Advertisement

Economics of Governance

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 119–140 | Cite as

Organized crime and public spending: a panel data analysis

  • Maria Berrittella
Original Paper
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate, empirically, what components of public spending imply a decreasing effect on organized crime and what components create opportunities for organized crime, discussing also the role of government efficiency. Using a panel data analysis, the results show a strikingly consistent pattern for the EU Member States. Organized crime mainly operates in the distribution of government spending for local public goods and public provision of private services. There is a decreasing effect on organized crime of the public expenditure devoted to education and social policy. Government efficiency in public spending is beneficial to limit the opportunities of the organized crime.

Keywords

Government efficiency Organized crime Panel data regression Public expenditure 

JEL Classification

C13 H50 K40 P37 

References

  1. Albanese JS (2015) Organized crime. from the mob to transnational organized crime, 7th edn. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandiera O (2003) Land reform, the market for protection, and the origins of the Sicilian mafia: theory and evidence. J Law Econ Organ 19:218–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barone G, Narciso G (2015) Organized crime and business subsidies: Where does the money go? J Urban Econ 86:98–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishement: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Porath Y (1967) The production of human capital and the life-cycle of earnings. J Polit Econ 75:352–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buonanno P, Montolio D (2008) Identifying the socio-economic and demographic determinants of crime across Spanish provinces. Int Rev Law Econ 28(2):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caruso R (2009) Public spending and organized crime in Italy. A panel-data analysis over the period 1997–2003. Istituto di Politica Economica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di MilanoGoogle Scholar
  8. Cayli B (2013) Italian civil society against the Mafia: from perceptions to expectations. Int J Law Crime Justice 41:81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson A (2013) The social determinants of the rule of law: a comparison of Jamaica and Barbados. World Dev 45:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gambetta D (1993) The sicilian mafia: the business of private protection. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Gennaioli C, Onorato M (2010) Public spending and organized crime: the case of the 1997 Marche and Umbria Earthquake. Mimeo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutmann J, Voigt S (2015) The rule of law: measurement and deep roots. CESifo Working Paper, No. 5670Google Scholar
  13. Kollias C, Mylonidisb N, Paleologou S (2013) Crime and the effectiveness of public order spending in Greece: policy implications of some persistent findings. J Policy Model 35(1):121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Konrad K, Skaperdas S (2012) The market for protection and the origin of the state. Econ Theor 50:417–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kotera G, Okada K (2017) How does democratization affect the composition of government expenditure? J Econ Behav Organ 137:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levitt S, Rubio M (2005) Understanding crime in Colombia and what can be done about it Institutional Reforms: the case of Colombia. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Lochner L, Moretti E (2004) The effect of education on crime: evidence from prison inmates, arrests and self-reports. Am Econ Rev 94:155–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neanidis KC, Rana MP (2014) Crime versus organized crime in Italy: Do their drivers differ? Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research, Discussion Paper Series, University of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Paoli L, Varese F (2014) The Oxford handbook of organized crime. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pascual DS (2017) Measuring organized crime: complexities of the quantitative and factorial analysis. In: Larsen HL, Blanco JM, Pastor RP, Yager RR (eds) Using open data to detect organized crime threats: factors driving future crime. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Dijk J (2007) Mafia markers: assessing organized crime and its impact upon societies. Trends Organ Crime 10(4):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Varese F (2011) Mafias on the move: how organized crime conquers new territories. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Aziendali e StatisticheUniversità degli Studi di PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations