kvint S et al (1990) The effect of an airbrasive instrument on soft and hard tissues around osseointegrated implants. A case report. Swed Dent J 14:219–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koka S, Han J, Razzoog ME et al (1992) The effects of two air-powder abrasive prophylaxis systems on the surface of machined titanium: a pilot study. Implant Dent 1:259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCollum J, O’Neal RB, Brennan WA et al (1992) The effect of titanium implant abutment surface irregularities on plaque accumulation in vivo. J Periodontol 63:802–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zablotsky MH, Wittrig EE, Dl D et al (1992) Fibroblastic growth and attachment on hydroxyapatite-coated titanium surfaces following the use of various detoxification modalities. Part II: Contaminated hydroxyapatite. Implant Dent 1:195–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilson M, Burns T, Pearson GJ (1995) Bacteria in supragingival plaque samples can be killed by low-power laser light in the presence of a photosensitizer. J Appl Bacteriol 78:569–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Block CM, Mayo JA, Evans GH (1992) Effects of the Nd:YAG dental laser on plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants: surface alteration and attempted sterilization. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7:441–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yeh S, Jain K, Andreana S (2005) Using a diode laser to uncover dental implants in second-stage surgery. Gen Dent 53:414–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Romanos GE, Nentwig GH (1999) Diode laser (980 nm) in oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures: clinical observations based on clinical applications. J Clin Laser Med Surg 17:193–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Romanos et al (2009) Laser wavelengths and oral implantology. Lasers Med Sci 24:961–970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chu RT, Watanabe L, White JM, et al (1992) Temperature rise and surface modification of lased titanium cylinders. J Dent Res 71144, special issue, abstract no 312Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T (1983) Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 50:101–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T, Magnusson B (1984) Assessment of bone viability after heat trauma. A histological, histochemical and vital microscopic study in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 18:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eriksson RA, Albrektsson T (1984) The effect of heat on bone regeneration: an experimental study in the rabbit using the bone growth chamber. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:705–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Geminiani
    • 1
  • Jack G. Caton
    • 1
  • Georgios E. Romanos
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Periodontology, Eastman Institute for Oral HealthUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations