Skip to main content
Log in

Unemployment and gang crime: can prosperity backfire?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study how unemployment affects gang crime. We examine a model of criminal gangs and suggest that a substitution effect between petty crime and severe crime is at work. In the model, non-monetary valuation of gang membership is private knowledge. Thus, the leaders face a trade-off between less crime per member in large gangs and more crime per member in small gangs. A decrease in unemployment may result in a switch from a large gang that requires petty crime to a small gang that requires severe crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof G, Yellen J (1994) Gang behavior, law enforcement, and community values. In values and public policy. In: Henry A, Thomas M, Taylor T (eds) The Brookings Institute, Washington, DC, pp 173–209

  • Anderson E (1999) Code of the street. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Political Econ 76: 169–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM (1973) A defence of organized crime. In: Rottemberg S (ed) The economics of crime and punishment. The American Enterprise Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiricos T (1987) Rates of crime and unemployment: an analysis of aggregate research evidence. Soc Probl 34: 187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker SH, van Winkle B (1996) Life in the gang: family, friends, and violence. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dnes AW, Garoupa N (2010) Behavior, human capital and the formation of gangs. Kyklos 4: 517–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dur R (2006) Status-seeking in criminal subcultures and the double dividend of zero-tolerance. CESifo WP 1762

  • Fiorentini G, Peltzman S (1995) The economics of organized crime. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fougère DFK, Pouget J, Kramarz F (2009) Youth unemployment and crime in France. J Eur Econ Assoc 7: 909–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta D (1993) The sicilian mafia. The business of private protection. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabianowski E (2010) How street gangs work. http://www.howstuffworks.com. Accessed 10 May 2010

  • Hagedorn J (1988) People and folks: gangs, crime and the underclass in a Rustbelt City. Lake View Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski MS (1991) Islands in the street. University of California Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus T, Lim JJ (2009) Sticks and carrots: two incentive mechanisms supporting intra-group cooperation. Econ Lett 102: 177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein MW (1995) The American street gang: its nature, prevalence, and control. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox GW (2006) Findings from the K-12 survey project, a special report of the NGCRC, Mimeo, The National Gang Crime Research Center

  • Konrad K, Skaperdas S (1997) Credible threats in extortion. J Econ Behav Organ 33: 23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou DN, Hutson HR, Anglin D, Peek-Asa C, Kraus JF (1999) The relationship between socioeconomic factors and gang violence in the city of Los Angeles. The J Trauma 46: 334–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt SD (2004) Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. J Econ Perspect 18: 163–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt SD, Venkatesh S (2000) An economic analysis of a drug-selling gang’s finances. Q J Econ 115: 755–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Los Angeles Times (2007) Los Angeles names and targets city’s worst 11 gangs, 6 Feb 2007

  • Mansour A, Marceau N, Mongrain S (2006) Gangs and crime deterrence. J Law Econ Organ 22: 315–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neher PA (1978) The pure theory of the muggery. Am Econ Rev 68: 437–445

    Google Scholar 

  • OJJDP Fact Sheet (2002) Highlights of the 2000 national youth gang survey, Mimeo, US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

  • Öster A, Agell J (2007) Crime, unemployment and labor market programs in turbulent times. J Eur Econ Assoc 5: 752–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla FM (1992) The gang as an American enterprise. Rutgers University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Poret S (2003) Paradoxical effects of law enforcement policies: the case of the illicit drug market. Int Rev Law Econ 22: 465–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutvaara P, Priks M (2009) Hooliganism and police tactics. J Public Econ Theory 11: 441–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael S, Winter-Ebmer R (2001) Identifying the effect of unemployment on crime. J Law Econ 44: 259–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter D (1983) Disorganized crime, illegal markets and the mafia. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T (1984) What is the business of organized crime?. In: Schelling T (ed) Choice and consequence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 179–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Seals A (2009) Are gangs a substitute for legitimate employment? Investigating the impact of labor market effects on gang affiliation. Kyklos 3: 407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas S (2001) The political economy of organized crime: providing protection when the state does not. Econ Gov 2: 173–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler GJ (1970) The optimum enforcement of laws. J Political Econ 78: 526–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suttles GD (1968) The social order of the slum. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JQ, Kelling K (1982) Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. Atl Mon 249: 29–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Priks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poutvaara, P., Priks, M. Unemployment and gang crime: can prosperity backfire?. Econ Gov 12, 259–273 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0094-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0094-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation