Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Property rights out of anarchy? The Demsetz hypothesis in a game of conflict

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Demsetz hypothesis states that secure claims to property arise when the value of creating those rights is sufficiently high. This paper examines the conditions under which this holds in an anarchy equilibrium in which players may allocate labor to production, to conflict, or to the public good of secure claims to property protection. In a simultaneous choice Nash equilibrium, no secure claims to property are created. However, if players play a sequential choice game in which secure claims to property protection occurs in the first stage, then the strategic benefit of reducing others’ subsequent conflict allocation causes secure claims to property to arise. Secure claims to property in a social contract are imperfect, but for sufficiently high productivity of resources, the social contract welfare dominates autocracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2000) Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world distribution. Q J Econ 117: 1231–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL, Hill PJ (1975) The evolution of property rights: a study of the American west. J Law Econ 18: 163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baik KH, Shogren JF (1992) Strategic behavior in contests: comment. Am Econ Rev 82: 359–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Banner S (2002) Transitions between property regimes. J Legal Stud 31: 359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrington BC (1900) The Magna Charta and other Great Charters of England. Fred B. Rothman and Co, Littleton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch M (1960) Feudal society: the beginings of the ties of dependency, vol 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce JR, Nostbakken L (2011) Exploration and development of U.S. oil and gas fields, 1955–2002. J Econ Dyn Control 35: 891–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay K, Wright G (2005) Order without law? property rights during the California gold rush. Explor Econ Hist 42: 155–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H (1967) Toward a theory of property rights. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 57: 347–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J (1997) Guns, germs and steel: the fates of human societies. W.W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A (1987) Strategic behavior in contests. Am Econ Rev 77: 891–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel MR, Skaperdas S (2007) Economics of conflict: an overview, Chap 3. In: Sandler T, Hartley K (eds). Handbook of defense economics 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam

  • Grossman HI (2002) Make us a king’: anarchy, predation, and the state. Eur J Polit Econ 18: 31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman HI, Kim M (1995) Swords or plowshares? a theory of the security of claims to property. J Polit Econ 103: 1275–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haavelmo T (1954) A study in the theory of economic evolution. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafer C (2006) On the origins of property rights: conflict and production in the state of nature. Rev Econ Stud 73: 119–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman AL, Riley JG (1989) Politically contestable rents and transfers. Econ Polit 1: 17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (1991) Paradox of power. Econ Polit 3: 177–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (1995) Anarchy and its breakdown. J Polit Econ 103: 16–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (2000) The macrotechnology of conflict. J Confl Resolut 44: 773–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotte L (2001) Conflicts over property rights and natural-resource exploitation at the frontier. J Dev Econ 66: 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz L (2008) But who will guard the guardians?. Am Econ Rev 98: 577–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmar M (2008) Perfectly secure property rights and production inefficiencies in Tullock contests. South Econ J 75: 441–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Leninger W (1993) More efficient rent seeking—a Munchhausen solution. Public Choice 75: 43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libecap GD, Wiggins SN (1985) The influence of private contractual failure on regulation: the case of oil field unitization. J Polit Econ 93: 690–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller DC (2003) Public choice III Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy KM, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth?. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 83: 409–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1993) Dictatorship, democracy, and development. Am Polit Sci Rev 87: 567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom Elinor E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas S (1992) Cooperation, conflict, and power in the absence of property rights. Am Econ Rev 82: 720–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas S (1996) Contest success functions. Econ Theory 7: 283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent seeking. In: Buchanan JM, Tollison RD, Tullock G (eds) Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX, pp 97–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbeck J (1977) The Califorinia gold rush: a study of emerging property rights. Explor Econ Hist 14: 197–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe R (1990) The tin pot and the totalitarian: an economic theory of dictatorship. Am Polit Sci Rev 84: 849–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Boyce.

Additional information

We have benefited from comments by Jeff Church, Curtis Eaton, Herb Emery, Steven Holland, Elinor Ostrom, Joanne Roberts, three anonymous referees, and the editor, Amihai Glazer. All remaining errors are our own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyce, J.R., Bruner, D.M. Property rights out of anarchy? The Demsetz hypothesis in a game of conflict. Econ Gov 13, 95–120 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-012-0107-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-012-0107-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation