The use of light and laser for hair removal has evolved during the past few years. Laser systems such as the ruby laser (694 nm), alexandrite laser (755 nm), diode laser (810 nm) and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser (1,064 nm) are commonly used in hair removal. However, permanent hair removal has been difficult to achieve using lasers owing to the long growth/rest cycle of normal human hair follicles. There is still an increasing demand for safer and more efficient hair removal techniques. The latest and most effective choice in the treatment of hair removal is non-coherent intense pulsed light (IPL), which is both efficient and safe for hair removal. A group of 210 patients with skin type III–V were treated for superfluous hair in different areas of the body (face, extremities, axillae, bikini line and back) for three to five sessions at 6-week intervals using IPL. There was a significant hair reduction of about 80% with no side effects and minimal complications. Follow-up was done 6 months after the last session. In conclusion, IPL is very effective and safe for hair removal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Eremia S, Li CY, Umar SH, Newman N (2001) Laser hair removal: long-term results with a 755-nm Alexandrite Laser. Dermatol Surg 27:920–924
Liew SH (2002) Laser hair removal: guidelines for management. Am J Clin Dermatol 3:107–115
Gold MH, Bell MW, Foster TD, Street S (1999) One-year follow-up using an intense pulsed light source for long-term hair removal. J Cutan Laser Ther 1:167–171
Johnson F, Dovale M (1999) Intense pulsed light treatment of hirsutism: case reports of skin phototypes V and VI. J Cutan Laser Ther 1:233–237
Lor P, Lennartz B, Ruedlinger R (2002) Patient satisfaction study of unwanted facial and body hair: 5 years experience with intense pulsed light. J Cosmet Laser Ther 4:73–79
Sadick NS, Weiss RA, Shea CR, Nagel H, Nicholson J, Prieto VG (2000) Long-term photoepilation using a broad-spectrum intense pulsed light source. Arch Dermatol 136:1336–1340
Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Marwaha S, Harrington AC (1999) Hair removal with a non-coherent filtered flash lamp intense pulsed light source. Lasers Surg Med 24:128–132
Radmanesh M, Mostaghimi M, Yousefi I, Mousavi ZB, Rasai S, Esmaili HR, Khadivi HA (2002) Leukotrichia developed following application of intense pulsed light for hair removal. Dermatol Surg 28:572–574; discussion 574
Basak P, Kanwar AJ, Kaur S, Dhar S (1989) Faun-tail nevus–a case report. Indian J Dermatol 34(3):66–68
Bjerring P, Cramers M, Egekvist H, Christiansen K, Troilius A (2000) Hair reduction using a new intense pulsed light irradiator and a normal mode ruby laser. J Cutan Laser Ther 2:63–71
Sanchez LA, Perez M, Azziz R (2002) Laser hair reduction in the hirsute patient: a critical assessment. Hum Reprod Update 8:169–181
Schroeter CA, Groenewegen JS, Reineke T, Neumann HA (2003) Ninety percent permanent hair reduction in transsexual patients. Ann Plast Surg 51:243–248
Moreno-Arias GA, Castelo-Branco C, Ferrando J (2002) Paradoxical effect after IPL photoepilation. Dermatol Surg 28:1013–1016; discussion 1016
Moreno-Arias GA, Castelo-Branco C, Ferrando J (2002) Side effects after IPL photo depilation. Dermatol Surg 28:1131–1134
About this article
Cite this article
Bedewi, A.F.E. Hair removal with intense pulsed light. Lasers Med Sci 19, 48–51 (2004) doi:10.1007/s10103-004-0298-6
- Faun-tail nevi
- Hair removal
- Intense pulsed light (IPL)