Abstract
In many countries elderly workers are subject to a double distortion when they consider prolonging their activity: the payroll tax and a reduction in their pension rights. It is often argued that such a double burden would not be socially desirable. We consider a setting where it would be rejected by both a utilitarian and a Rawlsian social planner. Furthermore, each individual would also reject it as a citizen candidate. We show that the double burden may nevertheless be (second-best) Pareto efficient and can be supported by a particular structure of social weights biased towards the more productive workers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartels L (2002) Economic inequality and political representation. Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Princeton University, Mimeo,
Bénabou R (2004) Inequality, technology, and the social contract. In: Aghion P., Durlauf S. (eds). Handbook of economic growth. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Blondal S, Scarpetta S (1998) The retirement decision in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 2002, Paris
Boldrin M, Dolado JJ, Jimeno JF, Perrachi F (1999) The future of pensions in Europe. Econ Policy 29:289–320
Conde-Ruiz JI, Galasso V (2003) Early retirement. Rev Econ Dyn 6:12–36
Coughlin P, Nitzan S (1981) Electoral outcomes with probabilistic voting and Nash social welfare maxima. J Public Econ 15:113–21
Dixit A, Londregan J (1996) The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. J Polit 58:1132–55
Gruber J, Wise D (eds) (1999) Social security and retirement around the world. The Chicago University Press, Chicago
Herbertsson TT, Orszag MJ (2001) Policy options and issues in reforming european supplementary pension systems. Journal of Tensions Management 7:117–30
Lindbeck A, Weibull JW (1987) Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition. Public Choice 52:273–97
Profeta P (2002) Retirement and social security in a probabilistic voting model. Int Tax and Public Finance 9:331–48
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casamatta, G., Cremer, H. & Pestieau, P. Is there a Political Support for the Double Burden on Prolonged Activity?. Economics of Governance 7, 143–154 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-005-0001-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-005-0001-9