Using the appropriate methodology for strategic decision-making in higher education is crucial to make effective decisions. In this paper, the analytic network process (ANP), one of the most suitable decision-making methods in terms of higher education issues, is presented and evaluated from the position of the user. After recognising some characteristics of the ANP that can be improved, the main objective of this research was to develop a new method based on the characteristics of the ANP and social network analysis (SNA). The research methodology used in this paper is the design science research process (DSRP), which is often used to design new artefacts, such as models, methods and methodologies. The main phases of this approach include problem identification, objectives of a solution, design and development, demonstration of the artefact, evaluation and dissemination. By using the DSRP, a new decision-making method is designed and proposed. The new method has two components that are based on the ANP and SNA. The first component is related to determining the importance of criteria with respect to the goal of decision-making. The second component is related to modelling influences/dependencies between criteria, and identifying criteria that strongly influence others, as well as criteria that others depend on. A measure that describes how strong a particular criterion is in terms of influences/dependencies is based on the centrality degree, one of the most fundamental centrality measures. In this paper, the new method, which was evaluated on several cases, is demonstrated with example of evaluating scientists, and a comparison of the new method’s results and the ANP method’s results is presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Attri R, Dev N, Sharma V (2013) Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview. Res J Manag Sci 2(2):3–8. doi:10.1108/01443579410062086
Begičević N (2008) Višekriterijski modeli odlučivanja u strateškom plniranju uvođenja e-učenja. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Organization and Informatics
Begičević N, Divjak B, Hunjak T (2007) Prioritization of e-learning forms: a multicriteria methodology. CEJOR 15(4):405–419. doi:10.1007/s10100-007-0039-6
Belton V, Stewart ST (2010) Problem structuring and MCDA, pp 209–239. Retrieved from http://www.education.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/224/People/Academic_Staff/Theodor/PSMCDAchapter.pdf
Bhadani AK, Shankar R, Rao DV (2016) Modeling the barriers of service adoption in rural Indian telecom using integrated ISM-ANP. J Model Manag 11(1):2–25. doi:10.1108/JM2-09-2013-0041
Creswell JW (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, vol 3. doi:10.1016/j.math.2010.09.003
Divjak B (2016) Challenges of strategic decision-making within higher education and evaluation of the strategic decisions. In Hunjak T, Kirinić V, Konecki M (eds) Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, pp 41–46. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Organization and Informatics Varaždin. Retrieved from http://archive.ceciis.foi.hr/app/public/conferences/1/ceciis2016/papers/ECIS-2.pdf
Divjak B, Begicevic N (2015) Strategic decision making cycle in higher education: case study of E-learning. In: International conference on E-learning 2015. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/280711901
Divjak B, Project Associates (2017) Webpage od the project development of a methodological framework for strategic decision-making in higher education—a case of open and distance learning (ODL) implementation. Retrieved January 7, 2017, from http://higherdecision.foi.hr/
Falatoonitoosi E, Ahmed S, Sorooshian S (2014) Expanded DEMATEL for determining cause and effect group in bidirectional relations. Sci World J 2014:1–7. doi:10.1155/2014/103846
Harker PT, Vargas LG (1987) The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci 33(11):1383–1403. doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383
Kadoić N, Ređep NB, Divjak B (2016) E-learning decision making: methods and methodologies. In: Re-imagining learning scenarios, vol CONFERENCE. European Distance and E-Learning Network, Budapest, Hungary, p 24
Kadoić N, Ređep NB, Divjak B (2017a) Decision making with the analytic network process (SOR 2017). Bled, Ljubljana
Kadoić N, Ređep NB, Divjak B (2017b) Structuring e-learning multi-criteria decision making problems. In Billjanović P (ed) Proceedings of 40th Jubilee International Convention, MIPRO 2017. Croatian Society for Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, Opatija, Croatia, pp 811–817
Kadoić N, Divjak B, Begičević RN (2017c) Effective strategic decision making on open and distance education issues. In: Volungeviciene A, Szűcs A (eds) Diversity matters!. European Distance and E-Learning Network, Jönköping, pp 224–234
Knoke D, Yang S (2008) Social network analysis (quantitative applications in the social sciences)
Michnik J (2013) Weighted influence non-linear gauge system (WINGS)—a analysis method for the systems of interrelated components. Eur J Oper Res 228(3):536–544. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.007
Opsahl T, Agneessens F, Skvoretz J (2010) Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc Netw 32(3):245–251. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006
Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Gengler CE, Rossi M, Hui W, Virtanen V, Bragge J (2006) The design science research process: a model for producing and presenting information systems research. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST), pp 83–106
Saaty TL (2001) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process: the organization and prioritization of complexity, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, New York
Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98
Saaty TL, Cillo B (2008) A dictionary of complex decision using the analytic network process, the encyclicon, vol 2, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the analytic network process: economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Springer; Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st edn. 2006 edition, 28 December 2009
Sayyadi G, Awasthi A (2013) AHP-based approach for location planning of pedestrian zones: application in Montreal. Can J Transp Eng 139(2):239–246. doi:10.1061/(Asce)Te.1943-5436.0000493
Shao J, Taisch M, Ortega M, Elisa D (2014) Application of the DEMATEL method to identify relations among barriers between green products and consumers. In: 17th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production—ERSCP 2014, pp 1029–1040. Retrieved from https://conferences1.matheo.si/getFile.py/access?resId=0&materialId=3&confId=0
Sharma P, Thakar G, Gupta RC (2013) Interpretive structural modeling of functional objectives (criteria’s) of assembly line balancing problem. Int J Comput Appl 83(13):14–22
Shih-Hsi Y, Wang CC, Teng L-Y, Hsing YM (2012) Application of DEMATEL, ISM, and ANP for key success factor (KSF) complexity analysis in R&D alliance. Sci Res Essays 7(19):1872–1890. doi:10.5897/SRE11.2252
Sikavica P, Hernaus T, Ređep NB, Hunjak T (2014) Poslovno odlučivanje. Školska knjiga Zagreb
Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient (2017) In: The concise encyclopedia of statistics. Springer, New York, pp 502–505. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-32833-1_379
Vaishnavi V, Kuechler B (2004) Design science research in information systems overview of design science research. Ais. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8
Wudhikarn R (2016) An efficient resource allocation in strategic management using a novel hybrid method. Manag Decis 54(7):1702–1731. doi:10.1108/MD-08-2015-0380
This paper has been supported by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project, “Development of a methodological framework for strategic decision-making in higher education—a case of open and distance learning (ODL) implementation”. Project Number: IP-2014-09-7854. Details about the project can be found at the project website http://higherdecision.foi.hr/en.
About this article
Cite this article
Kadoić, N., Ređep, N.B. & Divjak, B. A new method for strategic decision-making in higher education. Cent Eur J Oper Res 26, 611–628 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-017-0497-4
- Higher education