Advertisement

A model for locating preventive health care facilities

  • Kerim Dogan
  • Mumtaz KaratasEmail author
  • Ertan Yakici
Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the problem of locating preventive health care (PHC) facilities. The most important factors that promote participation rates in PHC programs include the establishment of an appropriate infrastructure and the provision of a satisfactory quality of care. For this purpose, we develop a strategic level multi-objective mixed integer linear programming model for locating PHC facilities to ensure maximum participation and provide timely service to potential clients. We, then, apply the model to a case study of locating Cancer Early Diagnosis, Screening and Training Centers in Istanbul, Turkey and solve it considering the forecasted population of each district in Istanbul for the next 15 years. We also perform a sensitivity analysis to quantify the effect of different weighting strategies on the value of each term in the objective function.

Keywords

Facility location Preventive health care Cancer screening Goal programming 

Notes

References

  1. Aboolian R, Berman O, Drezner Z (2008) Location and allocation of service units on a congested network. IIE Trans 40(4):422–433Google Scholar
  2. Aboolian R, Berman O, Verter V (2015) Maximal accessibility network design in the public sector. Transp Sci 50(1):336–347Google Scholar
  3. Afshari H, Peng Q (2014) Challenges and solutions for location of healthcare facilities. Ind Eng Manag 3(2):1–12Google Scholar
  4. Ahmadi-Javid A, Seyedi P, Syam SS (2017) A survey of healthcare facility location. Comput Oper Res 79:223–263Google Scholar
  5. Anttila A, Ronco G, Ponti A, Senore C, Basu P, Segnan N, Tomatis N, Zakelj MP, Dillner J, Fernan M, Elfström KM, Lönnberg S, Soerjomataram R, Vale D (2017) Cancer screening in the European Union. Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on cancer screeningGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Melillo S, Habarta N, Kalra GP, Chattopadhyay S, Wilson KM, Lee NC, Mullen PD, Coughlin SS, Briss PA, Task Force on Community Preventive Services (2008a) Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 35(1):S34–S55Google Scholar
  7. Baron O, Berman O, Krass D (2008b) Facility location with stochastic demand and constraints on waiting time. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 10(3):484–505Google Scholar
  8. Berman O, Drezner Z (2006) Location of congested capacitated facilities with distance-sensitive demand. IIE Trans 38(3):213–221Google Scholar
  9. Berman O, Krass D (2002) The generalized maximal covering location problem. Comput Oper Res 29(6):563–581Google Scholar
  10. Berman O, Krass D (2015) Stochastic location models with congestion. In: Laporte G, Nickel S, Saldanha da Gama F (eds) Location science. Springer, New York, pp 443–486Google Scholar
  11. Berman O, Krass D, Drezner Z (2003) The gradual covering decay location problem on a network. Eur J Oper Res 151(3):474–480Google Scholar
  12. Berman O, Krass D, Wang J (2006) Locating service facilities to reduce lost demand. IIE Trans 38(11):933–946Google Scholar
  13. Castillo I, Ingolfsson A, Sim T (2009) Socially optimal location of facilities with fixed servers, stochastic demand and congestion. Prod Oper Manag 18(6):721–736Google Scholar
  14. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1977) Goal programming and multiple objective optimizations—part 1. Eur J Oper Res 1(1):39-j4Google Scholar
  16. Daskin MS, Dean LK (2004) Location of health care facilities. In: Brandeau ML, Sainfort F, Pierskalla WP (eds) Operations research and health care. A handbook of methods and applications, Kluwer’s International Series. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, London, pp 43–76Google Scholar
  17. Davari S, Kilic K, Ertek G (2015) Fuzzy bi-objective preventive health care network design. Health Care Manag Sci 18(3):303–317Google Scholar
  18. Davari S, Kilic K, Naderi S (2016) A heuristic approach to solve the preventive health care problem with budget and congestion constraints. Appl Math Comput 276:442–453Google Scholar
  19. Elhedhli S (2006) Service system design with immobile servers, stochastic demand, and congestion. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 8(1):92–97Google Scholar
  20. Food and Drug Administration (2001) Compliance guidance: the mammography quality standards act final regulations: Preparing for MQSA Inspections; final guidance for industry and FDA. US Department of Health and Human Services, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Grodzevich O, Romanko O (2006) Normalization and other topics in multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the fields—MITACS industrial problems workshop, pp 89–101Google Scholar
  22. Gu W, Wang X, McGregor SE (2010) Optimization of preventive health care facility locations. Int J Health Geogr 9(1):17Google Scholar
  23. Güneş ED, Nickel S (2015) Location problems in healthcare. In: Laporte G, Nickel S, Saldanha da Gama F (eds) Location science. Springer, Cham, pp 555–579Google Scholar
  24. Güneş ED, Yaman H, Çekyay B, Verter V (2014) Matching patient and physician preferences in designing a primary care facility network. J Oper Res Soc 65(4):483–496Google Scholar
  25. Hakimi SL (1964) Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Oper Res 12(3):450–459Google Scholar
  26. Holt CC (1957) Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages. Office of Naval Research Memorandum 52, Carnegie Institute of Technology, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  27. Hosking M, Roberts S, Uzsoy R, Joseph TM (2013) Investigating interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening: insights from a simulation model. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 47(2):142–155Google Scholar
  28. IARC (2017) International agency for research on cancer, cancer today. http://gco.iarc.fr/. Accessed 17 May 2004
  29. Jones D, Tamiz M (2010) Practical goal programming, vol 141. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Kan L, Olivotto IA, Warren Burhenne LJ, Sickles EA, Coldman AJ (2000) Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program. Radiology 215(2):563–567Google Scholar
