Low-level laser therapy of dentin hypersensitivity: a short-term clinical trial


The aim of this study was to evaluate low-level laser therapy in cervical dentin hypersensitivity. A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted with a total of 64 teeth. Dentin desensitizer and diode laser were applied on the cervical dentin surfaces. Distilled water and placebo laser was used as the placebo groups. The irradiance used was 4 J/cm2 per treatment site. The baseline measurement of hypersensitivity was made by using visual analog scale (VAS). Twenty-four hours and 7 days after the application of desensitizer, diode laser and placebo groups, a new VAS analysis was conducted for the patients’ sensitivity level. The mean pain scores of placebo groups were significantly higher than the desensitizer’s and diode laser’s mean scores (ANOVA, p < 0.05). The VAS analysis revealed a significant decrease in dentin hypersensitivity in 7 days with the use of the desensitizer and low-level laser therapy and no statistically significant difference was observed between these two treatments (p > 0.05). Although low-level laser and glutaraldehyde containing desensitizer present distinct modes of action, experimental agents caused a significant reduction of dentin hypersensitivity without showing secondary effects, not irritating the pulp or causing pain, not discoloring or staining the teeth, and not irritating the soft tissues at least for a period of 1 week with no drawbacks regarding handling and/or ease of application. Low-level laser therapy and desensitizer application had displayed similar effectiveness in reducing moderate dentin hypersensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. 1.

    Walters PA (2005) Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract 6:107–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pamir T, Ozyazici M, Baloğlu E, Onal B (2005) The efficacy of three desensitizing agents in treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Pharm Ther 30:73–76

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lier BB, Rösing CK, Aass AM, Gjermo P (2002) Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity by Nd:YAG laser. Clin Periodontol 29:501–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ritter AV, de L Dias W, Miguez P, Caplan DJ, Swift EJ Jr (2006) Treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity with fluoride varnish: a randomized clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 137:1013–1020

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Orchardson R, Gillam DG (2006) Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 137:990–998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lehmann N, Degrange M (2005) Effect of four dentin desensitizer on the shear bond strength of three bonding systems. Eur Cell Mater 9:52–53

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Panagakos F, Schiff T, Guignon A (2009) Dentin hypersensitivity: effective treatment with an in-office desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate. Am J Dent 22 Spec No, 3A-7A

  8. 8.

    Oberg C, Pochapski MT, Bpharm PVF, Granado CJF, Pilatti GL, Santos FA (2009) Evaluation of desensitizing agents on dentin permeability and dentinal tubule occlusion: an in vitro study. Gen Dent 57:497–501

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ciaramicoli MT, Carvalho RC, Eduardo CP (2003) Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity using neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Clinical evaluation. Lasers Surg Med 33:358–362

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Birang R, Poursamimi J, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M (2007) Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment. Lasers Med Sci 22:21–24

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schwarz F, Arweiler N, Georg T, Reich E (2002) Desensitizing effects of an Er:YAG laser on hypersensitive dentine. J Clin Periodontol 29:211–215

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K (2000) Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol 27:715–721

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tengrungsun T, Sangkla W (2008) Comparative study in desensitizing efficacy using the GaAlAs laser and dentin bonding agent. J Dent 36:392–395

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ladalardo TC, Pinheiro A, Campos RA et al (2004) Laser therapy in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Braz Dent J 15:144–150

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Corona SA, Nascimento TN, Catirse AB, Lizarelli RF, Dinelli W, Palma-Dibb RG (2003) Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 30:1183–1189

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Marsilio AL, Rodrigues JR, Borges AB (2003) Effect of the clinical application of the GaAlAs laser in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Laser Med Surg 21:291–296

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dilsiz A, Canakci V, Ozdemir A, Kaya Y (2009) Clinical evaluation of Nd:YAG and 685-nm diode laser therapy for desensitization of teeth with gingival recession. Photomed Laser Surg 27:843–848

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sicilia A, Cuesta-Frechoso S, Suárez A, Angulo J, Pordomingo A, De Juan P (2009) Immediate efficacy of diode laser application in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in periodontal maintenance patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 36:650–660

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vieira AH, Passos VF, de Assis JS, Mendonça JS, Santiago SL (2009) Clinical evaluation of a 3% potassium oxalate gel and a GaAlAs laser for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Photomed Laser Surg 27:807–812

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Can-Karabulut DC. Influence of a dentin desensitizer and a red wavelength diode laser application on bond strength of composite to dentin in vitro. Photomed Laser Surg (In Press)

  21. 21.

    Aranha AC, Siqueira Junior Ade S, Cavalcante LM, Pimenta LA, Marchi GM (2006) Microtensile bond strengths of composite to dentin treated with desensitizer products. J Adhes Dent 8:85–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Olusile AO, Bamise CT, Oginni AO, Dosumu OO (2008) Short-term clinical evaluation of four desensitizing agents. J Contemp Dent Pract 9:22–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ozen T, Orhan K, Avsever H, Tunca YM, Ulker AE, Akyol M (2009) Dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical comparison of three different agents in a short-term treatment period. Oper Dent 34:392–398

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Büyükgüral B, Cehreli ZC (2008) Effect of different adhesive protocols vs calcium hydroxide on primary tooth pulp with different remaining dentin thicknesses: 24-month results. Clin Oral Investig 12:91–96

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dahnhardt JE, Gygax M, Martignoni B, Suter P, Lussi A (2008) Treating sensitive cervical areas with ozone. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Am J Dent 21:74–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Creugers NH (1993) Resin-retained bridges in the treatment of traumatized dentition. Endod Dent Traumatol 9:53–56

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deniz C. Can-Karabulut.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orhan, K., Aksoy, U., Can-Karabulut, D.C. et al. Low-level laser therapy of dentin hypersensitivity: a short-term clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 26, 591–598 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0794-9

Download citation


  • Dentin hypersensitivity
  • Low-level laser therapy
  • Desensitizer
  • Clinical trial