Skip to main content
Log in

Lobbying contests with alternative instruments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This is a model of a contest where, in order to win, each opponent can use two instruments. The probabilities of winning are explored, as well as the expenditures of the interest groups, and the relative rent-dissipation in both cases where the players have the option to use only one instrument (the standard Tullock contest) and where the players have the option to use two instruments in the contest. We show that the use of two instruments strengthens the player with the higher stake, decreases the relative rent dissipation and it decreases total expenditure if the parties are sufficiently asymmetric.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: February 23, 2001 / Accepted: March 25, 2002

RID="*"

ID="*" We are grateful to two anonymous referees and the editor Kai Konrad, for constructive comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Epstein, G., Hefeker, C. Lobbying contests with alternative instruments. Econ Gov 4, 81–89 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010200049

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010200049

Navigation