  31. Karasakal O, Karasakal EK (2004) A maximal covering location model in the presence of partial coverage. Comput Oper Res 31(9):1515–1526Google Scholar
  32. Karatas M (2017) A multi-objective facility location problem in the presence of variable gradual coverage performance and cooperative cover. Eur J Oper Res 262(3):1040–1051Google Scholar
  33. Karatas M, Sulukan E, Karacan I (2018) Assessment of Turkey’s energy management performance via a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Energy 153:890–912Google Scholar
  34. Keskinkılıc B, Gültekin M, Akarca AS, Ozturk C, Boztas B, Karaca MZ, Utku E, Hacikamiloglu E, Turan H, Dede I, Dündar S (2016) Turkey cancer control programme. The Ministry of Health of Turkey, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  35. KETEM (2017) Kanser Erken Teşhis, Tarama ve Eğitim Merkezi İletişim Adresleri. http://kanser.gov.tr/kanser/kanser-taramalari/887-ketem-iletişim-adresleri.html/. Accessed 17 May 2004
  36. Khan-Gates JA, Ersek JL, Eberth JM, Adams SA, Pruitt SL (2015) Geographic access to mammography and its relationship to breast cancer screening and stage at diagnosis: a systematic review. Women’s Health Issues 25(5):482–493Google Scholar
  37. Marianov V, Serra D (2002) Location–allocation of multiple-server service centers with constrained queues or waiting times. Ann Oper Res 111(1–4):35–50Google Scholar
  38. Miles A, Cockburn J, Smith RA, Wardle J (2004) A perspective from countries using organized screening programs. Cancer 101(S5):1201–1213Google Scholar
  39. Nazim A, Afthanorhan A (2014) A comparison between single exponential smoothing (SES), double exponential smoothing (DES), Holt’s (Brown) and adaptive response rate exponential smoothing (ARRES) techniques in forecasting Malaysia population. Glob J Math Anal 2(4):276–280Google Scholar
  40. Or Z, Renaud T (2012) Impact du volume d’activité sur les résultats de soins à l’hôpital en France. Public Econ 24–25:187–219Google Scholar
  41. Ozmen V, Anderson BO (2008) The challenge of breast cancer in low-and middle-income countries—implementing the breast health global initiative guidelines. US oncology, touch briefing, pp 76–79Google Scholar
  42. Özmen Tolga, Yüce Salih, Güler Tekin, Ulun Canan, Özaydın Nilufer, Pruthi Sandhya, Akkapulu Nezih, Karabulut Koray, Soran Atilla, Özmen Vahit (2016) Barriers against mammographic screening in a socioeconomically underdeveloped population: a population-based, cross-sectional study. Literacy 865:44Google Scholar
  43. Razı N, Karatas M (2016) A multi-objective model for locating search and rescue boats. Eur J Oper Res 254(1):279–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.026 Google Scholar
  44. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L (2008) Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program SEER* stat database: incidence—SEER 9 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2005 Sub (1973–2003). National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch. Released April 2006, based on the November 2005 submissionGoogle Scholar
  45. Ryu K, Sanchez A (2003) The evaluation of forecasting methods at an institutional foodservice dining facility. J Hosp Financ Manag 11(1):27–45Google Scholar
  46. Schniederjans M (2012) Goal programming: methodology and applications: methodology and applications. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. SEER (2017) Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. Cancer statistics. Cancer mortality rates. https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics/types/mortality.html/. Accessed 17 May 2004
  48. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65(2):87–108Google Scholar
  49. Tsouros C, Satratzemi M (1994) Supply centers allocation under budgeted restrictions minimizing the longest delivery time. Int J Prod Econ 35(1–3):373–377Google Scholar
  50. Tuncer M, Ozgul GM (2011) National cancer control program 2009–2015. Turkish Ministry of Health Publication, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  51. Verter V, Lapierre SD (2002) Location of preventive health care facilities. Ann Oper Res 110(1–4):123–132Google Scholar
  52. Verter V, Zhang Y (2015) Location models for preventive care. In: Eiselt HA, Marianov V (eds) Applications of location analysis. Springer, New York, pp 223–241Google Scholar
  53. Vidyarthi N, Kuzgunkaya O (2015) The impact of directed choice on the design of preventive healthcare facility network under congestion. Health Care Manag Sci 18(4):459–474Google Scholar
  54. Wang Q, Batta R, Rump CM (2002) Algorithms for a facility location problem with stochastic customer demand and immobile servers. Ann Oper Res 111(1–4):17–34Google Scholar
  55. Weiss JE, Greenlick MR, Jones JF (1971) Determinants of medical care utilization: the impact of spatial factors. Inquiry 8(4):50–57Google Scholar
  56. World Health Organization (2007) Cancer control: knowledge into action. WHO guide for effective programmes. Early detectionGoogle Scholar
  57. World Health Organization (2014) WHO position paper on mammography screening. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang Y, Berman O, Verter V (2009) Incorporating congestion in preventive healthcare facility network design. Eur J Oper Res 198(3):922–935Google Scholar
  59. Zhang Y, Berman O, Marcotte P, Verter V (2010) A bilevel model for preventive healthcare facility network design with congestion. IIE Trans 42(12):865–880Google Scholar
  60. Zhang Y, Berman O, Verter V (2012) The impact of client choice on preventive healthcare facility network design. OR Spectr 34(2):349–370Google Scholar
  61. Zimmerman SM (1997) Factors influencing Hispanic participation in prostate cancer screening. In: Oncology nursing forum, vol 24, no 3, pp 499–504Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barbaros Naval Sciences and Engineering InstituteNational Defense UniversityTuzla, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringNational Defense University, Naval AcademyTuzla, IstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Industrial EngineeringBahcesehir UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations