Abstract
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) heavily depends on the dimensionality of the variables, and previous studies address the problem by decreasing the dimensionality with a minimal loss of information. Since the lost information can also have the impact on the evaluation performance, this paper accordingly proposes an approach to improve the discriminatory power of DEA without losing any variables information and without requiring any additional preferential information. Furthermore, an accelerating approach based on the concept of parallel computing is introduced to solve the multi-subsets problem. Listing all the possible variables subsets as the nodes, then the DEA efficiencies under each node are calculated, and the corresponding purity of information can be scientifically generated based on Renyi’s entropy. Subsequently, the important degrees of nodes are obtained by normalizing the purities of information, and the comprehensive efficiency scores can be finally generated by the weighted sum between the important degrees and the efficiencies under the corresponding node. Two specific examples are provided to evaluate the performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler N, Berechman J (2001) Measuring airport quality from the airlines’ viewpoint: an application of data envelopment analysis. Transp Policy 8(3):171–181
Adler N, Golany B (2001) Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):18–31
Adler N, Golany B (2002) Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 46(1):66–73
Adler N, Yazhemsky E (2010) Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA-DEA. Eur J Oper Res 202:273–284
Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 39(10):1261–1294
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(8):1078–1092
Barr RS, Durchholz ML (1997) Parallel and hierarchical decomposition approaches for solving large-scale data envelopment analysis models. Ann Oper Res 73:339–372
Bergendahl G (1998) DEA and benchmarks? An application to Nordic banks. Ann Oper Res 82:233–250
Branda M, Kopa M (2014) On relations between DEA-risk models and stochastic dominance efficiency tests. CEJOR 22(1):13–35
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444
Chen WC, Cho WJ (2009) A procedure for large-scale DEA computations. Comput Oper Res 36:1813–1824
Cinca S, Molinero CM (2004) Selecting DEA specifications and ranking units via PCA. J Oper Res Soc 55(5):521–528
Cooper WW, Sieford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA solver software. Kluwer, Norwell
Dul JH (2008) A computational study of DEA with massive data sets. Comput Oper Res 35:1191–1203
Dyson R, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132:245–259
Farell M (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A (Gen) 120:253–281
Fayyad UM, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P, Uthurusamy R (1996) Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge
Friedman Sinuany-Stern (1998) Combining ranking scales and selecting variables in the DEA context: the case of industrial branches. Comput Oper Res 25(9):781–791
García-Sánchez IM, Rodríguez-Domínguez L, Parra-Domínguez J (2013) Yearly evolution of police efficiency in Spain and explanatory factors. CEJOR 21(1):31–62
Jenkins L, Anderson M (2003) A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 147:51–61
Kneip A, Park BU, Simar L (1998) A note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA estimators for production efficiency scores. Econom Theory 14:783–793
Liang L, Li YJ, Li SB (2009) Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the undesirable outputs and large dimensionality of data sets with PCA. Expert Syst Appl 36:5895–5899
Liang L, Wu J, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008) The dea game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Oper Res 56:1278–1288
Pastor JT, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2002) A statistical test for nested radial DEA models. Oper Res 50:728–735
Principe JC (2010) Information theoretic learning. Renyi’s entropy, Springer, New York
Renyi A (1961) On measures of information and entropy. Proc Fourth Berkeley Symp Math Stat Probab 1960:547–561
Sahoo BK, Luptacik M, Mahlberg B (2011) Alternative measures of environmental technology structure in DEA: an application. Eur J Oper Res 215(3):750–762
Shanmugam R, Johnson C (2007) At a crossroad of data envelopment and principal component analyses. Omega 35(4):351–364
Simar L, Wilson PW (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. J Prod Anal 13(1):49–78
Wagner JM, Shimshak DG (2007) Stepwise selection of variables in data envelopment analysis: procedures and managerial perspectives. Eur J Oper Res 180:57–67
Xie QW, Dai QZ, Li YJ, Jiang A (2014) Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA using Shannon’s entropy. Entropy 16(3):1571–1585
Zhong W, Yuan W, Li S, Huang Z (2011) The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in China: an application of DEA based on the first official China economic. Omega 39(4):447–455
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants (Nos. 61673381 and 61773029), Social Science Foundation of Beijing under Grant (No. 16JDGLC005) and the Project of Great Wall Scholar, Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (CIT&TCD20180305).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, Q., Li, Y., Wang, L. et al. Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis without losing information based on Renyi’s entropy. Cent Eur J Oper Res 26, 1053–1068 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0550-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0550-y