Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser and bur

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites in class V cavities prepared by erbium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Er:YAG) laser and bur. Class V cavities were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 72 premolars by Er:YAG laser or bur and divided into six groups (n = 24). The occlusal margins were enamel and the cervical margins were cementum. The groups were as follows: group 1 Er:YAG laser preparation (E) + Xeno V (X) + CeramX (C); group 2 bur preparation (B) + X + C; group 3 E + AdheSE One (A) + Tetric EvoCeram (T); group 4 B + A + T; group 5 E + Clearfil S3 Bond (CSB) + Clearfil Majesty Esthetic (CME); group 6 B + CSB + CME. All teeth were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h, then thermocycled 500 times (5–55°C). Ten teeth from each group were chosen for the microleakage investigation and two teeth for the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation. The teeth that were prepared for the microleakage test were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. After immersion, the teeth were sectioned and observed under a stereomicroscope for dye penetration. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (P < 0.05). Bur-prepared cavities presented less microleakage in all groups for enamel (P < 0.05); however, in cervical margins, there were no differences between laser-prepared and bur-prepared cavities in the Xeno V + CeramX and AdheSE One + Tetric EvoCeram groups (P > 0.05). SEM observations of restorative material–dentin interfaces seemed to correspond with those of the microleakage test. Microleakage at the cervical interfaces was greater than that at the occlusal interfaces. Er:YAG laser-prepared class V cavities yielded more microleakage in occlusal margins with all-in-one self-etch adhesives and the respective manufacturer’s nanocomposites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN (2003) An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 134:1382–1390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS (2003) Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive. Effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 134:1621–1629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Attar N, Korkmaz Y (2007) Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 8:80–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hobson RS, McCabe JF (2002) Relationship between enamel etch characteristics and resin-enamel bond strength. Br Dent J 192:463–468. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4801401a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miyazaki S, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK (2001) Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 14:361–366

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leinfelder KF, Kurdziolek SM (2003) Self-etching bonding agents. Compend Contin Educ Dent 24:447–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perdigão J, Anauate-Netto C, Carmo AR, Lewgoy HR, Cordeiro HJ, Dutra-Corrêa M, Castilhos N, Amore R (2004) Influence of acid etching and enamel beveling on the 6-month clinical performance of a self-etch dentin adhesive. Compend Contin Educ Dent 25:33–34, 36–38, 40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christensen GJ (2002) Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 133:229–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ (1997) Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 8:306–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M (1997) The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 25:441–458. doi:10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00065-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swift EJ Jr (2002) Dentin/enamel adhesives: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 24:456–461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walshaw PR, McComb D (1996) Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 27:619–625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21:864–881. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gokcelik A, Ozel Y, Ozel E, Arhun N, Attar N, Firatli S, Firatli E (2007) The influence of Er:YAG laser conditioning versus self-etching adhesives with acid etching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Photomed Laser Surg 25:508–512. doi:10.1089/pho.2007.2096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cozean C, Arcoria CJ, Pelagalli J, Powell GL (1997) Dentistry for the 21st century? Erbium:YAG laser for teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 128:1080–1087

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schilke R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B, Raab WH (1998) Erbium:YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent 26:649–656. doi:10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00036-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, Rocha De SA, RA RTS, Palma-Dibb RG (2003) Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. J Oral Rehabil 30:1008–1014. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01173.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aranha AC, Turbino ML, Powell GL, Eduardo Cde P (2005) Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Lasers Surg Med 37:172–177. doi:10.1002/lsm.20208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Delme KI, Deman PJ, De Moor RJ (2005) Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. J Oral Rehabil 32:676–685. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01550.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N (2007) Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 9:189–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cenci M, Demarco F, de Carvalho R (2005) Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage. J Dent 33:603–610. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ (1992) In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer. Oper Dent 17:7–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Quo BC, Drummond JL, Koerber A, Fadavi S, Punwani I (2002) Glass ionomer microleakage from preparations by an Er/YAG laser or a high-speed handpiece. J Dent 30:141–146. doi:10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00011-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N (2008) Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract 9:65–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Asmussen E, Jorgensen KD (1978) Restorative resins: coefficient of thermal expansion—a factor of clinical significance? Quintessence Int Dent Dig 9:79–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Borsatto MC, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG (2004) Influence of the use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 29:430–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 16:414–420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M (2001) “No-bottle” vs “multi-bottle” dentin adhesives—a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373–380. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00084-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Duarte S Jr, Lopes MM (2005) Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacture. Oper Dent 30:492–499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 84:183–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pashley DH, Tay FR (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 17:430–444. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00104-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lizarelli RF, Silva PC, Neto ST, Bagnato VS (2004) Study of microleakage at class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser using rewetting surface treatment. J Clin Laser Med Surg 22:51–55. doi:10.1089/104454704773660976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Korkmaz Y, Attar N (2007) Dentin bond strength of composites with self-etching adhesives using LED curing lights. J Contemp Dent Pract 8:34–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wright GZ, Hatibovic-Kofman S, Millenaar DW, Braverman I (1999) The safety and efficacy of treatment with air abrasion technology. Int J Paediatr Dent 9:133–140. doi:10.1046/j.1365-263x.1999.00103.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Niu W, Eto JN, Kimura Y, Takeda FH, Matsumoto K (1998) A study on microleakage after resin filling of class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16:227–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Wright GZ, Braverman I (1998) Microleakage of sealants after conventional, bur, and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Pediatr Dent 20:173–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Armengol V, Jean A, Rohanizadeh R, Hamel H (1999) Scanning electron microscopic analysis of diseased and healthy dental hard tissues after Er:YAG laser irradiation: in vitro study. J Endod 25:543–546. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80376-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Corona SA, Borsatto M, Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pécora JD (2001) Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 26:491–497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA (2001) Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 14:157–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wright GZ, McConnell RJ, Keller U (1993) Microleakage of class V composite restorations prepared conventionally with those prepared with an Er:YAG laser: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent 15:425–426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Palma Dibb RG, Milori Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Ferreira KC, Pereira Ramos R, Djalma Pécora J (2002) Assessing microleakage on class V composite resin restorations after Er:YAG laser preparation varying the adhesive systems. J Clin Laser Med Surg 20:129–133. doi:10.1089/104454702760090209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ceballo L, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay FR, Marshall GW (2002) Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin. J Dent Res 81:119–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yudhira R, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2002) Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to erbium:YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 110:322–329. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21281.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH (1995) Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 20:18–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roebuck EM, Sauders WP, Whitters CJ (2000) Influence of erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 13:280–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yap AU, Mok BY, Pearson G (1997) An in vitro microleakage study of the ‘bonded-base’ restorative technique. J Oral Rehabil 24:230–264. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1997.tb00318.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH (1998) Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 23:185–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey

    Yonca Korkmaz

  2. Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli, Yuvacik, Basiskele, Kocaeli, Turkey

    Emre Ozel

  3. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Nuray Attar & Ceren Ozge Bicer

  4. Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

    Erhan Firatli

Authors
  1. Yonca Korkmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emre Ozel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nuray Attar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ceren Ozge Bicer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erhan Firatli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emre Ozel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korkmaz, Y., Ozel, E., Attar, N. et al. Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser and bur. Lasers Med Sci 25, 493–502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0672-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0672-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation